date

At top of sheet, Bentham has noted: ‘Satyrist
At top of sheet, Bentham has noted: ‘Satyrist 1 June 1810. N o 33 p. 570.

‘1. Broughham’s knowledge of the House – his opinion of it. Like L. James[?] Brookes[?] obliged to assume the appearance of frivolity that he might not frighten his Judges or like the professed wit called fool obliged to put on the Cap & Bells.’

‘Looking at the House of Commons with these views’ (says a writer on the subject of parliamentary reform) ‘my object would be to find out its chief defects, and to attempt the remedy of these, one by one. To propose no system, no great project, nothing which pretended even to the name of a plan, but to introduce in a temperate and conciliating manner .... one or two separate Bills....’ c

c

This was Brougham: the time about June 1810. Reference is made to the Government periodical called the Satyrist, (by Manners), June 1810. N o 33. p. 570. But that wretched performance is now pretty well forgotten.

Quere whether to insert this here, or under Graduality-preacher's fallacy?

In this strain were they proposed to be addressed, these men, A o 1810. by M r Brougham in this same strain were they addressed A o 1819 by Sir James Mackintosh, in moving for a Committee on the penal laws. To give a man any chance of doing any thing with them in this same way they have ever been addressed, and must ever be addressed, till by radical reform (for it can not be by any thing less) the House shall have been purged of a class of men of whom the most compleat inaptitude in respect of every element of appropriate aptitude, is an effectual characteristic. In the scale of appropriate probity, in the scale of appropriate intellectual aptitude, to find their level a man must descend below that of the very dregs of the people. Oh what a portrait is here drawn of them, and by so experienced a hand! How cutting, yet how unquestionably just, the perhaps-unintended perhaps intended satyre! To avoid awakening the real terrors of some, the sham-terrors of others, all consistency all comprehensive acquaintance with the field of action must be abjured. When with idolatry in all shapes shall have become extinct, and the word wise-ancestors no longer an instrument of deception but a bye-word, with what scorn will not ancestors such as these be looked back upon by their posterity!
Similar Items
  • Title: [[C103-526] At top of sheet, Bentham]
    Description: [C103-526]

    At top of sheet, Bentham has noted: 'Fallacy Table a case[?] for [...?] rebuke.'

    PRIVATE

    The want of sufficient time for adequate discussion when carried on orally in a numerous assembly, has to no inconsiderable extent been held out by experience in the character of a real and serious evil.

    In the margin, Bentham has noted at this point: ' See this touched upon in Notes in J.B.s Radical Reform as supposed, those which are not yet published the 4 th Feb y 1821.'

    Bentham's Radical Reform Bill, with Extracts from the Reasons, London, 1819. [As yet can't find this point 'touched upon'.]

    To this evil, the Fallacy Table presents a remedy to an indefinite extent, a powerful, and to the whole of the extent, an altogether unexpensive remedy.

    In the text, Bentham has noted at this point: 'speak afterwards of the […?] belonging to this evil. Of the […?] of the only strict[?] remedy, […?] of the […?] uttered to each speaker.

    'Also of the peculiar nature of the evil, in respect of the indissoluble connection with the great good, the encrease of the mass of appropriate talent in the Assembly.'
  • Title: [[mainly in copyist’s hand] 1819 June]
    Description: [mainly in copyist’s hand]

    1819 June 11

    Parl Reform Bill Reasons

    Universality

    Idiots – Brougham

    2 June 1818

    Archb p of Canterbury

    10 June 1819

    2

    Archbishop of Canterbury. “Such would in his sincere and unbiased opinion, be a most perilous experiment, and he implored their Lordships to consider the consequences before they attempted to run the risk. He found only one experiment like it, and which took place in the reign of James the second, when it was attempted to have a Catholic King, but a protestant house of Lords and a protestant House of Commons. Fortunately, the deluded Monarch, under whose reign it was tried, did not succeed; but let their Lordships see what was the attempt now made. It was nothing else than to have a protestant king, with Catholic Houses of Lords and Commons.” (hear hear.)
  • Title: [[129b-645] 26 Jan[?] 1819[?]]
    Description: [129b-645]

    26 Jan[?] 1819[?]

    19 Feb

    Parl Reform Cat

    Collectanea

    Intro

    {Contents and Ordo

    1. Contempt of Judges & other Lawyers for Parl t. exemplification already noticed

    1. Mass[?] & Co s contempt

    2. Double for contempt

    2

    3. Add here to prove the universality and of participation and the pertinacity

    3[?]. Non-discharge contempt

    3

    Sole remedy. Committee on the state of Justice.

