date

10 May 1808 Note I. Reasons
10 May 1808

Note

I. Reasons

Ch.1.

§.2.

Ablative incidents

In the framing of the respective lists of influencing circumstances as above, much will depend upon the structure and usage of the particular language employed.

1. In English several wrongs will be found that admitt of no justification: but this peculiarity is the result not of the nature of the case, but of the nature of the language. Thus Murder will admitt of no justification: - why? because the non-existence of every circumstance to which that effect is by law allowed is included in the import of the term - in what Locke would have called the nominal essence of the offence.

In this case are several others in the technically legal part of the English language: for example Larceny, and Rape.

2. Whether the term extenuation or the term aggravation be employed will depend again upon the nature of the language.

Thus in case of homicide. If murder be taken for the simple, the principal, the standard offence, the circumstances that reduce it to manslaughter will come in, in the character of extenuations: if manslaughter be taken for the standard offence, circumstances that raise it to the rank of murder will come in in the character of aggravations.

In one language a wrong shall be raised into an offence of a different denomination by a circumstance of aggravation which in another language shall not be productive of that effect. In England where the author of the death is servant or wife of whose death he or she is considered as contributing, the offence is raised from the denomination of Murder to that of Petty treason, and the punishment accordingly receives what is regarded as an enhancement. In Roman law as in Roman language no such effect by either of these circumstances.

On the contrary, where the author of the death stood in the relation of son or daughter to him to whose death he or she is considered as contributing the offence is raised from the denomination of homicide to that of parricide a change of denomination, a correspondent change in the punishment was engrafted. Parricide from the Roman imported into the English language, have not been admitted into the language of English law.
Similar Items
  • Title: [10 May 1808 I. Reasons Ch.I]
    Description: 10 May 1808

    I. Reasons

    Ch.I

    §.3. Certainty

    In the instances of several groupes of offences, so variable or so faint are the lines of separation by which the offences in the same group are distinguished from one another, that although after the evidence has been delivered, there will be no doubt that one or other of them has been committed, yet, till the evidence has been thoroughly sifted and considered, and even after all the consideration that can be given of it, it may still be doubtful which.

    Instances of these groupes are

    1. {Murder and Manslaughter

    2[?]. So again[?] among wrongs affecting person, Disablement, Disfigurement and Mutilation: distinctions natural in themselves but unknown to lawyers' language.

    3. {In the popular deportment of the language} Theft, Fraudulent obtainment and Embezzlement.

    4[?]. {again} Destruction and Deterioration[?] both of them as applied to things moveable or unmoveable, considered as the subject-matters of property.

    4. Instead of both, Blackstone employs malicious mischief: an improper term since malice is not a necessary accompaniment of the production of either of those pernicious effects.

    5. {In the popular deportment again} Extortion and Robbery.
  • Title: [1818 Jan y 6 Not Paul 72]
    Description: 1818 Jan y 6

    Not Paul

    72

    III Doctrine

    Ch Asceticism

    6

    Other remedies

    §. 2. 6 Infanticide

    §. 2. vi Power of breeding-up or not, during early

    infancy.

    §. 2. vi. On the part of the mother Possession and

    exercise of the power of life and death over early infancy

    It is in this case in comparison of all the others that the confederated dæmons have

    pursued their joint purpose with most savage barbarity and most extensive effect.

    Deceived or pretending to be deceived by the external colour of the case, the man of

    law has in the scale of punishment raised to the level / pitch / of the most

    murderous crimes this innoxious remedy. Child murder is the name / appellative /

    which has been fastened upon it: and by this misnomer all the mischiefs / evils /

    which attach / are attendant / upon homicide in the / its / most atrocious /

    flagitious / of its forms have been and continue to be but too successfully imputed

    to an operation purely remedial which is not followed by any one of them.

    It is to the mass of evil / evils /, distinguished by Bentham under the name of

    evils of the second order that in the case where it is treated as an offence

    homicide, like / similar in this to / every other offence against individuals as he

    has shewn is indebted for by far the greatest part of its mischievousness /

    mischievous effects. JB footnote at this

    point: ‘Introd. Dum’. See Introduction to the Principles of

    Morals and Legislation, 1996 ( CW), pp. 143-52; Traités de Législation, i. 81-8. ???

    Mischief of the second order, composed of / consisting in / danger and alarm: danger, the

    probability of the repetition / indefinitely reiterated production / of the like

    mischief; alarm, pain of apprehension produced by the prospect

    of that danger.
  • Title: [27 Jan 1809 . View P 2 Paley? Reason]
    Description: 27 Jan 1809 . View P 2

    Paley? Reason for English practice cases meet for capital punishment depend on circumstances impossible to be defined till after the offence has been committed

    "The better of which two methods (continues the Reverend

    Doctor) "has been long adopted in this country, where, of those

    "who receive sentence of death scarcely one in ten is executed

    Such is the statement germ of the practice:

    and worse, under the notice of an indication of the

    by which the conduct of the authors creators and preservers of this state of

    things may have been determined, comes a justification of

    it

    "And the preference of this to the former method (as if there

    "were no other) seems to be founded on the consideration, that

    "the selection of proper subjects for capital punishment principally

    "depends upon circumstances, about, however easy to perceive

    "in each particular case after the crime is committed, it

    "is impossible to enumerate or define beforehand; in to

    "ascertain however with that exactness which is requisite

    in legal description."

    "The propriety of inflicting mode of punishment he depends depending depends principally

    to upon circumstances which it is impossible to

    "enumerate or define beforehand! or at any rate at least to ascertain

    "with that exactness which is requisite in legal descriptions!

    This is as much as to say that it is impossible for the business

    of punishment to be carried or had by powers compleatly arbitrary.

    The circumstances in which the propriety of a lot of punishment which has

    been inflicted depends — impossible to enumerate or define

    beforehand! and yet there some circumstance easy to

    perceive after the crime has been is committed! A Nero or

    a Caligula, if it were an object with them to find a justification

    for their barbarities, would it be possible for them to dwell

    as

    or wish for a theory that should set them more compleatly at their ease?

    3 By the help of this doctrine, which supposes that In the administration of penal law, it is necessary Judges should be invested with arbitrary power the atrocities of Nero & Caligula or any other atrocities may find their justification