[lxxxiv. 111]

1822 Jany 21

Codification Offer

ult¼o

? 5 Admission Universal

Vain /Unavailing/ in any country whatsoever would be the plea /excuse/ of him who should say © To what use publish /make public/ any such invitation? by no one will it be accepted. Vain indeed: for in neither case will the invitation be void of /without its/ use. If accepted by any one then, by the supposition it has its use. /is followed by use./ If not accepted by any one, the constituted legislators have done their part, and the glory of this /so transcendent magnaminous and conspicuous an/ act of self denial and self©sacrifice is their reward. If accepted by any, let the degree of inaptitude manifested by the best of them be ever so flagrant, /flagrant © suppose for argument sake that there is not in any one of them so much as a single point of useful information visible ©/ still will they not be without their use. The more conspicuous the comparative inaptitude of the unofficial Draughtsman the more conspicuous /illustrious whatever may be the amount /[...?]/ /degree/ of it/ is the comparative aptitude of the official draughtsman: by the contrast whatsoever may be the merit of his work, by the contrast it is placed in the most advantageous light possible.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[lxxxiv. 116] 1822 Jany 22]
    Description: [lxxxiv. 116]

    1822 Jany 22

    ult¼o

    ?5

    If by any Government professing liberal opinions professing the taking for the end©in©view of its measures the greatest happiness of the greatest number ie the object /end/ to the attainment of which its measures are directed © if by any such Government after the notice given by this paper has come under its eye this measure of universal invitation be omitted to be employed © if instead of it the close mode of legislation be employed the omission will be a certificate that the greatest happiness of the greatest number is not taken by such Government for the end in view to the attainment of which its measures are directed: that its professions in that particular are not sincere: that it is not by regard for universal interest that its measures are determined, but by a regard for an interest opposite to that universal interest © by a regard for the particular and sinister interest of the majority /greater/ or the most influential portion of those among whom the powers of government are shared.

    That, antecedently to the receipt of such notice, the close mode should have been pursued, is /was/ altogether natural: for whatsoever after having been continues to be customary, can not be otherwise than natural: natural and in so far as custom excuses /absolves/ /covers/ from blame, unblamable /blameless/. But customariness is not the same thing with contributoriness to the greatest happiness of the greatest number: and when notice of this has been received, the apology /plea/ which custom makes is gone: and the proof of insincerity and of a disposition demonstrative of a breach of trust on the part of the Governors if not of inaptitude in the form of government with reference to the greatest happiness of the greatest number, remains /is/ conclusiveÁÁ
  • Title: [[lxxxiv. 115] 1822 Jany 21]
    Description: [lxxxiv. 115]

    1822 Jany 21

    Codification Offer

    ult¼o

    ?.5 Admission Universal

    Of the repugnance /strenuousness/ with which a proposal to this effect is opposed by the current of particular interest in the situation of constituted legislator no one can be more intensely sensible than he is by whom it is thus brought forward. Experience however has shewn that acceptance is not every where and absolutely impossible: and in conjunction with acceptance given or not given to the offer of a rationale, acceptance given or not given to this proposal for the throwing open the door of the legislative Assembly to original draughts from all hands without exception may be stated as as a most instructive /searching/ test of appropriate aptitude on the part of a member of that body, and the rejection of /opposition to/ both not to say of /to/ either a proof altogether conclusive of relative inaptitude. It is an avowal of the uncontrouled predominance of sinister interest in his breast: it is a declaration as plain as it is in the power of words to give of a disregard of /for/ the greatest happiness of the greatest number: of a determination so far as depends upon him to give the utmost copiousness possible to the sinister sacrifice.
  • Title: [1817 Nov r 28 Not Paul II.]
    Description: 1817 Nov r 28

    Not Paul

    II. Doctrine

    Ch. In Jesus

    §.3. Practice

    Irr

    But upon the face of it—and taking the whole account for a correct account of what passed—what bearing will it be seen to have upon the sort of connection which according to the interpretation here in question had place between Jesus and his favourite disciple?—None whatever: at least to any but the most superficial view.

    As Lot is sitting in the gate of this city, two persons called Angels make their appearance: he gives them an invitation to a supper and night’s lodging at his house: the offer is accepted. After supper, and before they lay down, comes a mixt multitude old and young, and calling to Lot insist upon it that these two male beings whatever they were shall be given up to be known as the phrase is by force. Rather than be accessary /consenting/ to so flagrant /atrocious/ a breach of the laws of hospitality—laws which in the early stages of society possess a degree of importance and influence such as it is difficult in a state of society such as ours to form a conception—he offers to abandon to their outrage /his own/ two virgin daughters of his own: these two virgin daughters of his own who soon after become parties /the heroines/ to so very different an adventure. /an occurrence./ This will not satisfy them. Desirable /Advantageous/ as it might seem to us in our days, the succedaneum does not satisfy them: they persist but in vain. In their human capacity the Angels having pulled their host Lot in and shut the door, in their superhuman capacity they smite with blindness the atrocious multitude both small and great.

    Genesis xix. 1 to

    † In verse 1 Angels: in verses 10. 11. 12, ‘the men.’