    4

    First object of the Committee, cases in which misconception was impossible

    5

    J.B.s able to indicate several such cases

    5

    * Invitation for others

    6

    Facienda for Committee

    1. To Report[?] to House and House to punish the offending Solicitors if alive. Qu. as to […?] before Judges

    7

    House after hearing Judges to come to Resolutions of Penance and to send them to Lords for […?] […?]}

    Chron. 22 Feb y 1817

    Shoreditch Petition[?] […?] Returned by 89 Peers in England and Wales 218

    By 21 Peers in Scotland 31

    By 36 Peers in Ireland 51

    300

    By 90 Commoners in England and Wales 137

    By 14 Commoners in Scot. 14

    By 19 Do. in Ireland 20

    Nominated by Government 16

    Total returned by Nominat n 487

    Independent of d o

    171

    Total of House of Commons 658

    §.5. Remedy in detail[?]:

    1 Immediate[?] causes of mischief sinister interest

    2 Causes of d o

    1. Undue independence

    2. Undue dependence Pag 1

    Situations to be considered

    1. Electors

    2. Representatives 2

    Remedies: as to

    I. Electors

    1. Comprehensive of all interests – therein

    2 or 1 Virtual universality of suffrage

    3. or 2. Practicable equality of suffrage p.3

    4. or 3. Freedom i.e. genuineness or non-spuriousness of suffrage

    5. or 4 Secresy of suffrage p.10

    II. Representatives Ultimate[?] securities[?]

    1. Dependence as to Constituents i.e. Electors.

    2. Independence as to Corrupter General Intermediate is instrumental to securities

    3. Impermanence of the situation: viz. by annuality of re-election

    4 Exclusion of Placemen

    5. Universal constancy of attendance.

    4

    I Encreasing County Seats

    simple

    1. Pitt the first A o 1770

    Meadly p.2

    2. Wilkes A o 1776 p3

    3. Pitt 2 d A o 1783 p.6

    4. Flood A o 1790 p9.

    5. Grey A o 1797 p12

    6. Brand A o 1810 p.15

    7. Brand A o 1812 p.16

    II. Striking[?] off[?] or District[?] Boroughs proved rotten

    7

    1. Pitt 2 d A o 1783 p6.

    2 Grey A o 1800 p13

    3. Brand A o 1810 p.15

    4. Brand A o 1812 p.16

    III L d o by purchase

    Pitt 2 d A o 1785 p.8

    6

    IV. Giving seats to populous terms

    1. Pitt 2 d A o 1785 p8

    2 Gray A o 1797 p12

    3. Gray A o 1800 p.13

    4. Brand A o 1810 p.15

    V Substituting triennuality

    Whig

    1. Friends of the People A o 1793 p.10

    2. Grey A o 1797. p.12

    3. Brand A o 1810 p.16.

    5

    V. Dividing Counties into Electoral Districts

    1. Grey A o 1797 p.12

    1

    VI Admitting Copyholders

    1 Grey. A o 1797 p.12

    2. Brand. 1810 p.15

    3. Brand A o 1812 p.16

    2

    VII Admitting Leaseholders

    1. Grey A o 1797 p12

    3

    VIII Admitting all Leaseholders to vote for Brougham

    1. Grey A o 1797 p.12

    10

    IX. No man to vote for more than one Member.

    1. Grey A o1797. p.12

    N o of occasions on which propositions were made 15

    Among what N o on which nothing specific was proposed 3

    Remain occasions on which d o was d o 12

    Deduct Radical 2

    Remain moderate 10

    1. Giving extension to the Election Franchise

    1. In the case of County Seats admitting Copyholders

    2. In d o admitting Leaseholders

    3. In the case of now or future? Borough Seats admitting Householders

    II. Giving encrease to the number of non-Venal seats

    4 or 1. County Seats

    5 or 2. County distant Seats

    6. or 3. Popular Borough Seats

    III. Excluding venal seats

    7 or 4 without compensation

    8. or 5. with compensation

    IV. Excluding some of the sold Members

    9. or 6.

    V. Diminishing expence XI

    10 or 7. 11 or 8.

    9

    X Polling every where in one day.

    1. Grey A o 1797. p.12

    12

    XI. Assimilating Scotch system of representation to England

    1. Brand A o 1810 p.15

    11

    XII. Excluding from seats persons holding offices without responsibility.

    1. Brand A o 1810 p.15