1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
[lxxxiv. 41]
1821 Decr 13
Codification Proposal
Appendix
Sinister Interests etc
II. Interest©begotten prejudices.
If the influence of particular interests [...?...?] with and consequently /thus/ adverse to the universal interest is /may with propriety be termed/ sinister, so is /may/ the several correspondent interest©begotten prejudices. In whatsoever mode /shape/ and degree the sinister interest tends to promote the sinister sacrifice, in the same mode and degree does the correspondent interest©begotten prejudice tend /operate/ to the same sinister end.
When the operation of the sinister interest as such is considered, the state of the understanding /intellectual faculty/ is not considered. Of the will /volitional faculty/ only is the state considered: of the will as determined /being/ in respect of the direction taken by it /in which it acts/ determined by the forces which in a direct manner operate upon it in a direct manner, namely the eventual expectation of pleasures [?] pains [?], and the corresponding desires producing the effect of ”motive•.
In so far as it is in the operation of interest©begotten prejudices that the course taken by the will and the active faculties has its immediate cause, the understanding /state of the intellectual faculties/ © the judgment has received its determination from the unperceived operation of the will. Where it is by the force of interest alone that a man is led into a course /line/ of action adverse to the greatest happiness of the greatest number he sees that self©regard is the efficient cause of his action and that social regard either has no place in his [...?] or is sacrificed /overpowered/ by self©regard: where it is by the force of interest©begotten prejudice that the effect /course of action/ is produced, the case is either that the sinister influence of his conduct on the greatest happiness is not perceived by him /present to his perception/ or that some how or other not that but some other is regarded by him presents itself to his mind as the proper end of Government.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 77] 1821 May 11 /Decr 22]Description: [lxxxiv. 77] 1821 May 11 /Decr 22/ Codification Offer ?.5. Draughtsman Single /Members Unapt/ This [...?] immediately after the analysis of sinister interests The desirable thing would have been to have brought to view the several particular directions in which these several causes of aberration act in such sort as to the divert the course of the individual in question from the line of the appropriate aptitude © from that line which leads to the greatest happiness of the greatest number: to show in detail the several sinister courses which the individual is thereby led to pursue: Time, space and the object and nature of this address forbid concurr in opposing a bar to the the execution of any such task, concurr in excluding from this place an exposition which in length would be disproportionate and in respect of relevancy not exclusively appropriate. Suffice it here: to observe, to observe with reference to every one of them, whatever they may be in detail they concurr in this one point namely in operating all of them in opposition to the only legitimate end of government. Of prejudices whether interest©begotten or authority begotten the influence is one point of view more sinister more mischievous than even that of sinister interest in any of its shapes: their operation © their evil operation © is more extensive. To the number of the persons exposed to the action of sinister interest there are certain limits: it consists of those and those only who in their own conception at least know /possess/ a share in the benefit in question © in the benefit by the [...?] exploitation of which whether in respect of acquisition or retention the sinister interest is created. But to the number of the persons exposed to the influence of sinister prejudice whether interest begotten or authority begotten and even interest©begotten there are no such nor any other limits The interest is capable of being removed © removed in an instant by appropriate operations, the prejudice with its sinister force is not capable of being removed by the operations of those or any other promptly acting instruments. Only by reasoning, by argument can it be removed: and the operation of argument is always uncertain, and at the best but slow.ÁÁ
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 143] 1822 Feb. 5 Codification]Description: [lxxxiv. 143] 1822 Feb. 5 Codification Offer Not 40 employed ?.5. Admission Universal III Members /[...?]/ unapt In the case of an all comprehensive Code such as the one here proposed the field of action, be it remembered is a field in which that /the action/ of all imaginable /possible/ sinister interests as well as interest©begotten prejudices are included /is in force/.ÁÁ
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 80] 1821 Decr 26 Codification]Description: [lxxxiv. 80] 1821 Decr 26 Codification Proposal ?.5 Admission Universal III Aptitude and Inaptitude Prejudice England Now A word as to interest©begotten prejudice Though among prejudice the most mischievous prejudices would not perhaps have had existence had it not been for the corresponding sinister interests, yet especially when considered as /the character of/ a cause of inaptitude with reference to the work in question /it may happen to a/ prejudice in this or that shape may perhaps be found more powerful in its action, and thence more pernicious than the corresponding sinister interest. To the number of those who are capable of possessing a share in a sinister interest, the /there are certain /determinate/ limits: limits applied by the/ very nature of the case opposes certain limits: for suppose it shared in by the greatest number of the members of the community an /the/ interest is by the supposition by the very definition not a sinister but a right and proper interest. But to the number of the persons capable of being under the dominion of a prejudice, whether interest©begotten or inbred, there are absolutely no limits other than those which /which apply to/ the number of the members of the whole community. In England it is by their own sinister interest that in England all Monarchs have been /of course been at all times/ led to sacrifice to that particular and thence sinister interest the interest of all the rest of the community /their fellow Citizens/. It is by a conjunct sinister interest that their several subordinates in the several departments of government have at all times by the possession or prospect of shares in the profit of the sacrifice been at all times led /prompted/ to give support and encrease to that same sinister sacrifice. It is by that same interest that they have been led to nourish in their own breasts the corresponding prejudice by which this sinister sacrifice is /never ceases to be/ represented as a right and proper one: At the time of James II In all these minds by the sinister interest was begotten the desire and endeavour to sacrifice to the particular and sinister interest of the ruling one for his own benefit and that of the few that were ruling under him, the interest of the many. By that same sinister interest was begotten in an unascertainable but probably not inconsiderable proportion of these same minds, the prejudice according to which this same sinister sacrifice was a right and proper sacrifice: and that accordingly it was in /on/ the instance /part/ of every individual matter of duty to contribute by obedience and obsequiousness without reserve, to the utmost of his power, to that same sinister sacrifice: a duty the fulfilment of which had for its enforcement the three great Sanctions, the popular or moral, as well as the political, and still more unreservedly than the political, the religious.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1