1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
25 Dec r 1809 ' 6
Parl y Reform Influences
Number
10
XI
Olim viz. temp. Gul um, points might be carried by corruption[?] a few individuals: but this was before the King with the royal corruption[?] system was thoroughly established
Modo[?] nothing could be thus done - Nabob of Arcet[?] his few members where a man who has a seat puts in a friend - it is this case; and what does this do
{' Corruptor, an individual.}
{No mischief done but in so far as the corruptor[?] member gives himself to a corrupt administration - viz in possession or in expectancy.}
{'.6.II Corruptor and individual - 1 Mischief to the public.}
{We come now to the case where the corruptor the person in whose dependence the Member is placed, or by whom dependent or independent he has been seated is - not the Minister - not the agent of the King, but some insulated individual.}
Here the act of corruption in so far as on the active side of the transaction any act has had place is in name at least the same, as in the former case: so the immediate result of that act the dependence, if it be a case of dependence. Every thing in last[?] is the same except the consequences - the only material consequences.
Similar Items
-
Title: [K[?] Aug 1809 P.III. Electors Parl]Description: K[?] Aug 1809 P.III. Electors Parl. y Ref. m Part. II. Influence &c. Ch. 14 Corruption Electors Electors 2 {Ordo 23 Dec r 1809 I. Situation, that of a Member[?] 1. Mischief of dependence of corruption – to the public 2 – to the Member’s mind 3. To corrupting Ministers mind[?] II. Situation, that of Elector 4. Mischief of his dependence and corruption to the state – 5. – to his mind. 6. to the mind of the Member who corrupts him. §.1. Generalia[?] §.2* I Corrupter, the converse[?] 1. Mischief to the public. §.3 – 2. Mischief to corrupted Member’s mind §.4 – 3. – to corrupting Ministers mind. §.5. 4 – to corrupting King’s mind Corruption continual §.6 II. Corruptor an individual patron of the act[?] Mischief to public. §.7. – 2. Corruptor d o continual mischief to corrupted Member’s mind. §.8. – 3 – Corruptor[?] d o continual mischief to Corrupting patrons mind. §.9 III Corruption: by sale and purchase of seat Mischief to date (none) §.10. Mischief to purchaser’s mind. §.11 Mischief to seller’s mind. IV. §.12. 13. 14. Corruption occasional, efficient cause a fee[?] money, a fixt sum Mischief 1 to Stable[?] 2. to corruptee’s[?] mind, to corruptor’s mind §.15. 16. 17. 18. Corruption occasional efficient cause a sum unliquidated – or a benefit in any other shape.
-
Title: [Dec r 1809 + '.1 Parl y Reform]Description: Dec r 1809 + '.1 Parl y Reform Ch.6 Parl. Corruptor Member {'.2.} {Note[?]} [...?] 1 1 Ch.6. Corruption &c. its mischiefs in the case of a Member I. The corruption habitual; Corruptor, the Crown. '.1.2. Mischief to the state. {' Corruption /The disorder/, and corrupt dependence and obsequiousness considered in its application to the situation of Members. 1. The effect on the state of the nation.} Of the effect of the disorder on the state of the nation /national interest at large/ little need here be said. Over and over again the necessity has occurred of holding it up to view has presented itself. Misrule in all its shapes: to the separate interests not only of the King but of his agents, especially all such as have /having/ access to his royal person the interests of all the rest of the people made /offered up/ a continual sacrifice. To reform in all its shapes - even to improvement in all its shapes, such few excepted in which the interest of the few /small population/ of whom the governing classes are composed take the lead, an [...?] door /bar/ opposed: upon each particular occasion whensoever it can be done without too much danger of disturbance to royal and aristocratical < > from popular /democratical/ discontent and glamour, the pecuniary interest {the power} the ease the reputation of the subject many sacrificed to the pecuniary interest, the power, the ease, the reputation and the vengeance of the domineering /ruling/ few.
-
Title: [15 Dec r 1809 Parl y Reform]Description: 15 Dec r 1809 Parl y Reform Influences Ch. Mischief of Dependence 3 7 Of all this argument what is all this while the object? - what is it that it is brought to prove? Simply this, viz. that be the trust what it may, be the bribe what it may, be he that /who/ is ready to offer it who he may, be the trustee who he may, the trust is not so likely to be well and faithfully executed by him in case of his being at liberty, as in case of his not being at liberty to take bribes - to take money on condition of his being obsequiousness to the will and thence subservient to the interest of the corruptor and doing in the exercise of it such and such acts, being acts beneficial and serviceable to the personal interest of the corruptor, whatsoever be the mischief done by them to the interest of the trust in a word that therefore a trustee ought /should/ not on this or that individual occasion accept to his own use of any one who offers it money or money's worth on condition of his doing under or by colour of the authority given to him by the trust any /this or that/ act at the choice of him by whom such gift is tendered: that in a word for a vote to be given by him on this or that one particular occasion a Member ought /should/ not if it be possible to prevent it be /preventive[?] be/ suffered to accept of money or money's worth from an individual /a private/ hand.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1