date

1818 July 5 Parl. Ref. Bill
1818 July 5

Parl. Ref. Bill

Reasons

II. Electors Who

Universality

People after them rulers

2

34

Now in the breast of the democracy, this cardinal element (cardinal virtue it used to be called) is {always} at its maximum: in the breast of /an/ a Monarchy at its minimum: in the breast of an aristocracy in a quantity growing less and less as the aristocracy approaches nearer and nearer to the condition of a Monarchy. The particular interests of the Monarchist and of the Aristocrat, are in direct opposition to the universal interest: what is the consequence? that of the other two elements viz appropriate intellectual aptitude and appropriate active talent whatsoever portions are possessed by these two adversaries /opponents/ are sure to be employed - every occasion in which the opposition of interests has place, and it has place on almost every occasion - in support of the interests thus adverse to that of the people: to be thus employed, and thereby to be employed in giving continually encreased facility and extension to the sacrifice made of the more extended to the less extended interests.

But in this respect as it was in the beginning, so it is now, and shall /will continue to/ be to the end. Man must be transformed into a being totally different from what he is before any change in this particular can take /have/ place.
Similar Items
  • Title: [13 Jan y 1817 Necessity Cat]
    Description: 13 Jan y 1817

    Necessity Cat

    II. Application

    §.2. Constitution origin

    4

    1

    §.2. British Constitution - what it was or its origin

    Y.M.

    Q.1. The British Constitution is what is in reality or at least in appearance a mixt Monarchy: a Monarchy with a mixture of democracy and Aristocracy in it. But now if, to proceed /in continuation of our enquiry/, I am to ask you in /by/ what arrangements in it that degree of admiration with which you acknowledge yourself to contemplate is produced, you will tell me, perhaps, that the question has been already answered? and that it is by that portion /part/ of the mixture which consists in democracy that the whole stock of this sentiment of yours is engrossed.

    A. I can not do otherwise. {For} when on the subject /in relation/ of as to appropriate probity, we found that in a Monarchy it is at its minimum, in an aristocracy in a ratio decreasing as it approaches to a Monarchy encreasing as it approaches to a democracy in a democracy at its maximum: that as to intellectual aptitude and active talent this element depended for their utility on the rectitude of the direction in which these forces act: that in a Monarchy this rectitude was at its minimum, in an Aristocracy in a ratio decreasing as it approaches to a Monarchy, encreasing as it approaches to a democracy: that in the article of quantity, the quantity of those endowments reasonably expectable in a Monarchy is less than /inferior to what it is/ in an Aristocracy, in a still greater degree inferior to what it is in a democracy: and that neither in a Monarchy nor in an Aristocracy but in a democracy alone is it reasonably /natural/ to be expected that it should be continually on the encrease.
  • Title: [[lxxxiv. 21] 1821 Decr. 5 Codification]
    Description: [lxxxiv. 21]

    1821 Decr. 5

    Codification Proposal

    penult

    ?.5. Draughtsman single

    Appendix

    II Aristocrats interest

    7 Decr. Add Relation between Monarch and Aristocrats interest.

    II. Aristocracy © Member of an Aristocracy.

    Aristocracy © pure Aristocracy without a Monarch over it, belongs not to the present occasion. It is confined to the Aristocratical Cantons of Switzerland: governments which can not be charged with professing liberal ideas.

    In the breast /situation/ of an Aristocracy the general description of sinister interest is the same as in that of a Monarchy

    In so far as /in any community there exists/ a distinguishable body of men has place distinguished from the rest by a peculiarly large proportion of the general mass of the objects of general desire in any shape, a corresponding aristocratical body or aristocracy has place Of aristocracies in one and the same community there are accordingly or may be á³á   á³á different sorts.

    Aristocracy more or less lasting constituted by operative power belonging to the legislative power /branch/, or derived by means of Election, real or pretended, from the body of the people

    1. Aristocracy constituted by official power belonging to the executive branch © aristocracy of power

    3. Aristocracy constituted by factitious dignity aristocracy of title

    4. Aristocracy constituted by present opulence © aristocracy of wealth

    5. Aristocracy constituted by power dignity or opulence of a man's ancestor © aristocracy of birth or ancestry: aristocracy of landed opulence: do of monied opulence.

    6. Aristocracy constituted by official power, factitious dignity, present wealth /opulence/ and hereditary wealth /opulence/ in the hands of the Clergy.

    7. Aristocracy constituted by the influence of talent applied to /employed in the/ political field of government

    In all these several shapes any or all of them the matter of aristocracy may be lodged and united in the hands of one and the same individual

    1. In respect of power it is the interest of the aristocrat and of the aristocracy to have /that his share/ as large a share of /in/ that of the Monarch as possible: and that in respect of /correspondency with/ that share the subjection of the people be as compleat and as extensive as possible

    2. In respect of money, it is the interest of the aristocrat and of the aristocracy to have as large a share of that portion which is taken out of the hands of the producers /body of the people/ as possible: as likewise as large a share as possible of the residuum left by the Monarch in the hands of the people

    3. In respect of factitious dignity it is the interest of each aristocrat to have to himself as large a portion of it as possible. At the same time it is his interest that the number of all those of the same class or /rank and of those/ of a higher rank be as small as possible: but that the share /lot/ possessed by those of a rank inferior to his own, be as large /high/ as possible, so also the number of those who have situation in that same inferior rank.
  • Title: [1819 Sept. 22 Parl. Reform Bill]
    Description: 1819 Sept. 22

    Parl. Reform Bill

    Reasons ult o

    §.2 Electors Who

    Beginning

    4

    For those reasons, every degree of extension given to the proportionable number of the Members among whom the powers of government have been distributed has been an improvement: the sum of the universal happiness has been augmented by it.

    The most simple form of government – meaning permanent government (a) is pure Monarchy: synonymous to which is absolute despotism. It requires less labour and less good fortune is /has been/ requisite to set it up and maintain it Taking the whole population of the earth together

    The first improvement upon this form is the aristo{cratical} Monarchical tempered by /with/ the aristocratical for a check to it. The form is here better and better to the proportional number of the persons who share in it and in the enjoyment attached to it is greater and greater: that is in proportion as it approaches nearer to the democratical

    The near[?] improvement is that which has place where the office of Monarch has no place /is left out/, and the whole of the power remains in the hands of an Aristocracy.

    Here then we have three distinguishable forms of government. 1. Pure Monarchy. 2. Pure Aristocracy. 3. Mixture of Monarchy and Aristocracy.

    As to the comparative goodness of the three the only circumstances by which any doubt or difference or doubt can be produced are these. 1. In the case of a pure Monarchy, though in general the condition of the people is worse than under an aristocracy, yet sometimes from /in/ the extraordinary virtues sometimes from the weaknesses of the Monarch it may happen to their misery to find more or less of relief: whereas under an aristocracy there is never any such relief: it has no virtue: it has no weaknesses: its conduct is at all times determined by a full comprehension of, and a well considered inflexible and exclusive regard for its own separate and sinister interest.