date

6 Oct. 1814 Logic or Language
6 Oct. 1814

Logic or Language

Ch. Qualities

Rules

1. Terms

2

2

II. Adjectives.

1. Either employed instead of each.

To the word either belongs an exclusive signification, which belongs not to the word each. Where the idea of exclusion is not intended to be conveyed, how slovenly and absurd is it not to employ a word by which the exclusion is expressed ? Yet of negligence in this shape, examples are continually occurring.

Poetry is the species of composition in which it is most frequent. There it has its excuse - 1. In cases where the monosyllable each would not, so it may be that the dissyllable either will suit the measure. 2. In poetry, distinctness is less requisite than in prose. A uniform distinctness would even be incompatible with the nature of the composition, and fatal to the design of it. To produce and keep up in the mind, confusion, so it be but accompanied with pleasure, is an object not of aversion, but of endeavour and study.

To affectation may the sin against propriety be imputed in this case, as well as in the last preceding one.

In saying taste when he means relish a man pleases himself with the thought of showing how familiarly he is acquainted with the language of France.

In saying either when he means each a man pleases himself with the thought of showing how familiarly he is acquainted with the language of poetry.

Affectation the genus, pedantry the species; formerly the dress most frequently worn by pedantry was Greek and Latin; latterly, it is French and poetry.

To the ambiguity attached to this impropriety, one circumstance alone operates in some measure as a palliative. If so it be, that for predicating what you meant to predicate alike of two things, A and B, the word you have employed is a word by which one of them is excluded; conceive the word repeated, then, one after the other, they are both of them comprised. First introduce A without B, then introduce B without A - both of them are introduced; but how much better would it not be if, without any such unintended exclusion, both were introduced at once.

95
Similar Items
  • Title: [22 March 1817 Plan Cat 2 o]
    Description: 22 March 1817

    Plan Cat

    2 o

    Introd

    § 10 Bribery & Terrorism

    2

    2. Bribery how comes it to have been made punishable? To speak more distinctly though

    less familiarly more distinctly, by the forces of what interest have the penal laws

    against the practice been produced.

    Answer 1. One interest is the sort of interest possessed in or more particularly by

    the class of men called Country Gentlemen – the land-bestriding of whom principally

    is composed the class of terrorists. The laws against seduction in its alluring form

    are instruments employed in the hands of that land bestriding class of seductionist

    and other other seductionists whose instrument of seduction or terror the laws

    against seduction in the /its/ alluring form are instruments by which the competition

    of the purse brandishing seductionist is endeavoured to be excluded

    In the language of shallow /superficial/ morality sentimentally[?] Bribery being

    commonly held up to view in the character of an […?] immorality, hence the

    affectation of seeking to exclude it by the force of penal law the republic[?] of a

    regard /claim is laid to the […?] of zeal/ for morality. […?]
  • Title: [6 Oct. 1814 Section 1 '.2 Logic or]
    Description: 6 Oct. 1814 Section 1 '.2

    Logic or Language

    Ch. Qualities

    Rules

    1. Terms

    1

    1

    Rules for the avoidance of ambiguity, obscurity, and debility, so far as depends upon the choice of words taken singly.

    I. When the language affords a word appropriated exclusively to the expression of the import which alone it is your intention to express, avoid employing any word which is alike applicable to the expressing of that import, and a different one which may require to be distinguished from it.

    Substantives - adjectives - adverbs - in the instance of all these parts of speech, frequent breaches of this rule may be found.

    I. Substantives.

    1. The word taste

    employed instead of the word relish. To

    relish a thing is to taste it with pleasure. Do you relish this peach ? In this question there is no ambiguity, not even for a moment. But instead of this, oftentimes defined - Do you taste this peach ? and so in the case of almost any other source of pleasure; for example, a poem, a sonata, a building, a landscape.

    In the French language there exists no appropriate word by which pleasure is represented as an accompaniment of the perception indicated; no word expressive of, I taste with pleasure. Gouter is to taste; and for, to relish, there is again this word and no other. In French, therefore, this imperfection, this ambiguity and inadequacy, this incompleteness, and consequent incorrectness of expression, is the result of necessity. In the word taste, when employed instead of the word relish, this imperfection is needlessly and inelegantly copied. Why ? Answer - from affectation and vain glory, to give the hearer or reader to understand that the speaker or writer is so well acquainted with that foreign language, that it is more readily present to his memory than his own language.

    94
  • Title: [13 Aug. 1813 Logic 2]
    Description: 13 Aug. 1813

    Logic

    2

    Language

    Copiousness & Enrichment

    5

    When the composite mode in which enrichment is performed, is per inequalitatem, the words conjoined being in their import of unequal importance with relation to each other, the one may be considered as the principal, the other as being, with relation to it, the accessory word.

    In this case let the number of words thus related and entering into the composition of the compound word be supposed to be no more than two, the place of the accessory word will either be anterior or posterior to the principal; if anterior, it may be termed, with relation to it, a prefix, if posterior, it has been called in Latin a suffix.

    120