date

[094-316v] 16 Jan y 1803 Expiries
[094-316v]

16 Jan y 1803

Expiries

In relation to [...?] there circumstanced, thus much is /two things are/ already , I trust, partly apparent. One is that in point of law (expediency always out of question) neither the Governor nor any body he had any right to detain any one of them a moment after the expiration of his term. 2. Another is, that after that same point of time - neither /as little/ had he any right of applying any sort of special controul to their conduct, even supposing the existence of a general right of controul over the inhabitants of the Colony taken without distraction.

So much as to the right. In point of fact, what appears is - that on the contrary. 1. [...?] were taken for preventing /detaining/ persons of this description from ever quitting the Colony without have[?]: which here was [...?] given sanctions [...?] - sometimes collectively to the class in general, sometimes to particular individuals of that class, and without any freed principle of distinction that can be perceived.

2. After expiration of their respective terms, they were moreover and [...?] being thus confused to this source[?] of punishment, treated as [...?] in divers instances, being collectively of individually kept in a state of bandage /servitude/.

As to delegation, the ground /topic/ of necessity, considered as a /in the character of/ justification or ever so much as one excuse, facts altogether. Expediency, mere expediency is all /the utmost/ that can be alledged under this head: and were this an expediency [...?] purely to the interests of the community in the Mother Country, not the interests of the colony /community/ thus governed. In the case of Convicts transported to America under the original transportation laws [...?][...?].

Supposing on the other hand the right of detention wanting on the other hand the power of detention assumed and exercised on these suppositions not only merely every instance where permission to quit the [...?] was refused, but also every instance in which it was granted are material for consideration. Every such refusal is an illegal exercise of this power in question: every such permission is a fresh evidence of the assumption of it: exception protect[?] regulation: in /by/ the very act of permission, the permission being official, a pernicious refusal, and that an immoral[?] one is [...?...?].
Similar Items
  • Title: [10 May 1805[?] Evidence Introd.]
    Description: 10 May 1805[?]

    Evidence Introd.

    Introd

    Ch.5. Collateral Incidental

    '. Delay

    I. Exertions of illegal power, for the purpose of forcibly detaining Convicts within the Colony, or reconveying them into it, after the expiration of their terms.

    II. Exertions of illegal power, placing Convicts in a state of bondage within the Colony after the expiration of their terms.

    1. Liberty of departure, and freedom from bondage, both refused to a number of Convicts /expires/ at the same time, on the ground that no evidence of the terms they had had originally to serve /original commencement and length of their terms/ was to be found.

    2. Punishment inflicted on an expired Expence for attempting to quit[?] the Colony

    3. Married men though [...?] forbidden to leave the Colony otherwise than in case[?] of their finding security for the maintenance of their wives and families.

    4. Expiries[?] still kept in bondage. Faculty of choosing the place of labour - an indulgence.

    5. Measures taken for causing[?] expiries[?] who had repaired to [...?] to /[...?] found means to get to/ be forcibly sent back to New South Wales

    6. General liberty of departure announced at at time when [...?] for preventing it were [...?] from the things [...?] as [...?]

    7. Intention of a general detention of expiries[?] in general notwithstanding a declaration made at the very time announcing a liberty of departure to expiries[?] in general.

    Under the heads of vexation and expence, mention has been made of the ulterior evils of which those evils, of themselves sufficiently great, are so apt to be productive. Delay is prolific of vexation. delay is prolific of expence. By[?] a double title, though in a [...?] degree delay is therefore prolific of those same evils.
  • Title: [27 Jan y 1803 (2 At this rate it On]
    Description: 27 Jan y 1803 (2

    At this rate it On this construction it may be objected you would

    declare illegal any every act of imprisonment

    up

    Upon the whole, this much I think will appear sufficiently established:

    — that setting aside exceptions, the special

    affirmations

    as well not only every act of "imprisonment"

    but also as every act of detention in prison

    exercised by the procurement of persons in authority

    here in England

    in any spot out of England

    on on the person of a subject of the realm of England

    "being an inhabitant or " of the said realm it, under the words

    of the act "illegal" [ and as such comes

    subject

    under the penalties the offending parties to the penalties

    provided by this clause:] and that in the case in question the

    effect of the several transportation laws is indeed to legalize the

    imprisonment in its commencement — to legalize the act of sending

    into imprisonment — to legalize the continuance of it during

    each respective term — to legalize the detention down to

    the end of each such term — but not to legalize it after the

    expiration of any such term: and lastly that so far as the net is

    illegal, so far are the offending parties

    subject to the penalties provided by the Statute.
  • Title: [[094-315v] 16 Jan y 1803 Expiries]
    Description: [094-315v]

    16 Jan y 1803

    Expiries

    laws not a thought was ever entertained of employing this [...?] as a ground for ever delivering or excluding a single Convict beyond his legal transportation. In the case of this new Colony, under this new transportation system of the lea of expediency has any application, beyond what it had under the prior system, it can not be on any other ground than that of the incompetency of this modern /new-[...?]/ system in comparison of the old one. Under the old one /system/, they are reformed: therefore it was no such sufficient reason had of preventing them from coming back. Under the new system they are worse corrupted than before: thence comes the sufficiency of the reason supposing it [...?] for preventing them from coming back from New South Wales.

    /The new system must firs be supposed to be a bad one[?] an inexpedient[?] one in their point of view bad at least in comparison of the old one, for the purpose of proving the expediency of the stretch[?] of power[?] //act of coercion// in question an act of coercion which under the old system were without example./

    As to bondage, the keeping them in that state, it being determined that they should be detained there, rested on other grounds and on the ground of expediency, more or less sufficient at any rate more plausible. Some sort of co-ersion - beyond what they would have been /[...?] in general are/ subjected to in England after the [...?] of their terms /Why not subject such persons in England to whatever coercion was deemed[?] employ there?/, could scarcely be deemed to be necessary - necessary to the [...?] and perhaps the very existence of the Colony. From that up to absolute bondage, may exist different degrees of coercion, differing in [...?] instances by shades of difference not easily definable: but admitting that in the instance of any such degree that it was beyond what was necessary [...?] reference to those objects those ends even[?] the plea of trial necessity[?], and the plea even of expediency along with it.

    These considerations however it ought [...?] to [...?...?] are rather of a moral nature, and as such not truly[?] [...?] to the object of the personal essay: in a purely legal point of view, all such distinctions are [...?...?] purpose. In each case, the advantage the [...?] the conclusion in point of expediency is - that the Colony so circumstanced ought not either to have been established as [...?]: /authorities at home[?]/ not that the conduct[?] thus rendered necessary by them ought no to have been maintained by the authorities in the Colony. The satisfaction[?] - the excuse - whether it may immoral be applies totally to persons there: not in any degree to presume here. Whether[?] here[?] no[?] [...?] ought a man to be [...?...?] advantage of the [...?].