date

18 May 1808 Ch. V. § I. Reasons
18 May 1808

Ch. V. §

I. Reasons

Ch.V. Advantages

§.│ │ Jury trial extended

§.│ │ Advantage the │ │. Jury trial extended. {The extent given to Jury trial not limited as in England.}{The extent given to Jury trial increased.}

1. I mean not on this occasion to attempt to prejudge the question whether under any, and if on any on what conditions it be desirable that Jury trial in

civile should be received in Scotland. If Jury trial be admitted, the object of this plan is to give the utmost extent possible to the advantages derivable from it - to reduce within the narrowest pitch possible whatever inconveniences may be liable to result from it.

If Jury trial be not admitted, the object is, so to order matters, that the want of it be as little felt as possible.

But if upon the whole the influence of it be advantageous to justice, I speak always of Scotland, the object should be to give to that beneficial influence whatever extent it may be susceptible of. In England the benefit of it is confined to causes of certain particular sorts of causes. But if with equal benefit to justice it be applicable to causes of other descriptions, any disadvantage which it may have happened in England to labour under in this respect, affords no reason why Scotland should be subjected to the same disadvantage.
Similar Items
  • Title: [24 May 1808 Jury analysed,]
    Description: 24 May 1808

    Jury analysed,

    4 Ch. 3. Principal Utilities

    §.2 — their importance Penal cases afford the most remarkable exemplification of this utility But of cases, penal in nature, though civil in name, the number & influences is important. These advantages, it is true, depend more obviously,

    and indeed probably in a considerably greater degree on the application

    of Jury trial to causes of the penal

    class, in so far as they are capable of being distinguished a distinction in nature accompanies the distinction

    in name than in its application to non-penal called civil causes.

    But in a constitutional view its influence, as

    applied to these civil causes is at once too extensive and multifarious

    to be readily estimated, and much too great to be

    safely neglected.

    The constitutional efficacy of Jury trial extended to Scotland, by its efficacy in England. Of this part of its influence Scotland, it may be

    remarked on the other side, has never had the benefit.

    Besides, that as to this, by far the most important of the benefits of Jury trial, Scotland enjoys it. But Scotland being the minor kingdom, the constitution

    enjoyed in Scotland has been the constitution

    formed in England: formed in the major kingdom, the

    constitution of which had had the full benefit of Jury trial

    in its application as well to civil as to criminal

    causes

    On the other hand again, this constitutional benefit —

    by far the most important of the benefits which it is

    in the power of Jury trial to confer and, secure — this

    principal benefit, Scotland has all along possessed, and would

    welcome to possess without the extension of this mode of

    trial to civil causes — to any causes other than those

    to which in Scotland it extends at present.
  • Title: [19 May 1808 I. Reasons Ch.V]
    Description: 19 May 1808

    I. Reasons

    Ch.V. Advantages

    §.│ │ Jury Trial extended

    11. In these the ordinary Courts Jury trial was employed: in the extraordinary ones it was not employed. But from this difference in actual practice, let it not be supposed that any corresponding difference in point of reason and utility had place, or by the common superordinate of these Judges of all classes had ever been supposed to have place. {Comprehensiveness of design - unity of plan - consistency[?] - every thing of this sort has at all times been unknown to English law.} By Common Law Judges Jury trial was employed, because they had been bred up under it, were accustomed to it, and knew not how to go on without it. By Roman Law, called Civil law Judges of the above three classes Jury trial was not employed because they had not been bred up under it, were not accustomed to it, and did not wish for any such clog[?].

    12. Had it been the fortune of these Civilians, or Civil lawyers as they are called, to have been bred up in the English Common Law Courts, the causes now termed Equity causes, Ecclesiastical causes and Admiralty causes would have been subjected to the cognizance of a Jury (with perhaps an exception to a certain extent in the case of the Admiralty causes).

    Had it been the fortune of the Common Law Judge to have been bred up under judicatories judging Roman Law practice, the sorts of causes now tried by Juries would, in England, have been tried by Judges without Juries, in England as in Scotland, and almost every where else.
  • Title: [29 April 1808 §.14. I. Reasons]
    Description: 29 April 1808

    §.14.

    I. Reasons for the Work

    §.14. Jury Trial improvable

    §. │ │ By the simplicity and clearness thus given to the state of the question, Jury trial would to the extent of the application given to it in Scotland, be employed in a state nearer approaching to perfection than at present it is in England.

    1. Whatsoever beneficial effects may be or be supposed to be attached, in fact, to Jury Trial as conducted in English practice, will be found referable either to the mode of procedure connected with it, or to the composition of the judicatory. Those which stand attached to the mode of procedure ought to be placed to that account, and not to that of the composition of the judicatory, unless in such instances, if any, in which the advantages attached to the mode of procedure, could not be given to it under a judicatory any otherwise composed.

    2. If in Jury trial there be any beneficial points exclusively attached to the composition of the judicatory they can attach no otherwise than in proportion to the magnitude of the share which the Jury really possess and habitually exercise in the determination of the decision, the verdict as it is called, which passes under their name.