1
results found in
21 ms
Page 1
of 1
18 Jan y 1803 + (8 Art 1
N o 12. ib. p. 19. September 1797. "As the Masters
were " seldom refused permission to ship such as
were free" .. From this passage it follows that at this time likewise
though these were but few instances, yet there were some
in which such permission was
refused.
N o 13 ib. p. 45. August 1797.
Sailed the Britannia and the Ganges "The Commander "of the
latter was permitted to take on board
several Convicts "that had become free."
N o 14. p. 125. September 1798. Sailed the Barwell for
China. The Commander was allowed to on board
about 50 "persons who had completed their period of transportation."
N o 15. p. 57. October 1797. "Decreasing daily as did
the "number of working men in the employ of government, yet"
[at this time it is stated that "the Governor could not refuse granting certificates to
such "convicts as had served their respective terms of transportation;
"and no less than 128 men were at this time certified
"by him to be free. Most of these people had no "other view in
obtaining this certificate than the enabling
"them when an opportunity offered to quit the
settlement, in "following their own pursuits untill
that time should arrive." Could not refuse?
— why so? We had without any difficulty refused on the former
occasions, mentioned N os 1,3,4,5,7,10 what was
there to prevent him now? From it should seem that by this time
some legal some scruples had arisen in some breast or other
either in the Colony or at home: and from thence it was, in
the first place that the grant of the certificate was
at or about the expiration of each man's term regarded
as in some measure obligatory; in the next place that the effect of
such certificate when obtained was to confer on the individual
the liberty of departure; a prima facie liberty at any rate,
though
probably subject at all times to revocation by special
order. at any time.
N o 16. p. 298. August 1800. " Several certificates were "granted this month,
to persons who had served their terms of transportation."
Similar Items
-
Title: [18 Jan y 1803 + (6 N o 7. p.268.]Description: 18 Jan y 1803 + (6 N o 7. p.268. 19 th February 1792. Intention executed. On this day sailed for Canton, the Bellona. Into this ship had been received six persons from the Settlement: two of them, Expirees, by permission; two others, Expirees also, but without permission: the remaining two, Non-Expirees. The four latter it is stated that they had been "secreted": also that they were "discovered"; "the ship "being ." Thus they were accordingly re-landed at least, if not otherwise punished, may be pretty safely concluded, though not expressly mentioned. Of the two Non-expirees it is stated, that "they had "not yet served the full period of their sentences. From this it seems not unreasonable to conclude that they would have their full period would have arrived, before their arrival in Great Britain. If so neither then by their arrival, as with is any more than by their departure would have been thing they gone beyond the exercise of their (restored rights. N o 9. p.268 15 February . 1793. At this time the expectation "about the clause." . . in the Charter "party, for preventing Shipmasters from receiving any "person. . . from the Colony without the express consent "and order of the Governor," was found to be realized. The Bellona came provided with this Clause. She had sailed from England on the 8 th of August 1792. N o 9 p. 283. 24 th April 1793. Intention executed a second time. Sailed the Shah Hormurias and Chesterfield. But few Convicts [Expirees] were " allowed to quit the Colony in these ships. [the] The ships were two. On a subsequent occasion in November 1794, the number received on board the same number of ships (the Endeavour and the Fancy) had been near a hundred: whereof by permission, 50; without permission near 50 more. ib., p. 398.
-
Title: [18 Jan y 1803 + (7 N o 10. p. 316]Description: 18 Jan y 1803 + (7 N o 10. p. 316. 2 dOctober 1793. Intention executed a third time.— Sailed the Boddington and Sugarcane for Bengal: "From the Sugarcane "were brought up this day ... two " Expirees: "they had "got on board without permission. "... Punished with 90 "lashes each, and sent up to Toongabbe." In M r Collins 2 Volumes In the continuation of the history, in express statements of detention . have been met with . The historian not being at this time present in the Colony, the precision exhibited in the former volume no longer presents itself in the same degree. During this latter period, [+] [+] the conception which it seems to be the object to present to view, is rather that of the removal of the restraint than the continuation of it. It is not however the less perceptible, that even at this time it was restraint that constituted the general rub, and that whatever instances of the exercise of the opposite liberty took place, were the result of so many special permissions, and constituted but so many exceptions to the rule. the object seen impression that seems intended to be conveyed, is that of the non-existence of removal of all restraints any bar on the liberty of departure, in the case of Expirees. Grant this It appears however notwithstanding, that the existence of this liberty was by no means restraint was still the general rule, and that liberty, though frequently granted took place not without special permission, not any other-wise than as an exemption to the general rule. N o 11. II p.11 6 th December 1796. "Although they every day saw that this obstacle was thrown in the way of the "Convict who had got through the period of his transportation "with credit and a good character, but that he was suffered to depart with the marks of any ship who would receive "him, and a certificate given to him of his being a free man, yet & By this it appears as plainly that among Expirees themselves some were detained as well as others there were some, to whom the liberty of departure was refused, as it does that there were others to whom it was granted.
-
Title: [18 Jan y 1803 + (4 N o 3. p. 159.]Description: 18 Jan y 1803 + (4 N o 3. p. 159. April 1791. Information given by the Governor to the Convicts "that none would be permitted to "quit the Colony who had wives and children incapable "of maintaining themselves and likely to become burthensome "to the settlement, until they had found sufficient "security for the maintenance of such wives or children " as long as they might continue after them. " Considering the latitude of the discretion assumed by some of these terms, this notice may be considered as a pretty effectual embargo upon the whole married part of the community of Expirees. N o 4 p. 169. July 1792. Information given by the Governor to the Expirees that those who wished not to become Settlers in New South Wales were .." to work there for twelve or eighteen months certain, and that afterwards " no obstacles "would be thrown in the way of their return to England:" but that as to assistance", for any such purpose nobody was to expect it. N o 5. p. 190. 3 d December 1791. Sailed the Active and Albermarle for India. After their departures, Expirees were missing. "Previous to thus sailing the Governor was aware "of an intention on the part of the Seamen to facilitate such "their departure. He therefore instructed the Master, to "deliver any persons whom he might discover to be on "board without permission to quit the Colony, as prisoners "to the Commanding Officer of the first British Settlement "they should touch at in India." N o 6. p.208. April 1792 Expirees were by this time, it is said became "numerous". To 14 of them, "the choice "of the place where they (those freemen) "were to labour" (i.e. to be forced to labour) is stated as "an indulgence."
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1