date

24 Aug. 1813 Logic 3
24 Aug. 1813

Logic

3

Ch. Language-Grammar

Conjugation, Grammar

3

When the person by whose agency it is supposed that the event, or state of things in question would be produced, is a person to whom the discourse is addressed, the relation borne to him, in the order of power, by him who speaks, may either be that of a superior, that of an equal, or that of an inferior. It is in that case alone in which the relation borne by him, as above, is that of a superior, nor in that, but when the superiority is so marked /decided/ and acknowledged as to give to the expression of his wish, so denoted, the character and denomination of a command, that the term imperative can with propriety be applied to it.

It is when the person by whose agency it is desired that the event, or state of things in question should be produced is the Almighty, that the imperfection and absurdity of this denomination presents itself in a striking point of view. Grant us, O Lord ! Hear us, O Lord ! Taken in themselves, and without a thought bestowed upon the grammarians by whom a common appellation has been bestowed upon these forms, there is nothing to which any such idea as that of impropriety appears to attach itself. But when to such a form of speech, when to any form of speech, addressed to a person conceived to be in such a situation, any such appellation as that of imperative is applied, then it is that the impropriety - and that rising to a degree of absurdity, involving a virtual contradiction in terms, may be seen to manifest itself beyond dispute.

61
Similar Items
  • Title: [24 Aug. 1813 Logic 2]
    Description: 24 Aug. 1813

    Logic

    2

    Ch. Language-Grammar

    Conjugation, Grammar

    2

    The imperative form is /seems to be/ improperly put upon the same line with and designated by the same name as those other forms which as above are termed moods.

    That which it expresses is, in all cases, the existence of a will an act of volition to a certain effect on the part of the discourse /speaker or writer/.

    For the designation of this will the term imperative considered as applied to all the modifications of which the expression of that will is susceptible, is in a remarkable degree defective; and, by reason of that deficiency, improper, improper in no fewer than three out of four cases.

    Be the case what it may, such will, so expressed, will have for its object either some event, or some state of things. In speaking of this event, or state of things, either some person will be considered in the light of a person by whose will and consequent agency it will or would be made to take place or not; if not, the will expressed is of that sort which is called a wish, and the mood by which expression is given to it has been termed the optative.

    In the other case, the person in consequence by whose agency it is supposed that the event, or state of things in question would be made to take place, is either the person to whom the discourse is addressed, or some other person; in this latter case, likewise, the mood comes under the same denomination, the optative.

    60
  • Title: [25 Aug. 1813 Logic Ch. Language]
    Description: 25 Aug. 1813

    Logic

    Ch. Language Grammar

    Conjugation Grammar

    1

    '. Of the imperative future

    Such as it is, under the restrictions above brought to view, the form of speech brought to view under its trivial name, the imperative mood, may be termed the imperative mood.

    All this while, there exists a form of speech which, though not termed imperative is not only imperative, but more strongly and pointedly and forcibly imperative, than that which alone hath, as yet, been ever termed /styled/ imperative. I speak of that which may be termed the imperative future, a form of speech which requires to be placed in contradistinction to that other, which may be termed the predictive, or simply predictive future.

    This is the form of speech which, in the English language, is in some cases designated by the word shall, as when a man says thou shalt or you shall.

    62
  • Title: [2 Sept. 1813 Logic Language-Grammar]
    Description: 2 Sept. 1813

    Logic Language-Grammar

    1

    Language-Grammar

    Under the particular structure of the English language the future tense, including its modifications as above, admits of an additional modification almost, if not altogether, peculiar to itself.

    In consequence of this modification, it requires to be distinguished into two species, - 1. The simply predictive future; 2. The dominative future.

    The simply predictive future is that which it has in common with other languages in general.

    The dominative future is that which is peculiar, or almost peculiar to it, as above.

    The future may be termed dominative, where the event predicted is spoken of as being the result of the power and will of him who speaks.

    The dominative future may be termed imperative, when the event so predicted is spoken of as being an action about to be performed by a person, or persons, to whom the discourse is addressed.

    In the absolute mode or form, for the giving expression to these two modifications of the future tense, the two words will and shall are employed with their respective conjugates; but, in the performance of this function, they make a mutual exchange of their significations in a manner which, to persons who are not perfectly familiarized to it by incessant use, is to a high degree perplexing.

    44