date

082-062] 11 March 1808 Letter
082-062]

11 March 1808

Letter V

§.6. Reasons

Ends of Justice

After these explanations, the conduct of the legislator being all along understood to be the object of reference, the causes of injustice may, at whatsoever degree of nearness or remoteness they may be found to stand with relation to that injustice which in their common and ultimate effect, be distinguished in a practical point of view, and is conceived with great practical advantage, into natural and factitious: factitious, considered as made by, that is, in being the work of, the result of the line of conduct pursued by, the legislator: natural, all causes of injustice, which to the purpose in question as having their root in any other grounds: in misconduct on the part of the Judge in misconduct on the part of individuals, in the character of litigants or any other taken without distinction, or as being purely the work of the uncontroulable powers of nature.

Again, in regard to such causes as are considered as factitious, another distinction which, so far as it can be clearly traced out; will be seen to be highly useful in a practical point of view, is that which stands expressed by the adjuncts positive and negative: positive, when an assignable article or rule of law established whether by the proper hands of the legislator in the way of statute law; or under his eye by the Judge in the way of jurisprudential law, may be fixed upon as the cause of the injustice: negative, where it is only to the want of some article of law not as yet established, but of which it is conceived that it might, and without preponderant inconvenience, be established by the legislator, established, that the habit or course supposed to exist in the shape in question may, it is supposed, be traced.

+  Go on with the case in which the distinction is not perceptible.
Similar Items
  • Title: [5 July 1804 Procedure and Evidence]
    Description: 5 July 1804

    Procedure and Evidence

    B. Evils causes

    Ch.1 Generalia

    2. natural and factitious

    Division of the factitious causes of injustice into negative and positive or say affirmative: negative consisting in the omission of such obviously necessary arrangements for the furtherance of justice or the prevention of injustice (as seem pointed out by the plainest common sense) as seem incapable of escaping the mind when are suggested by the ------ of things /circumstances/ /incidents/ by which the demand for them is produced: positive, consisting in the opposing of some positive bar, for instance by the actual prohibition, to the /some/ /an/ /making of some/ arrangement which, were it not for such a prohibition, would be taken, by the spontaneous act of the party or individual in question, with or without any thing /act/ done by the legislator to promote it.

    Omission to employ the requisite means (compulsory and /or/ in--latory or both) for proving[?] the attendance of a witness liable to be unwilling, may be given for an example of a negative factitious cause of injustice. Refusal to permitt a person of that description to serve at the seat of judicature in the character of a witness may, in the supposition that the grounds of such refusal is not sufficient, be given for an example of a positive factitious cause of injustice.
  • Title: [5 July 1804 Procedure & Evidence]
    Description: 5 July 1804

    Procedure & Evidence

    Evils

    2d order

    7 or 1. vexation the immediate causes

    III II /III/ Factitious causes 1. negative

    1. Factitious /negative/ causes of delay: which see

    1. Factitious /negative/ causes of the intricacy or any complication of the system of procedure.

    III. i.e. Factitious causes 2. positive.

    i. Positive causes of delay which see

    4 Labour of mind and loss of time (as above), as in the natural course of things would have been necessary to be taken but have been rendered so by appointment of positive law. The greater the number and variety of these steps, the greater the degree of complication /complexity/ or intricacy in the system of procedure. For the causes of complexity and thence of intricacy see further on -

    5. Anxiety of mind, by reflection on the uncertainty of the event of the cause, and in the ---- of the arrangements to be taken for the rendering it favourable - even in so far as that uncertainty, and the complexity of these arrangements, have received encrease from the operation of factitious causes.

    N.B. In proportion as professional advice and assistance is called in, the vexation in respect of labour of mind will frequently be diminished, but the evil of expence (of which further on) will constantly be encreased.
  • Title: [9 May 1808 I. Reasons Ch.II]
    Description: 9 May 1808

    I. Reasons

    Ch.II. Law & Pleadings simul facile

    §.1. Simul facile erunt sub lege

    1. Instrument of demand must be adapted to subst. law.

    2. Substant. law must be adapted to instrument of demand.

    3. Titles and countertitles must be provided in Code with short names, by which they may be designated in the Formulary.

    4. To encrease the conformity, legislator ought to draw up the instruments.

    Ch.II. Substantive Law and Instruments of Pleading ought to be worked up together.

    §.1. Correspondency of which they are susceptible to be given to them under Statutory law.

    1. Suppose, in any part of the field of law, a portion of substantive law already created, a portion of law conferring on persons of such or such a description a certain mass of rights, in the event of their having to produce in their favour a sufficient title to those {rights, the effect of such positive title not being destroyed by any negative one}, an instrument of demand, will, if it be adapted to its purposes as above delineated + should, it is evident, be made exactly comparable to the correspondent portion of substantive law. On this, as on all other occasions this title he makes must include a positive part and a negative part: in making out the positive part he must assert the existence in his favour of some one at least in the list of causes creative of title established in that character in the corresponding part of the Code: to assist the negative part he must deny the existence of every article on the list of causes destructive of title established in the Code in that character.

    2. This rule is of course pursued in a certain degree, though in a manner far from being the most commodious, in English practice. Where an Action is grounded on a particular Statute, in the instrument of demand, called here the declaration, reference is made to the statute: where an Indictment is grounded on a Statute, as the instrument of demand called here the Indictment, reference is also made to the Statute: and in both cases not only a designation is given of the corresponding portion of substantive law in which the demand thus grounds itself is required to be given and given accordingly, but between the wording of the text of the law and the wording of the instrument of demand a certain mode and degree of conformity is exacted[?], a negation being put upon the demand, put by the Judge, in case of failure.

    + Ch.I. §.2.