1822 May 12

Economy etc

Functionaries in a corrupt government the most hardened of misdoers.

Q. Are there any and if any what description of individual /persons/ which the

greatest happiness principle /of the greatest number/ requires to be excluded

from the faculty of contributing by their votes to the location of the

functionaries invested with the supreme operative power as above

A. Yes: all such in whom such properties have place as render them deficient in a

degree adequate to the purpose of exclusion in respect of any of the several

elements of appropriate aptitude: moral, scientific judiciary, or active.

Q. What if any are the circumstances /those properties/ by which with reference

to the function in question an individual is divested /is rendered destitute/ of

the requisite and indispensable portion of moral aptitude?

A. None whatever. In the case of a public functionary possessing of himself a

share of /in the/ supreme operative power the branch of unaptitude opposite to

moral aptitude is neither more nor less than the constant disposition to

sacrifice to his own personal interest the universal interest. But suppose /if/

an equal share of the constitutive power in question is in the hands of every

one of the members /member/ of the community in question the aggregate of the

several personal interests is itself the universal interest.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1822 May 12 Economy etc .2. Cause]
    Description: 1822 May 12

    Economy etc .2. Cause or Security 1. Identification of personal

    with universal interest.

    Q. What are the /employable/ means employable for the identification of personal

    with public situations in the highest grade and, in particular, situations

    invested with the supreme operative power

    A. 1. In regard /As/ to the corresponding constitutive power lodging it in the

    hands of those members of the community whose interest constitutes the universal

    interest. Say maximizing the numbers of those individuals among whom the

    constitutive power with reference to the supreme operative power is shared

    Breaking down this same constitutive power into the smallest fractions Leaving

    the aggregate constitutive power broken down into as many fractions as the

    community has members: spacial causes of exclusion excepted. /saved./

    2. In regard /As/ to the supreme operative power, lodging that also in a

    multitude of hands, in such sort as not to be exercisable by them but /otherwise

    than/ in conjunction. Say Fractionalizing the supreme operative power.

    3 In regard to the functionaries invested with /possessing/ these fractions of

    supreme operative power rendering them responsible to the possessors of the

    fractions of constitutive power. Say Rendering the supreme operative responsible

    to the supreme constitutive functionaries.
  • Title: [[xxxviii. 6] 1822 May 26 Economy]
    Description: [xxxviii. 6]

    1822 May 26

    Economy etc /Constitut. Code/

    Ch.2 Securities for moral aptitude

    Security 1. Identification of governors /rulers/ with governed's /subjects/ interest.

    .1. In what it consists 1. 2. 3. 4. 5

    .2. Necessity of this identification to greatest happiness etc. 6. 7.

    .3. How it has place when the supreme operative power is in the delegates of all the inhabitants

    .4 Opposition of rulers to subjects interest trustees to principals interest - its detrimental consequences with relation to greatest happiness etc 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.

    .5 Modes of inaptitude on the part of rulers, in so far as such oppositeness has place. 14. 15

    .6. In case of extensive oppositeness sole remedy against misrule, change of form of government, change of functionaries useless. 16. 17.

     7 Different ways in which this security applies to the situation of supreme constitutive and that of supreme operative functionaries. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22

    Ch.3 Security 2. Subordinateness of supreme operative to supreme constitutive functionaries.

    .1. For producing this subordinateness what modes of subordination apt /applicable/, what unapt.

    .2. Apt mode 1. Dislocability of the subordinates by the superordinates, periodically applied

    .3. Do incidentally applied.

    .4. Apt mode 2. Punibility of the subordinates by the superordinates

    .5. Unapt modes: viz.

    1. Inability to originate measures without concurrence of the superordinate.

    2. Need of cooperation of do

    3. Suspensibility of measures by do

    4. Cessability of measures by do

    Ch. Security 3. Diminution of supreme Operative functionaries power by other means.
  • Title: [1822 May 25 Economy etc .2]
    Description: 1822 May 25

    Economy etc

    .2. Efficient causes of or Employable Securities for appropriate Official

    Aptitude in its several branches, enumerated and explained.

    I Moral Aptitude - Securities for its existence /it./

    1. Identification of individual with universal interest in the situation of

    possessors of the supreme Constitutive power.

    2/1/. Minimizing power in the situations of the possessors of the supreme

    Operative power.

    3/2/. Minimizing money in the situations /hands/ /disposal/ of the possessors of

    the supreme Operative power and their subordinates

    4/3/. Minimizing the quantity of money /factitious remuneration and moneys worth/

    applied in remuneration of the services of public functionaries possessors of

    the supreme operative power and their subordinates.

    /4. Exclusion or abolition of factitious dignity/

    5. Maximizing legal responsibility - i.e. eventual subjection to legal punishment

    in the situations of possessors of the supreme Operative power and their

    Subordinates.

    6. Maximizing moral responsibility - i.e. subjection to reproach at the hands of

    the Public Opinion Tribunal by which the force /power/ of the Moral or Popular

    Sanction is applied as a counterforce to the legal power of the state