1
results found in
849 ms
Page 1
of 1
[094-283v]
25 Dec r 1806
Scotch Reform
To L d Grenville
Revelation the 60 th. That when any judgment shall have been pronounced in any Chamber of the Court of Session, it shall be subject to review in a Chamber of Review, in which none of the Judges shall sit who belonged to that Chamber whose judgment is to be reviewed; and that the cause shall, in that stage, be conducted by printed cases, and hearing of Counsel, in the manner and form observed in Appeal to the House of Lords; such Chamber of Review to constituted in such manner hereafter be appointed by act of Parliament.
Here is delay, vexation, expence, with no proportion of professional profit, organized /manufactured/ without disguise. If the interests of the /people[?] in quality[?] of //the character/ suitors, if the interests of question[?] are to derive any benefit from it, I should be glad to know in what shape.
Permitt me on this occasion once more, my Lord, to beg Your Lordship's attention to a distinction /division of causes/ which though not to be found in the Law Books, is not the less /but the more //has not the less claim/ avertions of the attention of a /the/ legislator - the distinction between bonâ fide and malâ fide causes. To the latter class belongs every cause in which either party is in malâ fide /that commonness of wrong exists on either side malâ fides/, and for obvious reasons, the party by [...?] the most apt to be in that case in the Defendant.
Similar Items
-
Title: [Dec r 1806 6 + Scotch Reform To L]Description: Dec r 1806 6 + Scotch Reform To L d Grenville Resolut. 10 "Resolution the 10 th. That when a Party in any Court the decrees of which are subject to be reviewed by the Court of Session, shall be disatisfied with any judgement of such Court, he shall be at liberty, instead of proceeding by the present mode of advocation or suspension, to enter an appeal to the Court of Session after the mode and form by which decrees of inferior Courts are brought under the review of the Lords of Justiciary on the Circuit, with the exception of such cases as, for the sake of the dispatch of justice or otherwise, it may be found necessary to except, and for which cases particular regulations may hereafter be provided."
-
Title: [25 Dec r 1807 Letter V Repeal]Description: 25 Dec r 1807 Letter V Repeal[?] II Review Chamber Seeing so much said about malâ fide causes, Your Lordship may perhaps be not incurious to know, /deem it not altogether undeserving of notice/, what may reasonably be expected to be their proportion to bonâ fide causes. My Lord, without the end /need/ of /any expence of/ any thing like /sagacity or/ arithmetical skill or sagacity on my part, it is in my power to give to that question an answer which, I hope, will be found satisfactory /tolerably precise/ /sufficiently precise/: all from the prototype of the Chamber of Review, as depicted /determined/ by the Committee on Finance Total Number of causes in a year lodged in the Exchequer Chamber in an average of three[?] years - minute fractions and uncertainties neglected - 606 Whereof argued, with or without any supposition of merits, or expectation of succeeding against the merits, and therefore not proved to be mala fide causes on the part of the defendant 6 Remains unargued, argument not presenting to the eyes of the defendant or his professional advisers, any the faintest sliver[?] of success, and therefore all of them to a certainty on that same side malâ fide causes - - - 600 In the mind of the learned placemen[?] of the Scotch Chamber of review was there any appearance or prospect of seeing the proportion of certainly mala fide to possibly bonâ fide causes, as compared with the English proportions, lessened? - My Lord, from the first dawn of the age /days/ of reformation in Scotland English practice has been throughout, from the days of L d [...?] in 1789, till now in 1807, English practice, such practice as Your Lordship has just been seeing, has been the ne plus ultrà of perfection, in the imagination of the Scottish reforming lawyer.
-
Title: [[168-189v] 25 Dec r 1806 Scotch]Description: [168-189v] 25 Dec r 1806 Scotch Reform To L d Grenville To Refd.[?] ev Letter V Review Chamber In the encouragement provided by /held out to/ the technical system for the malâ fide defendant, two branches may again be distinguished: the one consists in the chance of ultimate success, whether by deposition of evidence, or by disabling or delivering the plaintiff from persisting /persevering/ in his demand: the other consists in the advantage /benefit/ of staving off the time for delivering up the matter in dispute. The former of these encouragements is quo[?] abito[?] to the plaintiff's and the defendant's side /both sides of the cause/: the latter is peculiar to the defendant's side. The former is matter of contingency; the latter is certain and indefensible. In the great majority of causes that here come before your Lordships /the House of Lords/, the matter in dispute is wholly or in part pecuniary, property in whatever shape, included. In this case the nature of the certain part of the benefit of delay is presented to view in the clearest terms, /at once in the clearest light,/ by the [...?]-interest of money. In this case the value of the contingent part of the benefit receives the small income from the certain /assured/ /secure/ part: plaintiff in the right, defendant in the wrong, and knowing himself to be so, fights him off with his own money.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1