date

1 June 1807 Letter V III. Proper
1 June 1807

Letter V

III. Proper Remedies

1. Solvent

In practice ordinary profit by delay, as above described, presents no difficulty: extraordinary may sometimes be difficult to search out and discover. But in each instance unless it be pursued and enquired out, the object of the knave, with Judge and C o his accomplices compassed - factitious delay (the system allowing of it) is produced - the engagements taken by the main body of the law in this behalf disfulfilled and violated - the ends of justice disfulfilled - the aim of the legislator - if he be honest and not in confederacy with Judge and C o, frustrated.

These same distinctions which thus we have seen applying to money or money's worth considered as coming in in the shape of profit, may be seen applying, and with equal truth and propriety to money or money's worth considered as going out, in that shape of loss.

And with a view to prevention of loss, in the shape of damage, with or without injury, on the one side these same distinctions are not more intitled to the legislator's regard than they are with a view to the adjustment of satisfaction for loss, to be made to the sufferer, at the charge of him who, with or without injury, is considered as the author, or on any other score held bound to the reparation of it.

{What renders the propriety, of applying these several distinctions in question to this side as well as to the opposite side, the more prominent and unquestionable, is - that where the malâ fides is not, as most usually it is, on the defendant's side, but on the plaintiff's - and the object of his wish his intention not to acquire gain to himself, but merely to impose loss on his adversary, the actuating motive being not rapacity, but enmity, profit and loss will then be in a manner confounded: the loss to the oppressed constituting the profit, and the whole of the profit, to the oppressor, and consequently running on throughout in exact proportion to it.
Similar Items
  • Title: [/24[?] Dec r 1806/ 1 June 1807 Scotch]
    Description: /24[?] Dec r 1806/ 1 June 1807

    Scotch Reform To L d Grenville

    Letter V

    II. Proper Remedies

    1. By satisfaction beheld as flowing in the shape of gain into the purse of the party injured, and thence in the shape of loss, issuing out of the purse of the author of the injury - by satisfaction, as thus described, of the quantity of matter held out in that shape were to a certain degree ample, making up in quantity for whatsoever it might be seen to want in certainty and propinquity to be deficient on the score of uncertainty and remoteness, it might happen to the knave, if he were of the solvent species to be deterred. No injury, no demand on the score of satisfaction for injury: no demand, no litigation: no litigation, no fees.

    Hence one general line of policy on the part of Judge and C o in the spinning out of jurisprudential law, to keep down the quantity of satisfaction as for injury - to take care that in each instance it shall rather be deficient than, in the way above described, and with relation to their ends - the ends of judicature - excessive.

    On the side of deficiency, the danger to their purpose is less considerable. Without litigation, the injured party by the supposition will not get any thing, on the score of satisfaction or on any other score. Of him therefore Judge and C o are sure, so long as in his view whatsoever may be the truth of the case - less by expence of suit and vexation be not so heavy as to outweigh profit by satisfaction, vindictive as well as pecuniary included.
  • Title: [1822 March 28 Rid Yourselves]
    Description: 1822 March 28

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett 3

    Ultramaria Submissive

    Conclusion

    To conclude. In the way of money or money's worth whichever whether

    for themselves or for you or for themselves Your rulers great will be either /must be

    either/ without force, upon them or by and with and by force. If without force upon

    them, it will be in the way of free trade, they not subject to the dominion of your

    rulers, but ruling themselves and one another as they can agree. This is what in my

    view of the matter will be most conducive to the greatest happiness of all parties.

    If it be with and by force, then will the force be either reciprocal or only on one

    side: reciprocal namely by their being compelled to send money or money's worth to

    your Peninsula, and at the same time you compelled to send money or money's worth to

    Ultramaria. But in this case if there be any gain to your Rulers or to you, it can

    only be to the amount of the difference: nor will that be net profit, but only

    nominal profit (...?) up and overbalanced by net loss. For against this nominal

    profit will be to be set in the first place the cost of freight to and fro, in the

    next place on both sides the cost of keeping up the force. If upon the whole there be

    even the smallest chance of net profit to you from all this which is more than I can

    conceive he who calls upon you to make so boundless an expenditure for the chance of

    it, on him it lies /is encumbent/ to make his estimate, and give expression to it in

    figures.
  • Title: [22 June 1807 (6) Letter V]
    Description: 22 June 1807

    (6)

    Letter V

    II. Litigation

    II. Def t malâ fide

    The bonâ fides of the defendant standing clear of suspicion, and the question, how far this or that article of profit made by him may have owed its existence to the money or money's worth wrongfully retained by him, being exposed to doubt, a case will now and then present itself in which it may be proper, consideration had of pecuniary circumstances on both sides, for the Judge to forbear exacting from the defendant the utmost possible amount of the consequential benefit of which the delay that has taken place is suspected or even ascertained to have been the cause.

    But setting aside the latitude thus proper to be left to the discretion of the Judge, unless in the character of a general rule the force of the maxim be maintained, that no man shall profit by his own delay, just so often as it is departed from, just so often is a bounty given, given by the Judge, to injustice in this shape.

    To search out extra profit under its various modifications, non-commercial and commercial, ordinary and extraordinary, direct and consequential as above marked out - to drag it to light, and strip it of the various disguises under which it will so naturally seek to cloak itself, is a process that in some instances will be found to involve more or less of difficulty: but to the investigation of latent profit or loss no greater difficulties oppose themselves than what frequently oppose themselves (as per Letter 4 th) to the investigation of latent evidence: and cases will arise in which in both of these lines investigation is alike necessary to justice.

    By a chain of whatsoever length drawn up, and by whatsoever disguises masked, will profit, even in value, abate any thing of its influence in the hand or in the heart?