date

1823. March 1 Greece. Division
1823. March 1

Greece.

Division of power

With the conflict between the King on the one part and the two branches of the Aristocracy on the other ceased all chance of ulterior benefit to the interest and condition of the people. Whatsoever real benefit had ever resulted to the people from that same division of power, became purely nominal, as soon as the contention between the parties sharing in it ceased. No sooner did that contention cease by the establishment of a new succession than a partnership between the formerly contending parties took its place: a partnership, the stock of which was at all times composed of such part of the property of the people as could be extracted from the owners on pretence of making provision for the expences of government. True it is that notwithstanding this bond of strength a sort of comparative weakness remained, in which the people have found a source of comparative advantage. To the single-headed despot by whom as in the Continent, all the powers of government would have been exercised succeeded in these islands a many-headed despot: and in the constitution of this beast of prey there is a sort of weakness which prevents him from driving on in the career of depredation and oppression, at a pace quite so rapid as that which has every where been kept up by a single-headed one. In this retardation consists the only real benefit derived from the above supposed or pretended sole and sufficient security for good government: for, sooner or later, the arrival of the vehicle at the bottom of the abyss is not less certain in the one case than in the other, unless in the mean time a government in the hands of the people should by some means or other be made to take place of a government in the hands of their natural and for ever implacable enemies.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1823. Feb. 23 Greece. J.B. to Greek Legislators]
    Description: 1823. Feb. 23 Greece. J.B. to Greek Legislators Independence Division of power

    Better? Yes: but why? Only because, and in so far as when a mass of power which

    is thus independent of the people is thus divided, there is at all times a

    chance of disagreement as between the possessors, and in so far as such

    disagreement leads to /is productive of/ public discussion a certainty of a sort

    of appeal on both parts to the people In this /in which/ case though the people

    not being capable of acting in a body as the two contending parties are can not

    make formal demands for themselves nor therefore obtain contracts as between

    equal and equal, yet the two contending parties while contending or the

    predominant one at the close of the contest, may feel or fancy itself under the

    necessity of doing something even /though it were/ at its own expence for the

    benefit of the people, or of the most influential part of it.

    Thus it was that in the days of King John of England, the contest for power

    between the King /Monarch/ and the Aristocracy terminated in that sort of paper

    security so celebrated under the name of Magna Charta. At the close of this

    contest as neither party could have contended with the other or could see any

    prospect of contending with the other in future without the assistance that part

    of the great mass of the people which were in the state of freedom as

    contradistinguished from domestic or [...?] slavery: so the security such as it

    was was extended to all such freedom. Now then taking the people in a body

    consisting suppose of four millions it was better then that sort of security

    whatever it was that was enjoyed /possessed/ as against depredation and

    oppression at the hands of a single despot should be in possession of each one

    of the number of two hundred thousand than that it should be confined to no more

    than two hundred: and such /this/ was the utility of the division of power such

    as it was that had place in that state of things compared with unity of power in

    the hands of one single despot.
  • Title: [1818 Sept. 6. Things as they are]
    Description: 1818 Sept. 6.

    Things as they are

    §. Best why last

    3

    Not so /Far otherwise/ in an age where printing still less where letters are unknown. By word of mouth alone for all purposes in general, in particular for the purpose of command and obedience command for the benefit and to the pleasure /comfort/ of the one, obedience at the charge and to the torment of the many that out of /beyond/ the arch of personal and continued intercourse government can not maintain itself.

    On the conquest made of England by the Norman bastard, the Commander in chief, being at the moment of victory the despot, found at his disposal the whole of the land with every person and every thing that was upon it. But to enjoy and even to take possession of the fruit of their several parts in the fruit of the victory, it was necessary that between the chief, on the one hand and his several immediate subordinates on the other a separation should take place. Beyond the limits of the possible field of his observation and inspection his power could avail him nothing. By /In/ the unsurmountable impotence which took place beyond the limits of the field one limit was set to the extent of the particular domain /portion reserved for his particular use/, how vast so ever in comparison of every other: in /by/ the cravings of his brethren in arms the chiefs whose power was subordinate to his another necessary cause of limitation manifested itself.

    When /No sooner did/ the dispersion No sooner had the dispersion taken place than the habit of general and constant obedience ceased: only when and for so long time and to such extent as the dispersion gave way to reunion, did was the habit of obedience removed. But even when renewed it was not in its original strength but in a state of comparative weakness that it was renewed: the longer the cessation the greater the diminution of its force.
  • Title: [1823. Feb. 23 Greece J.B. to Greek Legislators]
    Description: 1823. Feb. 23 Greece J.B. to Greek Legislators Independence Division of power

    But the greatest number © the great body of the people © the four millions ©

    what were they the better for it? Not in the least. Nor should they have been:

    never were they so much as thought of From their then present compleatly

    unsecure state they have been brought to their present so imperfectly secure

    state by the influence of other causes: causes of abundantly slow /snails©pace/

    operation, too complex to be capable of being here brought to view

    In the year 1688 came the Revolution so called by way of distinction

    /preeminence/ not to speak of any intermediate Revolutions On this occasion came

    the division of absolute power: the division between the Monarch on the one

    part, and the House of Lords with the Aristocrats whose wealth by the magnitude

    of it, or the form in which it had place gave them the command of the seats in

    the other House. Here was the division of power principle of division in all its

    glory: and the people © the greatest number what did they get by it? assuredly

    not absolutely nothing: what they got was the difference between the state of

    the people under the present English government and the state of the people

    under the Austrian Government: the difference between a quick pace and a slow

    pace in the descent to the abyss of national misery. Not to mention Williams and

    Anns wars which were to a considerable degree if not altogether wars of defence,

    they got George the first's War and George the 2d's German wars, and George the

    thirds American and French liberticide wars, the last of which, because

    according to the Englishmans creed /of English bigotry/ the King can do no wrong

    is with so much injustice placed to the account of William Pitt: they got

    moreover one after another upon their gulled and overloaded backs those

    milstones called Colonies: sources of patronage and emolument to the ruling few,

    drains on the pockets of the subject many who in return for the money extorted

    form them for the maintenance of that grievance /keeping up that ever running

    sore/, have the satisfaction of being taught to say in speaking of them © our

    Colonies.