date

[Copyist's hand] 1818 July 31
[Copyist's hand]

1818 July 31

Parl Ref Bill

Reasons

II. Electors who

Reading

Poor Education

3

18

18

Thus it hath been done, and thus it ever shall continue to be done so long as the Constitution fashioned as it has been by such means and for such purposes /and by such means/ continues as it is: meaning always in a state of Gradual, and thence the more quiet and sure progression from worst to worse.

Now - not to speak of Peers and Baronets - suppose that not more than a Single Bishop were to be found who after years upon years employed in elaborate contrivance, had succeeded in conveying into his own pocket, or that of a near and dear Relative a quantity of Mammon the thousandth part of which if thus in an unguarded moment misconveyed by mere manual dexterity would suffice to consign to the Gallows a starving but unpriviledged Depredator say, if to any such practice, any the slightest corrective were to be applied, what w d be the consequences? The whole fabric of the Church would it not fall to pieces the whole fabric of the Church and with it and with it that of the state? That whole fabrick which for such purposes and by such means has been constituted what it is?

Answer Earl of Liverpool. Answer Lord Viscount Sidmouth. Answer Lord Baron Grenville. Nay, good Lord Grenville, shrink not from the question: for it places you in the best of Company. This scene of harrow did it not visit you in one of your waking dreams? Did it not disturb your Reason? did it not frighten you from the professed commission? Alas! where was your Memory 2? Where was your faith 1? {Even in a case like this} Could you not trust the noble Earl not even in a case like this? Could you not trust the noble Viscount? Think you - now that dreams are over - think you that in such hands so much as a single hair of the head of the dear and Holy Mother would ever be suffered to be touched? Shew, if it be possible, that corruption, that mischief, that wickedness, which, it being established we are not prepared mid [...?] to defend!
Similar Items
  • Title: [1819 Mar. 27 To Erskine 1 o]
    Description: 1819 Mar. 27

    To Erskine

    1 o

    Lett. IX Whigs self-condemned antireformists

    Earl Greys change

    1

    “The time is come” (says M r Place +) The time is come when it is more than ever the duty of every man to adopt the recommendation of M r Grey, now Earl Grey, made by him in 1794 – when in his place in the House of Commons, he said, This House will never

    Now if, speaking as Counsel for Your Lordships Noble friend speaking as Counsel for Your Noble friend, Your Lordship should be pleased to say that his Lordship is ready to say, in the “high character of his eloquence – that he never did say so and that he always did say so – that when he said as much, he did not mean as much that he sees the matter at present in the same light and in the opposite light – that he is the same man as ever, being like Your Lordship’s noble [*]“self devoted as much as ever to a Reform in Parliament – if such be the account given by your[?] Your Lordship of “the highest sense of honour” of this Colleague of your Lordship this Noble leader and Defender of the Whigs – whatever contradiction you may receive from the rough[?] pen of M r Place, you shall receive none from mine.

    The immutability of his changeableness is known to every body: but the reason of it – any thing like the shadow of an attempt to produce a reason – are yet to come.

    {And to see that one Whig is to see all.}

    + Reply p 31

    [*] p. 14
  • Title: [1819 July 9 To Erskine ult]
    Description: 1819 July 9

    To Erskine

    ult o

    Lett. 7. Whigs AntiReformists

    §.2. 1. Desire impossible

    1

    This Volunteer association – this Convention which was the head and fruit of it – this approved and irreproachable bond of union, peace, good will good morals and good government which had continued such during an uninterrupted course of no fewer than five years – wherefore was he this Earl this seat-holder /was he/ so anxious, so determined, and even by such methods, to annihilate it? In the determination by which he is thus designated, behold the answer /cause/. Must it be particularized? is it not already sufficiently manifest /visible/? But if any such there be, there is surely a case in which if from the indication of the cause any thing can be done, it must be made so plain that he who runs may read it: and of those whose situation forced them to run past it, how few are they, who during the run would not rather fall flat and prostrate {to the ground} rather than not keep their eyes closed against it as they passed.

    Yes My Lord, in the eyes of that seat-holding Member of the House of Lords – of that Member of the House of Lords called the House of Lords who to one seat in that House of Lords added two seats in that other House of Lords called the House of Commons, the value of the mass of private and particular interest so composed was so much greater than that of his share in the universal interest, that treachery such as has been seen was not too great a price to pay for the difference between the two values

    Such, by the report of his panegyrist was the Earl of Charlemont: and not to speak of other senses /meanings/ in every sense that has any bearing upon this subject, among the best of your noble army of Whigs where will you find my Lord, than this Earl of Charlemont? In one sense the first, in another sense he was the last of the Whigs of Ireland. “Whiggism” says M r Wakefield (Ireland II. 319) is a subject (now A o 1812) never agitated in the course of a canvas: it expired with the late Lord Charlemont.
  • Title: [1819 May 15 Disfranchising]
    Description: 1819 May 15

    Disfranchising

    Disfranchising

    This no precedent for efficient reform.

    7

    Anti Reformist. Mighty fine, mighty fine indeed! Sir, have you done?

    Reformist. Yes Sir, for the present.

    Anti-Reformist. Very well, Sir: and now you shall have your answer: once for all you shall have it, and all at once

    there: for you, from Lord Erskine

    there’s for you from Earl Grey, it was not for nothing /for no purpose/ that he spoke and sent to the Morning Chronicle his Fox-[…?] speech at Newcastle

    ………… “ theres for you from Lord John Russell: who has no very strong objection to government by and for and by the people on the continent, so long as it does not cross the water and stand in the way of Whig government, of government by a confederacy /coalition/ of Monarchy and Aristocracy at home[?].

    there’s for you from the Quarterly

    1 In the able /trusty[?]/ and well-written letter of Lord John Russel

    2 Lord Holland. How great the misfortune that such abilities /talents/ should be so ill applied. But such is /misapplication is among/ the unchangeable fruits of high opulence grafted on high birth and high rank, and the indefatigable flattery which so surely follows the /addresses itself to the/ track of the car on which such a combination of the instruments of public mischief is seated!