1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
[cvi. 312]
1823 Jany 24[?]
Economy as to Office
J.B. to Ternaux Inserenda - proposed but discarded
The less a man will take with it or the more he will give for it, the greater is his relish for it and the greater his relish for it, the greater the probability of his being fit for it. If the income the functionary has, is not sufficient to enable him to make a decent appearance in it, he will have recourse to mischievous expedients, it has been said, for the augmentation of it. Likely enough and if he thinks /in his expectation/ he can escape /evade/ punishment, so he will be his income ever so enormous, and the more enormous his income, the more easily will it be for him to escape punishment. The more ample and influential will be the circle of his adherents and protectors.
To know whether in addition to the necessary pay, any over pay is attached to an office, note the pay attached to an office of the same functions among the lowest-paid that are to be seen any where: for example in another part of your own country or in any foreign country, whose Institutions have grown out of yours, such as the Anglo American United States, not that even in that seat of comparatively good economy the maximum of good economy has in any of the States been reached. To reach it, attaching or not attaching to each office an income regarded as constituting a maintenance to the functionary invested with it, put up to auction the office with its power and emolument, and knock it down to the best bidder. Bondsmen in so far as pecuniary trustworthiness, and Public Examinations in so far as appropriate intellectual aptitude are requisite for the Office are here supposed.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1825. Dec r. Constitutional Code]Description: 1825. Dec r. Constitutional Code Ch. IX Ministers Collectively S.23 Remuneration. S.23S.11. Remuneration Art 1. Aptitude maximized, expence minimized indicated in these few words are the leading principles of this Constitution on the subject of remuneration. Art 2. As to the maximization of official aptitude, in this department, for the course taken in this view, see the next section, S.12. Locable who. Art 3. Subservient even to the maximization of aptitude is minimization of expence. For 1. Whatever he the occupations belonging to the office, the greater a man's relish for them is the greater his aptitude for it is likely to be. 2. The less the remuneration, in consideration of which he is willing to exercise those same occupations, the greater his relish for them. 3. Greater still if instead of perceiving, he is willing to pay for the faculty of exercising them. Art 4. So universal, the greater the expence employed in remuneration, the greater will be the opulence of the functionary so remunerated. But the greater his opulence, the less his appropriate aptitude will naturally be. For 1. The less will be his notoriety. 2. The greater his facility, for engaging in rival and merely pleasurable occupations. 3. The greater his facility, for obtaining accomplices in transgressions, and supporters to shield him against punishment and disrepute. 4. The more apt will he be to form an exaggerated estimate of the quantity of the expence, for which, on each several occasion, there may be a demand. Art 5.
-
Title: [1823 Feb. 16 Greek Constitut.]Description: 1823 Feb. 16 Greek Constitut. J.B.'s Articles with Reasons Functionaries, few 1. in the aggregate 2. in Offices taken singly 1. For every function /For all functions/ in the state except the highest and the lowest the smaller the number of functionaries employed the better. As to reasons. first see those for the general rule, then see those for the exceptions. Advantage economy 2. For each function taken separately the with the exception of the highest operative function, and the military of the lowest order, functionary no more than one. 1. The greater the number of wills the concurrence of which is necessary to the accomplishment of an object, the greater the chance of its non©accomplishment. In addition to the first, no fresh will can be admitted but a fresh chance of obstruction, designed or undesigned is admitted. Advantage Certainty 2. So the greater the delay by which the business may be retarded Advantage © Promptitude 3. By every functionary added to the first, especially if the power attached to the office is shared between the two, responsibility and the sort of security it affords for good behaviour against misconduct responsibility to a moral as well as a political purpose is lessened: moral responsibility i.e. to the purpose of censure at the hands of the Public Opinion Tribunal. In case of blame the public knows not which to fix on, each says: not I but he: and to the public it is not infrequently impossible on any just /competent/ /sufficient/ grounds to [...?] or to learn[?] which says true. Advantage, promoted aptitude 4. The greater the number implicated, the greater the number of those who have each of them his connections prepared on all /every/ occasion to support and defend him, and for the purpose of defending him to defend the rest. Advantage promoted aptitude again in this other way.
-
Title: [[xxxvi. 29] 1821. April 25.]Description: [xxxvi. 29] 1821. April 25. First Lines Constitutional Finance. Gratification to Monarch's pride. Master of the Horse knows nothing about Horses but employs those who do. As to the remainder of the most noble servant's salary, the good economy with which it is employed is not manifests itself in a different shape. Of the appetite to which, in the case of the Monarch, gratification is sought to be afforded, one, nor that the least voracious, is - that appetite for /or/ desire of esteem, respect, love, or at least the exterior evidences, true or false, of the existence of those inward sentiments - those accompaniments and securities for general obsequiousness - that desire which, notwithstanding the complicatedness of its object, is in one word commonly designated by the appellation of pride. Proportioned to the depth to which the humiliation of the individual at whose expense this gratification is afforded descends, is the intensity of the humiliation. But, proportioned to the antecedent elevation of this individual in the scale of dignity, natural or factitious or both together is the relative depth of the humiliation to which, on any given occasion, for any particular purpose, he is capable of lowering himself. By the holding the bridle of a favourite horse while the Royal Master is in the act of munting - by this or any other act done /performed/ in the execution of his office, the utmost length of the descent capable of being made by the man the magnitude of whose salary was determined by no higher mark of value than that which corresponded to the skill possessed and exercised by him in the field of this particular office and profession, would /could/ not at the utmost be any greater than that which corresponds to the difference between the salary /pay/ of this official functionary and the pay of an ordinary groom: say a quantity of a pay equal to ten times the amount of the pay of the groom, and the quantity of pay exactly equal to the amount of that lowest pay. But the amount of the salary /pay/ which, in consideration of the exalted station occupied by the titled and most noble though unskilled attendant upon horses, is ten times the amount of the salary /pay/ which it would be convenient and advisable to give /good management /economy/ would require to be given/ to the untitled but well-skilled functionary, and thereby a hundred times the amount of that which good economy would require to be given to the untitled and unskilled attendant.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1