1818 Oct. 28

Parl. Reform Bill

Reasons

'.2. Electors Who

Universality

III Females

7

2

Against all /the/ claim of females to the exercise of monarchical power how many and how strong the reasons none of which have any application to the exercise of this remote and almost imperceptible fraction!

What a contrast between the vigour belonging to the public and political and the weakness belonging /inherent/ in the private and sexual character!

Whatever be her condition in respect of marriage - maiden wife or widow how prodigious a surface does not a female monarch present to the shafts of ridicule.

1. If a virgin, strong as so that character the /her/ chaste bashfulness of her Majesty her aversion will of course be to a connection with the other sex, by most powerful her own predominant her ever predominant affection - her love for her dear subjects /people/ she will be forced to overcome it. The important choice by whom then shall it be made? By her Privy Council? by her Cabinet Council? by any one but herself? If so, in respect of this most important of all choices /functions/ she would be inferior in felicity and power /in power and means of felicity be inferior/ to the meanest of her subjects. Well then by her own royal self must the choice be made? Now then sounds the trumpet of invitation[?] all over Europe. Her Majesty is in want of a husband. /Wanted by and for her Majesty, a male partner to her bed./ Not to speak of subject for little less unnatural than union with another species would be confusion of monarchical with subject blood. Not to speak of subjects in flock a crowd /an army/ of wooers from all the /every/ Courts in Europe. The ceremony of the handkerchief is now reversed: male the head at which the implement is tossed: female and maiden the hand by which it is tossed.

[Marginal note:] The counterpart of Mahometanism is acted by Christianity.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1818 Nov r 25 Parl Reform Bill]
    Description: 1818 Nov r 25

    Parl Reform Bill

    Reasons

    '.1. Seats and Districts

    '.2. Electors Who

    3

    Question 7. Between the interests of the whole male /female/ sex on the one part and the whole of the female sex on the other part is there that /does there exist a/ entire connection such, that by the male sex no injury could be done to the interest of the /aggregate of the/ female sex, without a real injury done to that of the male?

    Answer. Such, as it seems, is the /a/ supposition generally entertained. Such at least is the only supposition by which the exclusion in question can be justified, unless it be supposed, that though by the exclusion an injury to a certain amount is done /produced/, yet the amount is not such as that the exclusion /prevention/ of it should be a good sufficient to compensate for the additional evil which would be produced in the shape of expense, vexation and delay, as above.

    Upon experience and examination, should it ever appear /be established/ that an adequately strong conviction of interests has not place, and that for want of it, more evil is produced by injury done by the exclusion to the interests of the female sex than is [...?] for by the exclusion of the mass of Election evil abovementioned, the propensity of removing /abolishing/ this exclusion, and giving /according/ admission to the votes of females will have been established.

    If in any other shape than as above, inconvenience[?] be really by the nature of the case, attached to admission given to the votes of females, it rests with him in whose opinion such additional inconvenience has existence /place/ to [...?] it and bring it distinctly to view.
  • Title: [1818 Jan 3 Not Paul III. Doctrine]
    Description: 1818 Jan 3

    Not Paul

    III. Doctrine

    Ch. Asceticism

    ยง. 2. Females slighted

    Upon a closer inspection it will be seen that from the eccentric propensity the

    influence of the female sex has more to gain than to lose.

    Rival compared with rival much more formidable to the wedded female is a person of

    her own sex than any person of the opposite sex can ever be. The space in the field

    of life to which the eccentric propensity commonly applies itself is extremely

    limited /narrow/. In the days of imperial Rome, when all matters of this sort were

    settled by established custom, and where a seraglio /harem/ of the male sex formed an

    ordinary part of the establishment of a man of rank and opulence, no sooner had a

    member of such a fraternity /an establishment/ passed his twentieth year that he

    passed into a particular class distinguished by a special appellative exoletus superannuated he was put upon the superannuated list.

    Thus ephemeral were the attractions of the male in the eyes of the male: whereas in

    these same eyes the duration of those of the female has as every one knows no bounds.

    It is in the place of the venal female only and not in the place of her of whose

    charms possession is not to be obtained on any other terms than those of a union made

    permanent by law that those of the male venal or not venal were ever seen to

    occupy.
  • Title: [1822 May 13 Q. Does not the consideration]
    Description: 1822 May 13

    Q. Does not the consideration derived from custom present a

    sufficient reason for the exclusion here in question

    A. Certainly not: for the times in which custom had its commencement

    were times of barbarian immaturity, inferior to the present in all points bearing

    relation to government. Forms of Governments in general, and the feudal Government

    /form/ in particular had their origin in war and conquest In war necessity gave the

    command of all to a single chief; in peace, which in those days was never free from

    apprehensions of war, habit and providence /prudence/ concurred in keeping it in the

    same hands. The female sex at all ages less fit for war than the male, is during the

    time of fertility rendered in a more particular degree unfit by the weaknesses

    attached to gestation and parturition and lactation.

    When monarchical despotism received for the first time its mitigation

    from a sort of humble and servile democracy operating by delegation, it was because

    the continually experienced impossibility of extracting money time enough from

    unwilling contributors drove them into the practice of trying to extract it from

    willing ones, who thereupon received /were raised/ a certain degree of importance,

    and in return for money to receive a certain degree of effective power disguised

    under the appearance of humble influence. These male slaves, heads of the several

    families possessed in small measure /quantity/ /degree/ of appropriate aptitude,

    their female slaves, their female relatives, none. To the males of the /each/ family

    the fatigue and perils of journeys to and from the seat of husbandry and traffic to

    the seat of power were endurable, to the females not. /unendurable./ From an /a

    delegated/ assembly composed of males and females promiscuously nothing but confusion

    and ridicule could have ensued. Thus it was that political power in all its forms and

    degrees came to be engrossed by the males.