date

17 July 1807 Scotch Reform
17 July 1807

Scotch Reform

21

2 o

Letter V

IV. Bonâ fide Appeals

To make up the intended number of Judges, viz. 5. in addition to this fourth Judge of whom thus much is known as above, that he is not so likely to understand the business as any of those whose Judgments it is intended he should overrule, comes another of whom, except what must be predicated as above of the Lord Chief Baron nothing more can be predicated, except that which can not but be predicated, viz. that he must be an extraordinary Lord: and to this extraordinary Lord is given a degree of influence by which all the other Lords that are not extraordinary are thrown as it were into the back ground: viz. that which attaches itself of course to the situation of President. What manner of person he is to be is not said: but be he who he may, he is to preside in the same way and manner as the Chancellor of Scotland did preside in the Court of Session by the Constitution of the said Court as enacted by the said Act of the fifth Parliament of James the fifth: that is to say he is to have and exercise not the same sort of power and authority as the President of a Court of Judicature exercises every where else of course; but a particular sort of power for which at the expence of unlearned litigants learned persons are sent to grope in a room without records in it, or what is worse full of half unintelligible, half contradictory records in it, by the light of a rush light, and that carefully covered up under a bushel by the wisdom of ages.
Similar Items
  • Title: [25 Oct r 1807 L d Eldon's Bill]
    Description: 25 Oct r 1807

    L d Eldon's Bill

    '.8.

    Senior Judge

    (│ │) (The Judge presiding in, or in his absence the senior Judge of, the other division)

    In '.2 when the phrase "shall sit at the head of each[?] division was under /among the/ consideration, inconveniences resulting from that rhetorical flourish put instead of shall preside, - its tendency to breed confusion and perplexity was observed. In the present section may be seen a proof. Had the word presiding been there employed, whatsoever were the divisions the absence of a Judge presiding in it was a case that could not here have been to be provided for, being a case that could never[?] happen. To the permanent President absence might happen: but if as often as it happened to the permanent President to be absent a temporary President was to be present, one of the other Judges taking on him /himself/ the character of presiding Judge: the case of the absence of a presiding Judge was a case which could never have place.

    Thus stands the case if to preside in a division and to sit at the head of it /one/ are precisely the same function. Give to the clause in '.2 that construction, there can never be a case in which the presiding Judge can be absent, never be a case in which in the words of '.8. the Senior Judge of the other Division can be to be called in.

    Give now to the clause of '.2. the other construction let presiding in the Division be one function, and sitting at the head of it another, in these terms and those above the clause in '.8 acquires a meaning. By the Judge presiding in the division is to be understood the permanent President, the President in titre, to whom it may happen to be absent /whose absence is one event capable of taking place/ without difficulty . He being absent, in[?] comes the clause in '.8. acquires a meaning and receives its execution and intended effect accordingly. The Senior Judge of this Division, obeys the call, and pays his visit to the other /gives to it from the other/: By /From/ this migration of the Senior Judge no interruption is given to the business of the Court that parts with him? Why no interruption? Because
  • Title: [Scotch Reform Elucidations to Table]
    Description: Scotch Reform

    Elucidations to Table concluded

    (d) (argued 7: not argued 543) Per[?] 27 th Report of the H. of Commons Finance Committee A o 1798, pp. 27 & 191, the annual profit made by the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas upon Writs of Error of both descriptions, viz. argued and not argued, ie. bona fide & mala fide, put together was -

    ,733. 3.11

    Deduct profit on the 7 bonâ fide ones - 9.8-

    Remains [...?] the 543 malâ fide ones - ,723.15.11

    "The Lord Chief Justice" (viz. of the Common Pleas) "is Clerk of Error" (it is there said p.191) "of the court of Common Pleas: & Stephen Hough is the Clerk to execute the Office for him."

    The errors in question, are errors alleged to have been committed by the Judicatory of which the Judge in question is the Chief and managing Judge, on the occasion of judgments pronounced in that same judicatory: & it is by means of these 560 judgments, the errors of which, if any, are (except in the almost unexampled case of difference of opinion) of his own making, that this same Judge, in the capacity of Clerk of the Errors under himself, puts into his own pockets [...?] this ,733.

    In 543 out of these 550 instances, the imputation of error can scarcely have been otherwise than groundless: it may have been so in any of the remaining seven: but if these were any in which it was just, in so many must he, in his two capacities together, have been deriving a profit from his own wrong.

    In the case of the Court of Session, had any documentation been made public, [...?] it had appeared, that in the course of three years, 550 Decrees of that Court had been complained of as erroneous, the imputation (it seems probable) wold not have [...?] altogether easily upon the Judges of that Court, & in particular upon the President. But, if it be in the power of any such imputation to excite commotions in learned minds, we see the virtue of ,733 a year in the character of a sedative: & if such be its effect on an English constitution, its effect on a Scotch constitution should not naturally be expected to manifest any very considerable difference.
  • Title: [[094-159v] 21 Jan y 1808 L]
    Description: [094-159v]

    21 Jan y 1808

    L d Eldons Bill

    3. To another set of Commissioners is attributed /committed/ the doings of enquiring into and reporting upon the expediency, and eventually the mode, of engrafting Jury Trial onto the Scottish system of procedure in civil: Then I call the Great Seat Commissioners.

    The part which stands first is that which occupies itself in the establishment of regulations outright: regulations to take effect immediately by authority of Parliament.

    But observing that the effect of it is liable to be modified, and the design in an word[?] counteracted, by the regulations which the Court of Session are [...?] to make, I shall take the liberty of so far changing the order of the matters as to take first into consideration the part which occupies itself in buying[?] a foundation as above for regulations to be framed in future.

    The whole number of Judges, at present 15 to be divided into two sections eight in one, seven in the other: in the eight-seated section the Lord President of the whole Court to preside; in the seven-seated, the Lord Justice Clerk: each section to contain an equal number of the Judges of the Court of Justitiary, reckoning the Lord Justice Clerk as two. This forms the principal matter of the [...?] first section of the Bill. Section 6 th gives to each of those two sections, except as excepted the powers, duties and functions of the whole: section 7 th undertakes to appoint for each section a quorum number, two finding the task not quite so easy perhaps as at first [...?],