29 July 1814

Logic

2

Ch.2 End &c.

3. Operations

21

8

(a) The transitive was the only original use.

+ But as to them consult Locke &c.

So much more conspicuous {however} is the transitive use of discourse or language, that, in comparison with it, the intransitive seems scarcely to have obtained notice. (a) +

In importance however it is second only to the transitive use. By its transitive use the collection of these signs is only the vehicle of thought; by its intransitive use it is an instrument employed in the creation and fixation of thought itself. Unclothed as yet in words, or stripped of them, thoughts are but dreams: like /as/ the shifting clouds of the sky, they float in the mind one moment, and vanish out of it the next. But for these fixed and fixative signs, nothing that ever bore the name of art or science could ever have come into existence. Whatsoever may have been the more remote and recondite causes, it is to the superior amplitude to which, in respect of the use made of it in his own mind, man has been able to extend the mass of his language, that, as much as to anything else, man, it should seem, stands more immediately indebted for whatsoever superiority in the scale of perfection and intelligence he possesses, as compared with those animals who come nearest to him in this scale.

Without language, not only would men have been incapable of communicating each man his thoughts to other men, but, compared with what he actually possesses, the stock of his own ideas would, in point of number, have been as nothing; while each of them, taken by itself, would have been as flitting and indeterminate as {those of the animals which he deals with at his pleasure.}

56
Similar Items
  • Title: [29 July 1814 Logic 1]
    Description: 29 July 1814

    Logic

    1

    Ch. Language

    20

    7

    '.2 Minds to which - modes in which application is made of these signs - {of the signs of which discourse or language is composed.}

    The mind to which on any occasion application is made of these signs, is either the mind of the person /that person alone/ by whom they are employed, or the mind of some other person: in the former /latter/ case, the use made of them may be termed /stiled/ the intransitive /transitive/ use; in the other case, the transitive / intransitive/. (a)

    Thus it is that, howsoever /how/ intimately /soever/ connected, designation /(simple designation)/ and discoursing are different operations: without designation, discoursing {it is true} can /could/ not have taken place; but, without discoursing, designation may, and it frequently does, at present, to a great extent, take place.

    Not that, had it not been for the purpose of discourse, designation, there seems reason to think, would ever have taken place; it is, accordingly, as it should seem to its intransitive use, that discourse or language is indebted for its existence.

    Note (a)

    (a) By some of the grammarians whose works are in present use, verbs stand distinguished into transitive and intransitive

    transitive are those which are most commonly termed active, intransitive those which are commonly termed neuter. An instance of the active or transitive verb is ferio, I strike; an instance of the neuter or intransitive verb is curro, I run. Not but that in the neuter /intransitive/ verb action /agency/ is expressed; but in this case so is passion, or say, to avoid ambiguity, patiency likewise; and so it is that in one and the same person the agent and the patient are comprised: the agent, the volitional part of his mind; the patient or patients, those parts of his bodily frame by which the action or operation called running is performed.

    55
  • Title: [28 July 1814 Logic Ch.2 Ends]
    Description: 28 July 1814

    Logic

    Ch.2 Ends &c.

    20

    7

    In regard to language, two very /perfectly/ distinguishable functions have been brought to view - the intransitive and the transitive.

    In respect of its intransitive function, it, as it were, amalgamates itself with thought - it forms no more than a sort of clothing to thought.

    In respect of its transitive function, it is the medium of communication between one mind and another, or others.

    29
  • Title: [29 July 1814 Logic 3]
    Description: 29 July 1814

    Logic

    3

    Ch.2 End &c.

    3. Operations

    22

    9

    (a) 3 dec 1815 Several more now observed - [...?][...?][...?]

    Of the six /seven or more/ distinguishable mental operations (a) to the performance of each language, now that it is formed, is instrumental and subservient, - viz. l. Perception; 2. Recollection; 3. Attention, &c.; 4. Abstraction, whence imagination and invention; 5. Judication; 6. Designation; and 7. Converse, or communication of ideas; this of communication of ideas is but one. Look back upon these others, and you will see there is scarcely one of them to which, in respect of this its intransitive use, to which, in the character of a spring, as well as a regulator of thoughts, language, {if not indispensably necessary} is not, in an eminent degree, subservient.

    {Of this proposition, the truth will appear in a still stronger and stronger light as the thread of the present discourse advances.}

    57