date

1818 March 29 Parl. Ref. Bill
1818 March 29

Parl. Ref. Bill

Reasons

II. Electors Who

7

7

Deplorable indeed would be the inconsistency, if in the eyes of any parliamentary man whose strength is in his eloquence, the idea of a reading people - not to speak of aversion - should be an object even of indifference.

On what ground could he place /build/ his objection?

1. Is it that in this case intellectual aptitude is an object of indifference?

2. Is it that by these means of appropriate information which nothing but the faculty of reading can lay open to him the degree /question/ of appropriate aptitude which he is capable of acquiring is lessened?

3 Whatsoever may be the impressiveness of his eloquence, is it in the House that, as matters stand at present he can entertain any so much as the faintest hope of making any such impression as he would wish?

4 Though to the House in form, is it not to the people - to the people alone in design and hoped for effect that what on any subject on the present is ever said by him is addressed?

5 Except by speeches spoken or said to be spoken by him in the House or if not else by books and pamphlets written by him, has he any means of conveying /communicating/ to the great body of the people on /in relation to/ this or any other subject his opinions or his wishes his wishes his opinions or his arguments /reasons/?

6. The extent of the communications which in this way it may thus be his desire to make is it not diminished by every diminution, encreased by every encrease, in the number of the persons capable of reading what it has been thought good by him to speak or write?
Similar Items
  • Title: [1819 May 23 Defence of Ballot]
    Description: 1819 May 23

    Defence of Ballot

    Under Ballot no secresy

    Argument

    1

    What /That which/ his object makes it necessary for /to/ him /requires him/ to prove is 1 that men in general do not care /not/ a straw about their interest – do not care /not/ a straw what hurt they do to it – do /care/ not care a straw whether they are ruined or no and that for the credit of being thought to have ruined themselves they are generally speaking ready to do so. 2. that what every man must upon a moments reflection see that it is utterly impossible he should know or so much as give a rational guess at, every man generally speaking will believe. This /such[?]/ is what, finding /seeing/ that nothing is to be done without it, he scruples not to charge himself with To keep man from seeing the absolute untenantibility[?] of these notions on any ground of reason his expedient is –and it is the only one which the nature of his case left to him – his recourse /expedient/ is by which he is asserting over and over again the very thing in dispute, to raise and keep up a cloud of dust, composed of words upon words, that so peradventure the discernment /eyes/ /attention/ of his readers should be drawn off and prevented from attaching /fixing/ itself to /upon/ the true points.

    In the execution of this plan so successful has he been this supposing this eloquence to have been spoken spoken for example in the House of Commons or at a London Tavern or Crown and Anchor great room, it may be difficult to say by whom by what proportion of the hearers the torrent of it might have been effectually resisted Unfortunately for its /his/ purpose the only theatre in which an opportunity could be found at pleasure for displaying it was a theatre /an imaginary one/ in which nothing is heard but every thing read and read at leisure: and thus it is that it remains exposed /subject/ to exposure and will remain so at all times /to the end/ so continue. Of the difference in this respect between what is to be heard only and what may be read, of the incomparable advantage given to deception and every deceiver by the fugitive mode of communication in comparison of the everlasting one, no man can be more truly sensible: hence the pains[?] we shall see him taking to render the act of reading an object of great[?] aversion and disgust, and the deep game he is content to play for the chance of rendering it so
  • Title: [1818 March 28 Parl. Ref. Bill]
    Description: 1818 March 28

    Parl. Ref. Bill

    Reasons

    III Electors Who

    Reading Qualification

    Reasons

    4

    4

    But on this as on most political questions, certainties not being within his grasp, man is reduced /subjected/ to the necessity of acting upon probabilities: upon ground of no firmer texture. How /And/ so it is that when for securing the attainment and possession of the great and good government all the means of security that are at the time in question within reach have actually been provided, still, so long as any ulterior ones[?] can be indicated which though not at present /as yet/ within reach afford a pretence of being by appropriate exertions sooner or later brought within reach, still so long as any hope of this hand[?], precedence the undeniable dictates /[...?]/ of precedence, press /urge/ with considerable force the necessity of calling forth their exertions.

    Now as to the existence of the advantages which in this respect a man who possesses the faculty or reading possesses over him who is not in possession of that important faculty - of the existence or of the vast magnitude of these advantages surely no reasonable doubt can ever be entertained {by any man}. A derived judgment, yes: but that sort of judgment, makeshift as it is, be allowed to suffice, suffice without the addition of a self-formed one.. Still in respect of the formation though it be of nothing better than a derived judgment how prodigious is the advantage which the reading man has over him who is unable to read! Within the reach of the reading man lie the very best means of information which the whole [...?] affords: within the reach of the non-reading man lie no other sources of information than what the conversation of a set of men whose means of information are /will for the most part/ as to all matters of detail not much more correct or ample than his own.

    That which by such means may have been placed within his reach is information of the general character /reputation/ possessed already in relation to the several points of appropriate aptitude, by the respective Candidates. That which by these same means can not be placed within his reach is after the Candidate of desire has borne his part in the management of the public business, the propriety /aptitude/, absolute and comparative, of the part acted for him in relation to the several particular questions that have come under his cognizance. /[...?] measures in relation to which he has had to operate./
  • Title: [22 Dec r 1809 Parl. y Reform]
    Description: 22 Dec r 1809

    Parl. y Reform

    Members of the French Parliament's team[?] made [...?] interest of their purchase money? See Adam Smith.

    It is not I that have lifted up the veil: man[?] is neither the moral nor the dement[?]. Over and over again the fact has been held up to view in pamphlets and in speeches: pamphlets read, speeches heard by his friends, and no /nothing in the shape of/ reply ever attempted, for this plain reason because any thing in the shape of a reply is absolutely /utterly/ impossible.