date

20 Aug 1809 + Parl y Reform
20 Aug 1809 +

Parl y Reform

Influence V.

Corruption

'. Office corrupts more than Bribe.

1

1

A contrivance (flimsy) for defending and [...?] or the cases in which it is most efficient and impressive.

'. Office is more corruptive than any /a/ bribe.

But a distinction is /has been/ taken, & owed[?] there are certain shapes forsooth[?], in which the application of a matter of good, though applied under the same conditions, and to produce the same line of conduct as it is applied to produce in the case where the application of it would be corruptive and bribery beyond dispute, is neither the one nor the other. And which are these cases? precisely those in which its influence is most feasible and irresistible.

For a Member to receive of a Member a bribe - say in the shape of a Banknote of ,10 or ,500 or ,1000, is dishonest wicked scandalous, shameful, in a word whatsoever in your indignation you may be pleased to call it. And why dishonest? - because by the conditions in which it is given the member by whom it is received engages himself to the Minister by whom it is administered, to give his vote and support to some one[?] measure which perhaps he thinks a bad one and to which perhaps he would not have given his vote or his support otherwise {- Now in this case where is the dependence of the Member? where is the dependence of the person corrupted on his corruptor? - None.}

For a /the same or any other/ Member to receive of the same or any other Minister not merely the ,500 or the ,1000 once paid, the ,5000 or the ,1,000 by which no dependence is created, but a place with or without duty, with or without dignity and power attached to it bringing in to him each and every year while he continues in possession of it a repetition of this same ,500 or ,1,000 - in all this there is nothing but what is fair and honourable. But why honourable the acceptance this so much greater portion of the matter of good while in the other case the acceptance of a so much lesser portion is so base and scandalous. By the base compact, the Trustee was barred /stood engaged[?]/ to nothing more than the committing a breach of trust on some one occasion at some one single instance. By the honourable compact he stands engaged to committ during his continuance in the receipt of this permanent bribe
Similar Items
  • Title: [22 Aug 1809 Parl y Reform Corruption]
    Description: 22 Aug 1809

    Parl y Reform

    Corruption

    Electors

    3

    It is from /by/ the application /use/ made of it in other instances that the word bribery has contracted /become associated with/ that idea of depravity, which, when the case comes to be examined into, will /is/ not be found to adhere /belong/ to it in this. It is not only scandalous but flagitious /pernicious/ /wicked/, and still more pernicious than it is scandalous, for an exciseman, for example, or any other collector of the public revenues to receive a bribe from a contributor. - Why? because what is certain is that in this case the bribe would not be given, if the interest of the people in respect of their /the/ revenue necessary to their preservation did not suffer by it. Bribery in that case can not take place, but that evil must ensue: the evil that in that case ensues can not ensue but that the author of it must know of it.

    But here in this case, no mischief does take place in consequence of the bribe, no mischief unless by accident is by the receiver of the bribe supposed to take place in consequence of the acceptance he has given to it, so much as supposed to take place.
  • Title: [1819 May 25 Defence of | | Ballot]
    Description: 1819 May 25

    Defence of | | Ballot

    Caucussing

    2. beneficial

    10

    1. Walsham[?]. 2. Whitlock[?]

    Thus then by /in the/ recommending of a Candidate who {in the opinion of the Electors in general} were /on trial should prove/ on any account pre-eminently unfit, or even one who {in the opinion of the Electors in general} /that on trial/ should be found in a considerable degree below par, all who concurred or were regarded as concurring in the recommendation would see /behold/ a sure cause of the loss of their influence or what is the same thing in other words of their situation in this all-directing board. Among the members of it, suppose this or that one disposed to receive {and accordingly actually receiving} a bribe and in virtue of that bribe to give his recommendation in favour of a worthless Candidate, suppose this disposition /situation/ fully understood by one of the Candidates and in case of an adequate prospect of success, the Candidate fully prepared to give the bribe. Even Under these circumstances would the bribe be given? No. For by no recommendation which could be given by this one member would /could/ the effect be produced, to be produced a correspondent recommendation would need to be given by a majority or at the least by a large proportion of the other Members. As in the case of the firstmentioned member so in the case of each of these others, here there would be the necessity of a fresh bribe. But in no one of all these instances could the offer of any such bribe be made but there must be at the least two persons each of whom would have put his reputation in the power of the other: and though for his own sake each might during his own life persevere in forebearing to destroy the reputation of the other, yet upon his death the same interest no longer operating with the same force upon those who by intimacy with him would have been partakers in the secret, upon /thus on/ the death of the other party each party to the disreputable /scandalous/ contract would see the probable exposure of the shame.
  • Title: [1[?] Jan y 1810 Parl y Reform]
    Description: 1[?] Jan y 1810

    Parl y Reform

    1 '.4.

    Ch.12. IV Bribery of [...?]

    '.4.

    '.4. Mischief to Bribe giver's mind

    10

    1

    '.4. Mischief to the Bribe giver's mind.

    {For shortness this section may vie with one /a chapter/ of Montesquieu.}

    If the conduct of him by whom, for a vote /given/ on a particular occasion given, given in a "dry and sordid" shape is received as scandalous, need {the state of} his mind in respect thereof reputed /deemed and taken/ tainted and contaminated, the mind of him by whom the "dry and sordid matter" is administered, will not it is perceived be to be found in a state very distinguishably /clearly/ /in any very high degree/ different?

    Of what quality so ever the effect be which is produced or endeavoured to be produced , the concurrence /action/ of both these agents is employed in or towards the production of it.

    But the situation of the bribes being /is/ that of donor, and the situation of the person bribed /corrupted/ being that of one who at his hands has received /receives/ a benefit - the briber /corruptor/ the person in whose breast the design which is brought to bear originated being moreover the corruptor, the situation of the corrupted party seems in general to be considered as being of the two the most scandalous, that of the corrupt or the least scandalous.

    Much however in this as in all other cases depends upon "greatness of character" and "height of situation": insomuch that, if in the case in question the predicament /behaviour/ of him to whom the bribe /matter of corruption/ is administered be of the two commonly deemed and taken to be the more scandalous, that of him by whom it is administered the less scandalous, and the "taint and contamination" of the mind less deep and dark coloured, it is only because, and therefore in so far as the person by whom the said matter of corruption is administered is more apt to belong to the class of great characters than to the class of humans[?], or other little ones.