1
results found in
26 ms
Page 1
of 1
[lxxxiv. 22]
1821 Dec. 6
Codification Proposal
penult¼o
?.5. Draughtsman single
II. Relation between
Monarchs and Aristocrats
interest
In a Monarchy Relation between the interest of the Monarch and the interest of an Aristocracy, the situation of which is subordinate to his.
That of money forced from the people its share may be as large as possible, its interest is that the sources from which or channels through which it is drawn from the people be as numerous and each of them as copious as possible. These are
1. Useful and needful Offices, with masses of emolument as excessive as possible
2. Needless do with do: needless: i.e. of offices in themselves not useless, a number over and above what is sufficient Suppose a hundred Offices occupying each of them no more than the half of a man's time: fifty of them are needless
3. Useless Offices with do, ie actual service /functions/ attached to them but that /these/ service /functions/ useless
4 Sinecure Offices with do. Offices in name only, without any functions attached. Only by impunity and insolence does the Sinecurist differ from the swindler who is punished with ignominious punishment for obtaining money on false pretence.
5. In the case of all Offices, in which /Official functions to the apt discharge of the functions of which/ appropriate aptitude in the articles /respect/ of intellectual aptitude and active talent are necessary, the nature of the case furnishes tests as conclusive as those by which progress in literature /learning/ as taught in Schools and Universities is proved or disproved. His interest is that no such tests be employed: for the effect would be partly to exclude his associates and connections, or to impose upon them the necessity of a quantity of labour, by the burthen of which the value of the official situation will /would/ be diminished.
6. That offices of all sorts may be as abundant as possible, in regard to ”war• his interest is that it be as continual, as extensive and as expensive as possible.
7. For the same reason, in regard to distant dependencies, his interest is that they be as distant extensive, as abundant, and as expensive as possible. His interest is that war may abound were it only that by conquest or cession, distant dependencies may abound. His interest is that distant dependencies may abound, were it only that war may abound: distant dependencies give occasion for war for the defence of the country incidentally against foreign adversaries, and constantly against its inhabitants.
A contract is a sort of temporary office with temporary functions consisting in the furnishing of things or the services of persons to be employed as alledged for the use of the community under the direction of its /the/ rulers.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 186] 1822 Feb. 25]Description: [lxxxiv. 186] 1822 Feb. 25 Codification Offer 40 20 Notes ?.5 VI 2. (a) Sections or branches of the Aristocratical interest. Interest of 1. the Legislative Aristocracy. 2. the Executive or say Official Aristocracy. 3. The Lawyer Aristocracy. 4.© the titled Aristocracy constituted by factitious dignity. 5.© the ancestry Aristocracy 6© the moneyed Aristocracy. 7.© the ancestry Aristocracy. 8.© the literary Aristocracy. 9. the Fine©Arts Aristocracy. 10. of the Spiritual Aristocracy. Under a Monarchy, no one of all these branches of the Aristocratical interest being able to advance itself of itself, all of them cluster round the Monarchical interest, and add their force to the force by which it is enabled to carry on the sinister sacrifice. (b) 1. Emolument of useless Offices: © of Offices useless in their nature. 2 © of needless Offices: needless because superfluous, 3. and 4. of do Commissions © [...?] the functions temporary: including Contracts for supply of goods or labour. 5. and 6 Sine©cure Offices and Commissions. 6. and 7. Overpay of useful and needful Offices and Commissions. 7. Pensions. 8. Donations © by a sum over [?] paid. 8. Pay, even though not excessive, of Offices and Commissions that are neither useless nor needless. This though it belongs not to the subject matter of waste, is not the less, in so far as by the functionaries in question, looked for at the hands in question, part and parcel of the matter of corruptive influence. 9. Power in all its accompanied or not accompanied with emolument. 10. Factitious dignity in all its shapes (c) Examples. 1. Ensigns of opulence in all its shapes, as above. 2. Ensigns of power in all their shapes.. 3. Ensigns of factitious dignity; with or without opulence and power respectively: Crowns, Thrones, Septres; Coronets; Ribbons, Stars, Crosses, Armorial bearings /ensigns/: Titles i.e. honorary appellations of all sorts Of all these ensigns the effect or tendency as well as the object is to cause the possessor to be regarded as being in a higher degree than ordinary worthy the affection and respect of all the several members of the community
-
Title: [19 Sept 1815 Parl. Ref. Necessity]Description: 19 Sept 1815 Parl. Ref. Necessity The American war. Of the thinking and not unduly biased part of the population - out of Parliament and even in Parliament - was, from the first, against the American war. Why? Because to speak on technical principles and in technical language in the British Parliament the Americans were not fairly represented: because on the principle of utility - in natural and rational language, the interests of the ruling few would not, in the event of the taxing of America in a British /an European/ Parliament be coincident /concordant/ with but adverse to that part /portion/ of the subject many/. But as it is, with the exception of a comparatively small /minute/ portion in Great Britain and Ireland taken together to speak on technical principles and in technical language, the subject many are no more /as far from being/ fairly represented as were the people of the American Colonies: to speak on the principle of utility and in natural and rational language, in the most essential particulars the interests of the ruling few are not coincident /concordant/ with but adverse to those of the subject many:- yes those of the whole of the subject many. It is the interest of the ruling few that there should be as many offices of all sorts as possible, and those as highly paid as possible, filled with as many idle men and as many incapable men as possible, with as many sinecures as possible. For the sake of giving to the number of these offices as possible, that there should be as many wars, and those as long[?] and as expensive as possible and as many dependencies as possible and those as burthensome and that they may be as burthensome, as distant as possible: with an allowance to the chief of the State as high as possible. But it is the interest of the subject many that as consistently /so far as consistent/ with the good of the service, the number of offices should be as small, and those as low paid as possible, with as many capable and as highly capable men in them, and as few idle men in them as possible: i.e. as above.
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 173] 1822 Feb. 14]Description: [lxxxiv. 173] 1822 Feb. 14 Codification Offer. ?.5 V. 2 No sooner is any such mixt system in existence, than the influence of the people and with it the welfare /influence/ of the people is diminished at both ends The representatives of the people can not by their own single power extract for their own use any of the /those/ instruments of felicity at the expence of the people. But either for their own use or what comes to the same thing for the use of their connections, with the concurrence of the Monarch they through the medium of one or other of the several possessions above mentioned can extract them in any quantity. Money in particular they can thus obtain in any or all of the four several forms: necessary emolument attached in necessary quantity to Offices and Commissions useful and at the same time needful: money attached to these same possessions in a quantity neither needful nor useful: money /pecuniary emolument/ attached to Offices and Commissions which though not useless in their natures are in respect of their number needless: money attached to Offices which though not without functions annexed are altogether useless: money attached to Offices without functions called in English /England/ where they are so abundant ”Sinecures•. At the disposal of the Monarch, to a vast amount on the whole are in the least expensive Monarchy, good gifts /things/ in all these several forms. But to place in the hands of any such irremovable and irresponsible functionary in any considerable quantity while the Members of the body of the Representatives of the people whose concurrence is necessary to every law and every considerable measure /exercise/ of the functions of the Executive department are in a condition by their own hands or other hands which are virtually their own to receive them or to establish a fund of corruptive influence /for the corruption of those same Agents and Trustees of the subject many/.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1