date

PRIVATE 15 March 1807 A +
PRIVATE

15 March 1807

A + + (1)

Letter V

Beginning

Of the 17 heads of which the chain of Resolution is composed, these 5 viz: Resolutions 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, have a more particular connection with each other.

Of this part of the plan the general policy, if I apprehended it right, is this:- I mean the ostensible or exterior policy, as presented to Your Lordship by the learned Reformer: for as to the interior policy, that was, or at least may have been, quite a different affair. But Your Lordship will judge.

I speak now of the ostensible policy. To prepare the way for his plan, I figure to myself the learned Reformer addressing himself to Your Lordship to some such effect as follows - Your Lordship knows, and every body knows, to what a degree, and for what a length of time, the House of Lords has been overloaded with

law-business

: the greater part of it made by Appeals from

Scotland

. Now, my Lord, suppose Parliament were to give us a Court of Appeal at

Edinburgh

: if the Judges of it are no others than what we have already, so far there will be no addition to the expence. A great part of the suitors will be satisfied with the decision of that local Court: the greater the better! Suppose, for example, it were but three fourths. Here is the time of the

House of Lords

eased of three fourth parts of the number of

causes

, that now come up to it from Scotland: and, as to the corresponding part of the whole number of

Suitors

, parties to Appeals, though to be sure they will not save the

whole

of the

expence

, yet they will save the

difference

, between the expence of trying the Appeal at home, and that of sending it 400 miles, up to London, to be tried.

Print this in Italics
Similar Items
  • Title: [PRIVATE 15 March 1807 Omitt]
    Description: PRIVATE

    15 March 1807

    Omitt? A Omitt?

    10

    Letter V

    1. Plan

    Ingratitude is so much worse than witchcraft, that I would not willingly impute it to any man, much less a learned Gentleman who has been thus distinguished and dignified by Your Lordship's notice. And yet on this as on so many other occasions I know not how to avoid accusing him of it.

    In the malâ fide suitor Your Lordship's learned Reformer like every other learned Gentleman, might, if he could but persuade himself to open his eyes, and look before him, see in every point of view his best customer. Yet so it is, that from first to last, he knows of no such person, he never saw him in his life. Plunged by practice in the dregs of Brute /Torgas[?]/ and Romulus, the purity of his mind has confined him in idea to Utopia, where there are no suitors but bonâ fide ones.

    Thus it is in regard to the relief held out against the burthens of the Bill-Chamber: liberty, not obligation of refuge to a less dilatory, less vexatious, less expensive plan of judicature for such I find no difficult in supposing it - appeal to Session as now to the Justiciary Court.

    To the bonâ fide suitor, if such be his good fortune to be honestly advised {to be advised to receive advice fraught with impotent learning and with more honesty than that which seems to have fallen to Your Lordship's share} to the bonâ fide suitor were it his lot to come in for a share of it, a very advantageous substitute, a very comfortable relief. His purpose it will suit no doubt. But the malâ fide suitor, how will it suit his purpose? how will his design be forwarded by it: and when they are not, where is the probability, where the moral possibility of his betaking himself to it - that is of his allowing his injured adversaries the benefit of it.
  • Title: [PRIVATE 2 May 1807 H3 + D1]
    Description: PRIVATE

    2 May 1807

    H3 + D1

    Superseded (1)

    Letter V

    Ch.12. Appeal list mutilated

    §.4. Malâ bonâ fide

    In the above figures and proportions may be deduced illustration for divers propositions antecedentally submitted to your Lordship, as well as instruction in other shapes not altogether devoid of use or interest.

    Proportion as between the number of malâ fide Appeals and d o of bonâ fide Appeals - and this for England as well as Scotland - may not this, my Lord, be among the secrets worth knowing?

    My Lord, for England, at any rate, for the three years period abovementioned, it is no longer a secret, nor has it been for these nine years.

    The test lies in the distinction between Appeal not argued and argued. The appeal not argued, therefore in the part of the suitor himself by whom it is presented, presented without prospect of success: viz. so far as concerns the seeing the adverse decision reversed, or in his favour modified. Without prospect of success, then to what end presented? - Answer; for the sake of the profit by delay; that profit, of which so full a view has already been given in general terms, and of which a particular illustration will be submitted to Your Lordship presently.

    The short account of the matter is - Appeals not argued, malâ fide appeals: appeals argued, bonâ fide Appeals.

    The correct account would be (were the correction worth making) - Appeals not argued, all of them malâ fide Appeals to a certainty: Appeals argued the Appeals and the only ones among which bonâ fide ones in a number not ascertainable, would be to be found.
  • Title: [27 July 1806 Scotch Reform /Evidence]
    Description: 27 July 1806

    Scotch Reform /Evidence

    Lett Lawyers adverse

    The substitution of salary to fees, is a practice so solidly grounded in principle, and so compleatly sanctioned by recent and universally approved precedents, that were this /expensive as it is were the expence/ the only difficulty neither opposition nor dissatisfaction could consistently be apprehended: but though this were surmounted, a great part of the opposing force remains unconquered, and perhaps unconquerable.

    Unprecedented as it is, strange as accordingly it may well appear to our English eye, in Scotland, the reform which has the honour of Your Lordship's patronage, originated in /I perceive [...?] law-learned, in/ a judicial brain: in substance I see it proposed, and not proposed only but well advocated by the late Lord [...?], not one of the Judges of the Court of Session, in a pamphlet printed so long ago as in 1789. Even now, if I am rightly informed, it has for its prime [...?] and draughtsman another of the Judges of that locally [...?] as well as superior supreme Court.

    In all this there is nothing out of nature. Ease is provided for /Repose is held out to/ for those to whom ease /repose/ may be desirable: sacrifice is not required of any. Additional Courts require additional Presidents: additional dignity requires additional emolument for its support. I speak not in the way of irony. It is a common place conclusion /argument/, sanctions well applied, sanctions ill applied, never conclusive, to infer public [...?] /mischief/ from individual accommodation. Your Lordship knows how to distinguish: I in my humble sphere do so too. Were my disapprobation of the plan ever so strong, I would leave it to any one else that pleased, to call it a job: if it /reform,/ had not this quality in common with jobs, would not be reconciliable either with policy or with justice.