date

16 May 1808 I. Reasons Ch.V
16 May 1808

I. Reasons

Ch.V. Advantages

§.9./8./ Fiction ousted

Into Scottish judicature the English Jury trial as bestowed upon English pleading could not be imported but that fiction - that is if not the practice, the result and produce of the practice, would be imported along with it: imported, and by wholesale; nothing in the whole system of pleading being done without it: for the short but not less true account of the matter, if on such a matter the truth may be spoken, is - the whole system of procedure - of Common Law procedure - is one great lie. But once more, the importation of English pleading into Scotland is impossible.

On the present occasion this truth may be acknowledged without much difficulty, Scotch lawyers not having been attached to the use of fiction by habit and prejudice, will not naturally be disposed to regard the exclusion put upon it by the proposed plan as a loss. Fictions of English growth nothing hinders them from viewing in a true light: for fictions of Scottish growth, even were[?] the cast[?] favourable to them, which it never has been, the season is too late.
Similar Items
  • Title: [14 May 1808 Ch.V. §.8. I. Reasons]
    Description: 14 May 1808

    Ch.V. §.8.

    I. Reasons

    Ch.V. Advantages

    §.8. Fiction ousted

    §.8./7./ Advantage the 7 th. Exclusion of the practice of judicial fiction.

    Another result which in England a man could not place to the account of advantage with any thing like a firm assurance of seeing its claim to that appellation generally admitted.

    The fictions that constitute throughout the interspersed mixture with which the defence of English common law procedure has been constructed, have without any exception taken their rise in this mode. Purposing to usurp a power which he was conscious did not belong to him by his constitutional superior to be entrusted to him, the Judge makes use of an untruth, devises some untruth, and employs it as an instrument to disguise the usurpation and give safety and effect to it: stating upon the occasion as having place, some supposed matter of fact which to his knowledge has not place: viz. some imaginary event, or state of things which supposing it to have place, would afford a justification for the act of power exercised, but which not having place, affords in truth no such justification.
  • Title: [16 May 1808 I. Reasons Ch.V]
    Description: 16 May 1808

    I. Reasons

    Ch.V. Advantages

    §.8./7./ Fiction ousted

    When the system of Scottish procedure began to develop itself, neither the need of any such instruments presented itself in any thing like equal degree, nor the facilities for using.

    1. Not the need of them. For being little embarassed by Parliaments, the Court of Session, the child and instrument of Royal power, found little difficulty in the pursuit of whatever happened to be its own views - that is, the views of the majority of that comparatively numerous judicatory, without recourse to fraud in either of those or in any other shapes.

    If a word was wanting, nobile officium served for everything.

    5./2./ Not the facility: for by this time, the Common mind had advanced to[?] [...?] too high a state of maturity to afford a prospect of success to frauds of so gross a texture. The dawn of religious liberty had begun to give its vigour to the public mind. No imposture too gross concealed from detection by the combined force of interest and interest-begotten prejudice. The Priests of the Grand Laws[?] proclaim the immortality of their ever changing God. English Lawyers proclaim the innocence and meritoriousness of iniquity under the name of nullification, and of lying under the name of fiction.

    6. The Roman Law &c

    7. In the case of the Scottish judicatory the populousness of that judicatory, and the parties into which it was in consequence habitually divided, were of themselves circumstances sufficient to throw obstruction in the way of any persevering and consistent system of fraud and artifice. Devised by one party, a law would have been denounced as such and protected against by another.
  • Title: [12[?] May 1808 Ch.V. §.6. I]
    Description: 12[?] May 1808

    Ch.V. §.6.

    I. Reasons

    Ch.V. Advantages

    §.6./5./ Special Pleading ousted

    4. Advantage the fourth /fifth/. Exclusion of special pleading.

    1. This effect, advantageous or not, this effect is the necessary result of the exclusion of new cases:

    Of the advantage looked for in Scotland from the introduction of English Jury trial, in comparison of the present mode of judicature, the mode of practice most frequently exemplified, the practice according to which the decision is grounded upon proof taken operating in affirmance or disaffirmance of some proposition usually of a general description, as in the case where the general issue is pleaded the practice that obtains in the case where a general issue is thus pleaded is naturally looked to as the source. What in England is called Special Pleading, is what in Scotland or[?] wherever[?] of Jury trial would scarce regard with approbation or, at any rate with preference. It would present itself as too near kin to Southern[?] practice. On this occasion therefore as on so many others, England being out of the question in[?] Scotland the exclusion that would of course be put upon that dilatory experience and vexatious modification of Jury trial procedure, would probably without much difficulty be admitted upon the advantage side of the account.