date

25 Sept. 1814 Logic Ch. │
25 Sept. 1814

Logic

Ch. │ │ Aristotle's Præcognita

'.5 End - Finis End

8

2

'.4{II and III Uses and} End of Logic, according to the Aristotelians.

Knowledge of things - viz. either scientific knowledge alone, or this with the addition of unscientific - knowledge of things cognitio rerum, beyond this even, the pretensions of the Aristotelians - at any rate any distinct and explicit pretension, did not extend.

Far indeed however were their actual attainments - far even their actual researches, from coming up to these pretensions.

{The knowledge of} words - viz. the import of words, this was the utmost point - within this field was contained the sum total of their researches.

A certain sort of coincidence. To exhibit a demonstration, so they termed it - was with them the great work - the object and if attained the fruit of all their ingenuity and of all their labours.

This demonstration when it exhibited, what did it amount

to? an indication of a certain mode and degree of coincidence between the import of the two words? this and nothing more.

But this exploit, what did it require? It required that to all the several words employed the same import be annexed by the disputing parties. Suppose this identity to have place, then if the demonstration was correct, the opponent could not deny it without falling into a contradiction in terms. But this necessary condition suppose it in any part wanting: in this case no demonstration could take place: not so much as this faint semblance of, and spurious substitute for real knowledge.

Observation - experience, experiment, experience: these were the only processes by which real knowledge could be attained: and by the boasted art of logical demonstration, to what extent so ever employed, not a particle of knowledge was obtained through all or any one of these sources.[?]

81
Similar Items
  • Title: [31 July 1814 + '.5 Logic Ch]
    Description: 31 July 1814 + '.5

    Logic

    Ch. │ │ Aristotle's Præcognita

    '.5.II. End. Finis.

    7

    1

    '.5.'II. End of Logic - Finis - according to the Aristotelians.

    After the topic of the uses of Logic - the utilitatis,[?] and not before, comes in that list the topic of finis, finis ejus,[?] scilicet Logicæ, i.e. the general end. But of logic as of any thing else what are the uses but so many modifications of the general - the universal end, or so many means tending to the attainment of it? If so, first should have come the end, after that the uses: first the genus, then and not till then the species.

    This end of Logic - this end when it does comes - what is

    it? Is it the universal the sole universal end - actually as well as fitly and properly the universal end - well-being, i.e. the maximum of pleasures alloyed by the minimum of pains? Not it indeed: no such amplitude does it extend to. It is confined in the first place to mere knowledge. But except in so far as in some shape or other it leads to and is productive of well-being - a balance on the side of happiness - what is all the value of all the knowledge in the world worth? - Just nothing.

    In the next place though the whole of knowledge it might be, and still be worth nothing, it is not so much as the whole of knowledge. Persons and things - under one or other of these heads may be comprized the subjects of knowledge: of the two persons, a man would be apt [to] think the most interesting: but to persons - to what belongs to persons - it does not so much as profess to extend: it confines itself and most pointedly to things - Finis vero unicus, Cognitio sciliect rerum.[?]

    80
  • Title: [25 Sept 1814 Logic Ch. │ │]
    Description: 25 Sept 1814

    Logic

    Ch. │ │ Aristotle's Præcognita

    '.5.II End. Finis. End

    9

    3

    Of this assuming science thus worthless was the end.

    In truth it was not simply worthless - it was positively pernicious. It was pernicious by drawing aside and keeping mankind for so many ages out of the only really instructive track of study as abovementioned and in this uninstructive one.

    But out of an ill-directed pursuit it will sometimes happen that useful results may collaterally - and as it were by a side wind be, brought to light.

    Though of all the propositions thus demonstrated or demonstrable the value was is and ever will be equal to 0 - though logical demonstration, the fruit of all this labour, was and is mere delusion, yet of the operations which had no other object than the formation and maturation of this fruit, many there are which have been and will ever continue to be found, applicable to and continually applied to real and most important uses.

    The demonstration of the Aristotelian may in this respect be compared to the philosophers stone of the Heraclitic philosophers. The stone was a non-entity: but in digging for this non-entity, real entities pregnant with real and important uses were discovered in no inconsiderable numbers.

    * Substances applicable to the purposes of medicine dying,

    82
  • Title: [16 Oct 1814 C.5 '.2 + Logic]
    Description: 16 Oct 1814 C.5 '.2 +

    Logic

    Ch. │ │ Disputation

    '.1. General Factors

    1

    1

    Real art taught by the disputative branch - the art of causing to be distinguish[ed] that which you agree to from that which you disagree to: distinguishes the one from the other.

    For 17 centuries, the delusion, the imposture reigned triumphant: it requires a Bacon to dethrone it. In Observation &c. behold he said the only true road to knowledge. Thus much he did: vast was the difficulty (in those days) as well as vast the case. Thus much Bacon did: more he did not do. He marked out the road but scarcely did he set his foot on it: and small was the success of the few steps he took in it.

    Ch.

    Of description: disputation, argumentation or debate: viz. of that branch of the Aristotelian logic which tutors that operation for its subject.

    '.1. The disputative branch of Aristotle's logic - in which respects it failed.

    In respect of miscarriage and success, the character and lot of the art of logic as taught by Aristotle may be considered as a sort of prototype of the art of alchemy as taught by the searchers after the universal medicine the universal solvent and the philosopher's stone. In both instances in respect of the ultimate object a compleat failure was the result: but in both instances, in consequence and in the course of the inquiry, particular discoveries of no inconsiderable use and importance were brought to light.

    Of the art of logic, according to the declaration made by the Aristotelians the professed object was, the communication in which was necessarily implied the attainment of knowledge, correct and compleat knowledge, a perfect acquaintance with relation to every thing knowable every thing which by human faculties is capable of being known. Knowledge - not a slight superficial knowledge but correct and compleat, viz. such as it was in the nature of the instrument called demonstration to produce.

    104