date

[094-373v] 4 April 1808 Letter
[094-373v]

4 April 1808

Letter V

Ch. 3

By this fixation a sort of compromise was made, and the two opposite interests, those of the Judges, and those of the lieges - [...?] and God - for sale[?] in the religion of the Court of Session is the ends of precedence, served at the same time. Among the ends of judicature, if indeed there were ever any others, judicial repose, occupied in the order of precedence as settled by the Lord President and the art of his fourteen Colleagues, at any rate the first [...?]. According to the composition of the Right Honourable and learned Lord /Memorial art. 50/ division of the Inner House into two judicatories would by necessary consequence have governed the quantity of this greatest of public benefits /judicial blessings/. For though in England, viz. in Westminster Hall, where judicial convenience is not altogether disregarded, three judicatories having cognizance of the same courses, do continue to sit all along[?] on the same days, yet at Edinburgh, there was a something /in the [...?] perhaps/, that rendered such simultaneousity[?] impossible. Memorial arts 4 "At the Chambers are only to sit, and indeed can only sit alternately. If at the Scottish Bar which is said not to afford more than about ,3,000 a year for its busiest and most illustrious members, there were any whose quantity of business would be subjected to reduction, by the division of the Inner House into two, and the law of nature which forbids two bodies to exist a at the same time in the same place, the impossibility of such simultaneosity would naturally in that other set of illustrious eyes present itself in a equally strong light. Happily for the lieges, making the whole learned Faculty together, the [...?] of the greater number of its members are not so compleatly filled with business that the division in question would have the effect of causing any considerable part of that business to overflow and escape. Accordingly what in the eyes of the great majority of the judges was physically impossible, was in the eyes of the still greater majority of the Faculty of Advocates indispensably necessary. /Resolution 2?/
Similar Items
  • Title: [8 Feb y 1808 IV days of Sitting]
    Description: 8 Feb y 1808

    IV days of Sitting

    What is seen by seven out of the 15 Judges to be thus impossible, is by the Faculty of Advocates seen to be not only possible, but proper:- a thing which "ought" to be done.

    Modes of vision thus different - and within the same walls, call for explanation and admitt of it.

    Over and above the interest of learned Judges the interest of repose - there is another interest concerned in the business - the interest of the most current and fully employed individuals in the codes of Advocates - the joint interest of the overgrown utility and opulence /the love of favour[?] and opulence/. All the harmony of an illustrious[?] a lock[?] will not enable a man to exist in two places at the same time. Divide the two judicatories into two, you rob each one of these luminaries of half his business.

    In these monopolizers[?] of farm and failure the learned and honourable [...?] of repose behold /on this occasion/ their natural [...?]. Ask any of /Demand of/ them whether it be possible for two judicatories to sit /be sitting/ within the same walls at the same time. Their answer, already given by the [...?] of Your Lordships learned reformer - they answer - it is almost superfluous to say, will /would/ is in the negative.
  • Title: [25 Oct r 1807 L d Eldon's Bill]
    Description: 25 Oct r 1807

    L d Eldon's Bill

    '.8.

    Senior Judges

    Another incident, nor that altogether an improbable one. In this unfortunate division, which has no Judge either to preside in it, or to sit at the head of it, some how or other by agreement among the Judges, whether by a regular election as under '.2. or by acknowledgement of the Jure divino right of succession claimed by the next in seniority go on with the business of their office. But now in its turn the seeds of dissention spread themselves through the diminished /reduced/ population of this Division (i.e. Court) and a division /takes place/ with equal numbers on both sides takes place. What now is to be done? To terminate the division the same process that was carried on /took place/ before requires to be repeated, though in the contrary direction. A cross-call requires now to be made. Shall it be obeyed or not /be obeyed/? If obeyed to whom shall it be made and by whom shall it be obeyed? Shall this diminished Division take back its own Judge again, or receive one of the Judges that belong to the other? Dire must be the distress, endless the doubts and difficulties: and while the unhappy divisions between which an interminable division has thus been excited /stirred up/ are distracting /tormenting/ themselves to find or rather make a sense for an Act which has none of its own, the business of justice is at a stand: and the great misfortune is that unless for clearing up all these difficulties of which the two Inner Houses are the scene /theatre/ the learned Judges can find a decent reason /ground/ for ordering pleadings scriptural or oral by Advocates of the parties, at the expence of the parties, notwithstanding the vast [...?] thus given to the business, nobody is the better for it.
  • Title: [8 Feb y 1808 Powers Se Why]
    Description: 8 Feb y 1808

    Powers Se

    Why not say - as the sun can only shine half the day - and thence[?] forth[?] go on to draw whatsoever conclusion presents itself as most convenient and agreable? Why not say - as the sun can only shine half the day, therefore let us[?] be [...?] the other half?

    Why not say the sun can only shine half the day? what opposition /[...?]/ would the proposition have [...?] with the learned scribe of the Lord Eldon? Not a day in [...?] time but be [...?] therefore[?] Judges studied[?] into four judicatories, all sitting at the same time. And with the spectacle before him, the [...?...?] whether to sit at the same time or not at the same time, he refers the option /decision/ to the Oracle which has already declared /pronounced/ that for two sets of Judges to sit at the same time is impossible.