1
results found in
21 ms
Page 1
of 1
1818 Sept. 20
Things as they are
2 o
Ch. Words and Phrases
§. Splendor
1
3. - subornation of universality No need of rewarding men for getting rich, no more than for eating or sexuality.
Pouring butter upon fat for fear it should not be rich enough
§ Splendor - lustre - of the Crown
Vast is the mass of mischief that may be seen lurking under this gorgeous covering.
Two distinct /separate/ masses of mischief may here be noted: / In this mass two distinguishable divisions may be noted/ 2. 1. the mischief flowing from /produced by/ the thing itself; 2. the mischief produced by the language by which it is thus brought to view.
1. Suppose it ever so innoxious, it is compleatly useless and /as well as/ needless. When the object is to impress men with the persuasion of its being needful or at any useful insinuation conveyed is - that it is useful at any rate if not needful to the securing of obedience and obsequiousness, to /on the part of the people at large, as towards/ the power which is seen lodged in the same hands: needful to the securing of obsequiousness as towards that individual will, obsequiousness as towards which is and on this occasion must be assumed to be necessary to the carrying on of the business of the government in a manner conducive to the universal interest.
A slight glance /consideration/ so it be an impartial one will suffice to shew how compleatly groundless this conception is. That of itself power should not suffice to support itself /for its own support/: that for its support it should require a quantity of the matter of wealth in enormous profusion, and in such shapes as to be productive /give birth/ to the most exaggerated conception of the same[?] magnitude, that whether for want of its ability to command respect or for whatever other cause power itself is of itself a feeble thing: so feeble that it requires glitter to support it.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1821 July 10 1822 Aug. 11. Codification]Description: 1821 July 10 1822 Aug. 11. Codification Offer? or First Lines Constitutional? Factitious Dignity excluded 2. Factitious mischievous III Factitious Dignity III Factitious Dignity. Power is purely mischievous as to all that is not needless /whatsoever of it is not needful/. Factitious Dignity is in the whole of it purely mischievous. At the expence of the whole - not only of the greatest number but of the whole, is all power created and conferred. At the expence of the whole, is all factitious dignity created and conferred Of operative power the constitutive cause and at the same time the immediate effect is not only obsequiousness but obedience on the part of him over /on/ whom it is exercised. Of factitious dignity the /an/ effect is not obedience indeed but obsequiousness on the part of those at whose expence it is created and conferred. In so far as it is productive of this effect, it is by producing in the minds of those at whose expence it is created the opinion of the existence of superiority either in respect of useful moral and intellectual endowments, or in respect of power, opulence, separately or collectively on the part of him on whom it is conferred, and by whom it is accordingly possessed. In so far as it is productive of obsequiousness though without actual obedience, it does not indeed confer power on the individual on whom it is conferred, but in his favour it produces the effect of power - conformity to /as towards/ his will. At the same time it creates and conferrs power and in much greater amplitude /quantity/ in favour of him by whom it is itself created and conferred, in favour of the patron of the dignity. For the patron of the dignity is himself the most dignified of all the dignitaries - possessors of the dignity of which be is patron. On the part /In the case/ of him on whom it is conferred - of him by whom it is possessed - in a word the Dignitary - so far as regards the possession of power and opulence this opinion is commonly well-grounded and just /true/. But in so far as regards the possession of /useful/ endowments moral and intellectual useful, namely to the greatest number and by means of a tendency to the augmentation of their happiness, it is not to this opinion but the reverse of it, that is well grounded and true. The cause of its being so is in this case the same as in the case of excessive opulence and superfluous power, as above.
-
Title: [[clx. 286] 1822 July 8 Constitut]Description: [clx. 286] 1822 July 8 Constitut. Code Rationale Securities Factitious honor ?.4. Evils produced by it The language employed on this occasion demonstrates in how deplorable a degree the power /force/ of the judgment /intellect/ may be debilitated /subdued/ by the force of delusion and custom /prejudice/. Always in the character of an object of prime necessity is the furniture of the great Toy-shop /Baby House/ this mass of the instruments of corruptive and delusive influence spoken of. This which is so much worse than useless is spoken of as of more importance than the whole aggregate of those benefit the preservation of /securing of/ which constitutes the only compensation for the evils necessarily produced by government - the only reason why it is better than /circumstance that distinguishes it from/ a nuisance Not any the faintest colour of reason being capable of being given for it, it is constantly /on every occasion/ taken for granted in the character of an incontestable truth. Ask in what way it contributes in the character of a means to the supposed /pretended/ end, no answer will you get /receive/. Ask in what particulars the governments in which there is no such splendor lustre, support of dignity has place ask in what particulars they are the worse for the want /absence/ of it, no answer will you receive. As in the situation of Monarch /King/ honor and dignity, require for their support splendor and lustre, that is to say money [...?] for the purpose out of the pockets of the people, so in every situation within the reach of the royal eyes. Hence it is that if a man be in a certain rank be in want of money whether it has been by misfortune or by prodigality or [...?] in any other shape that the want /gap/ has been produced, the deficiency is to be supplied at the expence of the laborious part of the people the productive classes are to be squeezed for money to fill it up. Incessant are the complaints of the expence of affording to the helpless many the lower order /productive classes/ those supplies without which starvation and death must of necessity be their fate: profound is the silence as to the expence of supplying to the extravagant in the higher order the means of further /ulterior/ extravagance. Grievous the complaints of the overgrowth of that part of the population for the subsistence /maintenance/ of which ,10 a year all [...? ...?] and all ages together included will suffice - no complaint of the overgrowth of that part for the maintenance of which ,100 a year will not suffice.
-
Title: [7 Oct 1815 Jug. True. Ch. Conditions]Description: 7 Oct 1815 Jug. True. Ch. Conditions 4 By obedience, if it be but sufficiently entire, constant and universal or at any rate sufficiently extensive everything will be furnished which it is in a man’s power to furnish. Has he money,[?] he will furnish money. Has he arms he will if wanted furnish arms: has he legs he will if wanted furnish MS orig. ‘furnished’. legs. Has he but one arm or one leg he will furnish that one arm or that one leg. Obedience howsoever entire obedience in the part of a set of servants towards their common master would not avail—it could not exist—or if it did exist it would not suffice for the attainment of the great end of ends without harmony among themselves one among one another. This harmony is designated either Charity, or at any rate a branch of it. And thus the triad is compleat. As long as a man has any other dependence, obedience will not be as entire as it might be. One instrument or subject of dependence is property present property, property at present in hand, two other objects of dependence are industry including skill in this or that profit-seeking vocation, and providence. Property, industry, providence—in these three therefore may be seen so many obstacles to obedience, to that plenary and unreserved obedience, which in the part of every individual engaged under the universal leader in such an enterprize was if not indispensably necessary at any rate incontestably useful and highly desirable in and for such an enterprize. 7. By obedience, if entire constant and extensive enough every thing needful is furnished. 8. Still it would not avail, at least not suffice, without harmony. This harmony is either Charity or a branch of it. 9. On the part of any man, so long as he has any other dependence or support, obedience is not so entire as it might be. Subjects of dependence are 1. property, 2. industry (including particular skill). 3. providence or [...?].
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1