1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
[lxxxiv. 127]
1822 Jany 27
Codification Offer
ulto?
?.5. Admission Universal
Members unapt
Sinister interest
adverse to people
Every man is content that every other shall enjoy all such liberty as is not licentiousness: no man is content that any others should enjoy any such liberty as is licentiousness. Licentiousness is all such liberty as a man does not like to see enjoyed by others:
Every man is content that every other /all others/ should enjoy all such liberty as in the view taken by him of his interest is not repugnant /adverse/ to his interest. No man is content that any others should enjoy any such liberty as in the view by him of his interest is repugnant /adverse/ to his interest: all such liberty is in his eyes and his mouth /discourse/ licentiousness.
According to the view which every man takes /taken by each man/ of his interest it is his interest not only that no act be done by which limits are set to his power and to the gratification of his appetite for the matter of wealth and for factitious dignity /reputation/, but that no opinions be manifested which are adverse to his opinion, nor any [...?] which are adverse to his [...?]
It is the interest of a /every/ member of the ruling and influential few that of no misdeeds of his be ever made known /information be possessed/: and that in regard to such as are known no disapprobation be manifested or entertained, nor any comments tending to produce such disapprobation divulgated or made. any such information disapprobation or comment will be licentiousness He will therefore under the name of repressing licentiousness do his utmost towards preventing the existence /the exclusion/ of all such information, mark /token/ of disapprobation, and disapprobation©invoking [?] comment. It will according be his endeavour so to order matters that if possible no such information shall be conveyed, no such disapprobation expressed, no such comments made
In so far as in his eyes that is not possible, that such information as can not be suppressed shall wear an appearance as little as possible unfavorable to him, such disapprobation as is expressed, expressed in the frame and manner least unfavourable to him, such comments as are made and divulgated, expressed in so far as they are unfavorable to him in a form and manner as weak and inefficient as possible.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1822 Jan y 29. 1822 Aug. 6. Constitut]Description: 1822 Jan y 29. 1822 Aug. 6. Constitut. Code. Number Unapt. 35 or 1.| 206 Sinister interests are 1. Modifications (all) of Monarchical interest. 2. Branches (all) of Aristocratical interest. Point to which they all tend — suppression of free political discussion. 36 or 2.| 207 Characteristic and adequate of despotic power is impunity: viz. as to misdeeds which in possessors of the power, would be offences &c. 37 or 3. 208 Compleat, impunity is as against moral as well as political sanction. 38 or 4. |209 Opposed to impunity as against both sanctions is liberty of public political discussion: 1. by indication of misdeeds by them & theirs 2. by comments on d o. 3. by general expressions of disapprobation. 39 or 5. 210 Content that every man should enjoy unlicentious liberty is every man: licentious, no man. Licentious is whatever a man does not like to see enjoyed by others: viz. what in his view is repugnant to his own interest. Number Unapt. 40 or 6. 211 Adverse to his interest in his view of it is every act by which limits are endeavoured to be set to the gratification of his appetite for power, wealth and dignity: or to any opinion or taste of his. 41 or 7. 212 Of every member of the ruling and influential few it is the interest that no misdeed of his be disapproved, commented on, made known: therefore that all manifestation of such disapprobation & be prevented. Prevention compleat impossible, that all be in a form as weak as possible: he and his giving to every thing in his favour a form as strong as possible: he and his giving to every thing in a form as strong as possible.
-
Title: [[xxxiv. 35] 1822 Jany 29 1822 Aug]Description: [xxxiv. 35] 1822 Jany 29 1822 Aug. 6. Codification Offer /Constitut Code/ Securities 5 Moral Counterforce Public Opinion Tribunal To free discussion all adverse Members Unapt Development Securities 5. Moral Counterforce Public Opinion Tribunal Evidence and Comments Members Unapt 35 or 1. 206 Sinister interests are 1. Modifications (all) of Monarchical interest 2. Branches (all) of Aristocratical interest Point to which they all tend - suppression of free political discussion. 36 or 2. 207 Characteristic and adequate │ │ of despotic power is impunity: viz. as to misdeeds which in possessors of the power, would be offences. etc. 37 or 3. 208 Compleat, impunity is as against moral as well as political sanction 38 or 4. 209 Opposed to impunity as against both sanctions is liberty of public political discussion: 1. by indication of misdeeds by them and theirs. 2. by comments on do. 3. by general expressions of disapprobation. 39 or 5. 210 Content that every man should enjoy unlicentious liberty is every man: licentious, no man. Licentious is whatever a man does not like to see enjoyed by others: viz. what in his view is repugnant to his own interest. 40 or 6. 211 Adverse to his interest in his view of it is every act by which limits are endeavoured to be set to the gratification of his appetite for power wealth and dignity: or to any opinion or taste of his. 41 or 7. 212 Of every member of the ruling and influential few it is the interest that no misdeed of his be disapproved, commented on, made known: therefore that all manifestation of such disapprobation etc be prevented. Prevention compleat impossible, that all be in a form as weak as possible: he and his giving to every thing in his favour a form as strong as possible: he and his giving to every thing in │ │ a form as strong as possible.
-
Title: [[**104-060**] 1819 Aug. 8 Fallacies]Description: [**104-060**] 1819 Aug. 8 Fallacies 7 4. Sham-distinguisher's device/ This is the converse of the Lumping-Classifiers device. For the purpose of finding a justification for suppressing the suppression of some course of action which upon the whole has more of usefulness than mischeviousness in it, he presents it to you as distinugishable into two courses, one more useful than mischevious, another more mischevious than useful. Admitt this, he then proceeds in his endeavours to suppress the whole, telling you it is only to the mischevious part that his intention and endeavours are directed. Take for example the liberty of examining into the usefulness or mischeviousness of the several arrangements included under the name of Law, Government, Constitution, &c as above, and the operations performed by the several functionaries in the exercise of their several functions. The liberrty of this examination he will acknowledge to be indisputably necessary to good government: but thou this liberty must be unaccompanied with licentiousness: for licentiousness is as /no less/ hostile to the end in view as /than/ liberty is friendly to it. Whereas between liberty and licentiousness - between the things themselves there is no real distinction: where a mans meaning /[...?]/ is to be considered as friendly to this liberty, liberty is the denomination he employs: where he is /can not but be/ seen to act seen[?] to be in actual hostility hostility disposed towards it licentiousness is the term he employs in speaking of it.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1