1
results found in
17 ms
Page 1
of 1
1822 May 10
Economy etc Text?
12 May 1822 Quere in what place if any shall use be made of the matter of this
sheet?
6 The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the hand or hands
in which the supreme Executive power is placed be subordinate to the supreme
legislative body in all modes of subordination: namely 1. by power of cessation:
2. by power of command on pain of punishment. 3. by power of punishment. 4. by
power of dislocation but not 5. by non-concurrence.
Principle of exclusion of Anarchy Anarchy-inhibiting principle
Q. The supreme legislative power and the /a/ supreme super Executive power why in
the same hand?
A. Suppose for simplicity of conception suppose the Supreme Executive power to be
in the hand of a single functionary. If he were not displaceable by the supreme
legislative functionary or body of functionaries their power might by him be
reduced to impotence If he were not punishable by that same legislative body, he
might before the dislocation could be effected produce mischief indefinitely
intense, extensive and irremediable. He might for example put to death the
members of it in any number. If, so far as depended upon their power and the
orders given in consequence he were dislocated - he might refuse to submitt to
those same orders.
7. The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the Office of
Supreme Executive Functionary be in the hand of a single individual. Stile him
for example President /Supreme Director/ of the Commonwealth. Reasons 1.
Principle Responsibility securing principle 2 Expence minimizing principle. 3.
Complication inhibiting principle.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1822 May 10 Economy etc Text?]Description: 1822 May 10 Economy etc Text? Minimal[?] = marginal[?] location Examples and Observations - i.e. Facts observed. Quere if not superseded this sheet May 12? 1. The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that with reference to the possessor or possessors of the supreme operative power the constitutive power be in the hands of the greatest number, viz of apt hands: apt in respect of literary acquirements. 2 The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the supreme operative power legislative and Super Executive should be in the hands of a body corporate body, the Members thereof located by Election performed by so many assemblages of such of the Members of the whole community as are endowed with adequate appropriate aptitude, relation had to such their functions: the assemblages being determined by the local Districts which they inhabit and each Member being elected by the apt inhabitants of one such District: no inhabitant voting /deliver his vote/ in Districts more than one: each such Member being intituled /stiled/ a Deputy or say a Delegate of the People: and the whole Assembly the Congress of the Deputies of the people: or say for shortness the Congress 3. The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the supreme legislative power being in the hands of a Congress composed of the Deputies or Delegates of the People located as above, the supreme super-executive power be in these same hands Principle Anarchy-inhibiting principle 4. The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the powers of the Delegates of the people be exercised by the whole number sitting and acting in an undivided body: no other divisions having place but such as are effected by that same body itself: by its forming out of itself for example under the name of Committees Sections out of itself, each Section subordinate and responsible to the whole. Principles. 1 Delay-prohibiting principle. 2. Expence-prohibiting principle. 3. Complication prohibiting principle.
-
Title: [1823. Feb. 21 Greece Beginning]Description: 1823. Feb. 21 Greece Beginning The greatest happiness etc /principle/ requires that the power of the Executive department be lodged in a single hand. Reasons © 1. Certainty of the conformity of the functionary's conduct to the will of the Supreme Operative /Legislative/ maximized. 2. Promptitude of execution, maximized: 3. Responsibility to legal and popular sanctions maximized: 4. Expence minimized. The greatest happiness principle requires that the immediate displacing of this functionary be at all times in the power of the Legislative. Reason. Certainty of conformity as above. By no other means could any such certainty be produced, or any approach to it made. If for a day together it were in the power of this functionary to resist the declared will of the supreme Legislative, he would thereby for and during that time be in possession of an equal share in the legislative power in addition to the whole of the Executive.
-
Title: [1822 May 17 Economy Ch. 5 Search]Description: 1822 May 17 Economy Ch. 5 Search for Money Maximized 1. III. Security 3. Minimizing money at disposal of highest functionaries. 1. Necessary the office of Chief Executive functionary 2. Desirable its being in a single hand. 3. Necessary in his hands to a great extent power of locating subordinates. 4. And of dislocating them. 2. Necessary to an indeterminate extent power of remuneration for engaging their acceptance. 3. For aptly executing functions to which no power is attached, men may be engaged by compulsion, witness privates in military service by land and sea. Not for executing functions to which power is attached: evil consequence would be desertion and negligence: things of persons subject to their power would remain unemployed or ill—employed. For not doing that which it is not known he can do man can not be punished. 4. Pay therefore can not be altogether withdrawn from office — of offices to a large extent the location can not be in any other hand than that of a chief executive functionary who himself is in a state of subordination to the situation of the body in which as above the greatest happiness of the greatest number requires that the suppressed operative power be lodged. 5. Preventing chief—functionary from producing in the minds of the legislative functionaries by giving endowed offices to others, the same effect as if those offices were given to themselves is not possible: for I. Of the communication of benefit from the endowed functionary to the legislative functionary, no adequate evidence can the nature of the case afford. II. Laws not enactible. 1. Law punishing A the legislative functionary for B's acceptance of an office. 2. Law invalidating the the location of every man having any connection of 5 contin d. of interest or sympathy with any legislative functionary. 3. Law, by punishment or invalidation, inhibiting A from being motivated by a kindness done to B. 4. Law, inhibiting A from doing the will of C on account of his having done, or being expected to do a kindness to B. 6. As a means of preventing a legislative functionary from doing the sinister will of the Chief Executive (giver of good gifts) to propose a law inhibiting d o functionary from receiving such gifts himself is imbecility or hypocrisy & treachery: imbecility if he sees not the inexpediency; treachery if he does — the tendency of such false being to avert the public mind from efficient d o.: to cause men to think the sinister sacrifice is already prevented, as well as intended to be prevented: whereas it is intended to be promoted. Axiom of psychological pathology — Qui facit per alium, facit per se. 7. Placing this within reach of legislative per se functionary good gifts at the disposal of the Chief Executive, is sowing in the Constitution seeds of corruptive influence: enabling and exciting Executive and Executive to become accomplices in trust—breaking (like placing flesh in ) circumstances, yet this is the work of necessity & unavoidable. 8. For preventing effective corruption, i.e. joint performance of the sinister sacrifice, sole means minimizing the quantity & value of the matter of corruption in Chief functionaries, with the application of counterforces as below. This the Interest of both that the quantity and value if it be maximized.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1