1
results found in
22 ms
Page 1
of 1
1822 May 12
Economy etc
Functionaries in a corrupt government the most hardened of misdoers.
Q. Are there any and if any what description of individual /persons/ which the
greatest happiness principle /of the greatest number/ requires to be excluded
from the faculty of contributing by their votes to the location of the
functionaries invested with the supreme operative power as above
A. Yes: all such in whom such properties have place as render them deficient in a
degree adequate to the purpose of exclusion in respect of any of the several
elements of appropriate aptitude: moral, scientific judiciary, or active.
Q. What if any are the circumstances /those properties/ by which with reference
to the function in question an individual is divested /is rendered destitute/ of
the requisite and indispensable portion of moral aptitude?
A. None whatever. In the case of a public functionary possessing of himself a
share of /in the/ supreme operative power the branch of unaptitude opposite to
moral aptitude is neither more nor less than the constant disposition to
sacrifice to his own personal interest the universal interest. But suppose /if/
an equal share of the constitutive power in question is in the hands of every
one of the members /member/ of the community in question the aggregate of the
several personal interests is itself the universal interest.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1822 May 12 Economy etc .2. Cause]Description: 1822 May 12 Economy etc .2. Cause or Security 1. Identification of personal with universal interest. Q. What are the /employable/ means employable for the identification of personal with public situations in the highest grade and, in particular, situations invested with the supreme operative power A. 1. In regard /As/ to the corresponding constitutive power lodging it in the hands of those members of the community whose interest constitutes the universal interest. Say maximizing the numbers of those individuals among whom the constitutive power with reference to the supreme operative power is shared Breaking down this same constitutive power into the smallest fractions Leaving the aggregate constitutive power broken down into as many fractions as the community has members: spacial causes of exclusion excepted. /saved./ 2. In regard /As/ to the supreme operative power, lodging that also in a multitude of hands, in such sort as not to be exercisable by them but /otherwise than/ in conjunction. Say Fractionalizing the supreme operative power. 3 In regard to the functionaries invested with /possessing/ these fractions of supreme operative power rendering them responsible to the possessors of the fractions of constitutive power. Say Rendering the supreme operative responsible to the supreme constitutive functionaries.
-
Title: [[xxxviii. 6] 1822 May 26 Economy]Description: [xxxviii. 6] 1822 May 26 Economy etc /Constitut. Code/ Ch.2 Securities for moral aptitude Security 1. Identification of governors /rulers/ with governed's /subjects/ interest. .1. In what it consists 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 .2. Necessity of this identification to greatest happiness etc. 6. 7. .3. How it has place when the supreme operative power is in the delegates of all the inhabitants .4 Opposition of rulers to subjects interest trustees to principals interest - its detrimental consequences with relation to greatest happiness etc 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. .5 Modes of inaptitude on the part of rulers, in so far as such oppositeness has place. 14. 15 .6. In case of extensive oppositeness sole remedy against misrule, change of form of government, change of functionaries useless. 16. 17. 7 Different ways in which this security applies to the situation of supreme constitutive and that of supreme operative functionaries. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22 Ch.3 Security 2. Subordinateness of supreme operative to supreme constitutive functionaries. .1. For producing this subordinateness what modes of subordination apt /applicable/, what unapt. .2. Apt mode 1. Dislocability of the subordinates by the superordinates, periodically applied .3. Do incidentally applied. .4. Apt mode 2. Punibility of the subordinates by the superordinates .5. Unapt modes: viz. 1. Inability to originate measures without concurrence of the superordinate. 2. Need of cooperation of do 3. Suspensibility of measures by do 4. Cessability of measures by do Ch. Security 3. Diminution of supreme Operative functionaries power by other means.
-
Title: [1822 May 25 Economy etc .2]Description: 1822 May 25 Economy etc .2. Efficient causes of or Employable Securities for appropriate Official Aptitude in its several branches, enumerated and explained. I Moral Aptitude - Securities for its existence /it./ 1. Identification of individual with universal interest in the situation of possessors of the supreme Constitutive power. 2/1/. Minimizing power in the situations of the possessors of the supreme Operative power. 3/2/. Minimizing money in the situations /hands/ /disposal/ of the possessors of the supreme Operative power and their subordinates 4/3/. Minimizing the quantity of money /factitious remuneration and moneys worth/ applied in remuneration of the services of public functionaries possessors of the supreme operative power and their subordinates. /4. Exclusion or abolition of factitious dignity/ 5. Maximizing legal responsibility - i.e. eventual subjection to legal punishment in the situations of possessors of the supreme Operative power and their Subordinates. 6. Maximizing moral responsibility - i.e. subjection to reproach at the hands of the Public Opinion Tribunal by which the force /power/ of the Moral or Popular Sanction is applied as a counterforce to the legal power of the state
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1