date

22 Sept 1814 '. 1 Logic Ch
22 Sept 1814 '. 1

Logic

Ch 2 Characteristics

'.1. Lists Aristotle and JB's

1

1

- Sanderson's Precognita forms [?] Chap.1.

3. Officias. ([...?] 1.[...?] 2.[...?] 3.[...?]) 5. Subjectiva. viz. (1. [...?] [...?]. 2. Oratio. 3. [...?] - [GREEK] (5. Secunda intentio. 6. Syllogismus vel [...?] specialiter [...?].) 6. Partes tres: viz. [...?]: 1. [...?] [...?]. 2. [...?] 4. [...?] 3. [...?]: quæ vel ite Argumentatio et Methodo.

Ch.2

Logic - its Characteristics - viz. 1. its End. 2. Field of Exercise. 3 Subjects 4. Operations 5. Faculties. 6. Instruments. 7. Functions. 8. Uses.

'.1. Lists of these Characteristics - 1. Aristotle's. 2. the Author's.

In the character of an appendage /As appendages/ to that /After a definition of the word logic, in the/ definition the Aristotelians have brought to view terms a cluster of abstract terms which had presented themselves as in some way or other appertaining to it, and as promising to contribute to the explanation of the nature of the art {designated by it the end which that term was employed by them to designate} /defined by it/.

Precognita de naturâ Logicæ is the title given prefixed to the Chapter {being Chapter the first} in which, in the Compendium of Sanderson, the definition of Logic, with these explanations subjoined to it is contained.

Though, taken in detail, these explanations have been found /the mode of execution has appeared/ as will be seen, susceptible of considerable amendments, the design seemed /has been regarded as/ highly useful; and of the [...?] /sketch/ therin contained that which here follows, though not a copy, may /will/ be seen to be an imitation, or at any rate a sketch executed on a plan, of which the general idea and some of the principal lines were borrowed /taken/ /drawn/ /derived/ from that source.

24
Similar Items
  • Title: [22 Sept. 1814 Logic Ch.2. Characteristics]
    Description: 22 Sept. 1814

    Logic

    Ch.2. Characteristics

    '.1. List Aristotle's and J.B.'s.

    2

    2

    1. Uses - ( Utilitates). 2. End in view. ( Finis). 3. Functions ( Officia) 4. Object (Objectum). 5. Subjects ( Subjectum as exhibited in six modifications) Parts (Partes, which, three in number; are brought to view Such is the list of the characteristics of logic, as exhibited by Sanderson and other Compendialists; exhibited, though not under that or any other common name /appellative/ unless the word præcognita (things foreknown) be taken for an /that/ appellative.

    I/ General {End to the attainment of which} /End in view to which/ the art called Logic is directed /keeps or ought to keep in view/. {II. Field, in /on/ which its exercises are performed.} /II. Field of exercise appertaining to this art./ III. Operations, to which it is capable of giving direction and assistance. IV. Faculties to which it gives direction and assistance. V. Instrument viz. Language, employed in giving direction and assistance to these same Faculties in the performance of these same Operations. VI. Uses, to which it is applicable. VII. Functions, to the exercise of which in relation to other arts and sciences it gives /is capable of giving/ direction and assistance -- Such is the list of the articles, which, under that same name of the characteristics of the art, will, by means of the explanations respectively given of them /in relation to them, be under these same appellations /denominations//, be employed in the explanation of it.

    25
  • Title: [25 July 1814 '.3 + Logic Ch]
    Description: 25 July 1814 '.3 +

    Logic

    Ch.2. Characteristics

    '.3. the Field

    6

    1

    '.3.II. Field of exercise appertaining to this art.

    The definition of this art being given, as above, the field of its exercise has been already given. Within it is contained the field of every other art - the field of every science - the field in a word of every occupation, such alone excepted, if any such there be, to the exercise of which in the most advantageous manner, no exertion of mental power is either necessary or in any way conducive.

    29
  • Title: [1822 Oct. 18 Jug Util and Jug True]
    Description: 1822 Oct. 18

    Jug Util and Jug True Lists of Jesus’s Apostles in the order & manner in which they stand in the Evangelists

    Matthew. Ch. X

    Verse 2

    1. Simon who is called Peter

    2. Andrew his brother in all three lists

    3. James the Son of Zebedee in all three lists

    4. John, his Brother in all three lists

    5. Philip in all three lists

    6. Bartholomew in all three lists

    7. Thomas in all three lists

    8. Matthew the Publican in all three lists

    9. James the son of Alpheus in all three lists

    10. Lobbeus, whose surname was Thaddeus. in two lists: this and Mark’s

    11. Simon the Canaanite. in all three lists: if he be the Canaanite.

    12. Judas Iscariot who also betrayed him. in all three lists.

    Mark. Ch. III.

    Verse 16. Simon he surnamed Peter. in all three lists

    2 James, the Son of Zebedee in all three lists

    3. John the Brother of James in all three lists

    4. Andrew in all three lists

    5. Philip. in all three lists

    6. Bartholomew. in all three lists

    7. Matthew. in all three lists

    8. Thomas. in all three lists

    9. James the Son of Alpheus. in all three lists

    10. Thaddeus. in two lists this and Matthew.

    11. Simon the Canaanite

    12. Judas Iscariot. which also betrayed him.

    Luke. Ch. VI.

    Verse 14. 1 Simon, who he also named Peter. in all three lists

    2. Andrew his Brother in all three lists

    3. James. in all three lists

    4. John in all three lists

    5. Philip in all three lists

    6. Bartholomew in all three lists

    7. Matthew in all three lists

    8. Thomas. in all three lists

    9. James the Son of Alpheus. in all three lists.

    10. Simon called Zelotes. in all three lists if Zelotes was the Canaanite

    11. Judas, the Brother of James only in this one list. Quere which of the two James’s?

    12. Judas Iscariot which also was the traitor.

    In Matthews and Marks lists is Thaddeus, who is wanting in Luke.

    In Lukes list is Judas the Brother of James, who is wanting in Matthew’s and Mark’s.

    This list is taken from the three general lists in those three Evangelists But before this is given a particular account of the manner in which certain of them were called.

    The first named is in all of them a man ‘sitting at the receipt of custom’. But in Matthew (IX 2) he is named Matthew; in Mark, Levi the son of Alpheus; in Luke, Levi without saying whose son. In all three is seen a James by the name of the son of Alpheus: in Luke alone there is a Judas who is named the brother of James: and James the son of Alpheus is in place the nearest to this Judas. In Mark the same publican who is named Levi in his 2 d Chapter verses from 14 to 22 is named Matthew in his 3 d verse 18. In Luke the same man who is named Levi in his 5 th Chapter verses 27 to 39 is named Matthew in his 6 th verse 15.

    Between the two inconsistent statements the interval is no greater than in Mark is occupied by 22 of the short sentences called verses; in Luke no greater than is occupied by 21 of them.