1
results found in
35 ms
Page 1
of 1
7 Oct. 1809
Parl y. Reform. P t. I. Necessity. Chapters
and Sections
Ch. 13. King’s unfitness or Evil consequences of the Kings being his own Minister
See Ch. 4.
§.1. Evil consequences enumerated.
§.2: Consequence 1. Misrule, viz. by the King
§.3.2. Preference given to unfit subordinates.
§.4-3. Encroachment continually encreasing.
§.5.-4. Habits of insincerity produced in Ministers.
{ §.6. King’s unfitness for power maintained by Burke. Here, or in Ch. 4? or in Ch.
14? }
Ch. 14. King’s dependence on the people how far necessary
§ 1. Propriety of the King’s dependence in point of theory.
§ 2. Objection answered inconsistency of such dependence with the ballance of power.
(Reference to a dissertation in the Appendix.)
§.3. Actual dependence of the King antecedently to the present reign. Historical
sketch
§.4. Hanover and Hampshire The dependence broken through in the case of Hanover.
§.5. The propriety of the King’s dependence maintained by Burke Post[?] off to Ch.
15.
§.6. Future prospects necessity of this dependence indicated by the state of the
Royal Family.
Ch. 15
poste[?] 16[?] Marginals
Ch. 16. The King will be despotic, unless the House of Commons be thus dependent on
the people.
§.1. The King’s sinister interest will prevail unless controuled
§.2. Sole adequate controul the power of the people
§.3. Peculiar excellence of the mode in which this controul is exercised according to
the English constitution.
§.4. The controul of the people is nullified, in so far as their delegates are
dependent on the King.
§.5. The dependence of the House of Commons on the King is compleat on all ordinary
occasions.
§.6. Its dependence on the people is the sole true remedy.
§.7. Inefficacy of all other remedies – spirit of the people – press - &c.
Ch. 17.* Occasional interposition on the part of the people
is inadequate.
§.1.
§.2.
§.3. Burke’s intimation of its adequacy examined.
§.4. Tumultuous petitioning Act – check applied by it to
such interposition.
Ch. 19. Necessity of parl y reform to the promotion of unnecessary
wars.
§.1. In theory Polyarchy is more favourable than monarchy to peace.
§.2. Facilities the King has for plunging the people into war.
§.3. In practice polyarchy has been more pacific than monarchy.
§.4. Wars produced or endeavoured at by sinister interest in this reign.
Ch. 18 No marginals Recapitulatory conclusion – Despotism is at
hand.
§.1. Abject dependence of the House of Commons.
§.2. Abject dependence of the Clergy and the Lawyers
§.3. All interruptions to the despotism are precarious and inadequate.
§.4. Recapitulation.
Ch. 15. Unfitness of the King for exercising power in detail – and the necessity of
his dependence on the people through the medium of their delegates, contended for by
Burke
§.1. Burke’s opinions to what purpose brought to view
§.2. His opinions as to the power of the King
§.3 – as to the powers of the people
§.4 – as to the power of the Electors over their delegates.
Ch. 20. Mischief of Idol-worship in the person of the King viz. as obstructing Parl
Reform
§.1.
29 Dec r 1809
Ch. 17 The occasional prevalence of Oppositions[?] is no efficient check to the
King’s despotism.
§.1. Dependence on a party, though in opposition, is dependence on the King.
§.2. Changes in administration prevent not despotism, only cause it to change hands.
§.3.
Similar Items
-
Title: [7 Oct. 1809 Parl y. Reform. P t. 1]Description: 7 Oct. 1809 Parl y. Reform. P t. 1. Necessity – Chapters and Sections Ch. 1. Plan of this work §.1. Objects of this work §.2. Radical grievance Dependence of the House of Commons on the King. Nov. 1816 This is not the evil itself but its cause. §.3. Pleas in belief of the Dependence stated. Ch. 2. Kings separate interest – general view of it. §.1. K. gs separate interest why held up to view §.2. K. gs separate interest – shapes in which it acts. Ch.3. King’s interest as to to Power – what power he ought to have. §.1. Power as to 1 measures – 2. – men. §.2. What power the King ought to have as to each. Ch. 4. King’s interest as to power continued – What power he ought not to have. (See Ch 13.) §.1. Powers not properly exercisable by the King §.2. Pitt y r[?] – his notions accorded with the above. Here or further on? §.3. No medium between the Kings absolute power and the above limitations. Note on continuing[?] Kings here or elsewhere? Ch.4. continued. §.4. King’s inviolability and indismissibility depend upon his impotence. Ch. 5. Kings interest as to power continued – his sinister interest. as to d o. §. 1 King’s sinister interest as to 1. Measures §. 2. King’s sinister interest as to 2. patronage Marginals have only §.6 Ch. 6. King’s interest as to power continued. his sinister interest as to sources of power. §.1. King’s sinister interest as to war. §.2. – as to Colonies and dependencies in general §.3. – as to Penal Colonies §.4. – as to ill-governed home-possessions. §.5. Limits to Kings power of patronage Ch. 7. King’s interest as to 2. Money §.1. Money how far the object of his public, how far of his sinister interest. §.2. Admiralty Droits. §.3. Greenwax. §.4. Exemption from War-Taxes. Ch. 8. King’s interest as to 3. Ease. §.1. Ease, how far the object of his public, how far of his sinister, interest. §.2. Ch. 9. King’s interest as to 4. Reputation. §.1. King’s reputation, what publicly useful, what sinister. §.2. Mischief of undue reputation in the Kings case §.3. Kings interest in the means of reputation Ch. 10. Kings interest as to 5. Vengeance. §.1 Sinister how much, i.e What fit, what unfit. §.2. Ch. 11. Kings sinister interests – their mutual subservience. Ch. 12. Sinister interest of the King’s subordinates. §.1. Shapes in which the sinister interests of the Kings subordinates act. §.2. Natural confederacy among the several subordinate possessors of sinister interest. §.3. Sinister interests as to war exemplified. {{ Topics of the Chapters Stated. I. Radical grievance dependence of Commons on King N.B. This dependence /The mischief/ depends on the existence of a separate interest on King’s part. Insert here from Plan – Explanations – Mischief of Commons dependence Ch. 1. II. Kings sep. interest, its different branches – Ch. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 10. 11. thence unfitness as to probity III. D o of this subordinate. Ch.12. IV. King’s unfitness as to intelligence. Ch. 13. V. Necessity of an adequate check to King’s power, governed by his separate interest. Only such check, his dependence on the people, thro’ their representatives. Ch. 14. VI. Burke’s opinion assuring Kings unfitness, and thence the necessity of his constant dependence on the people. Ch. 15 VII. Unless the king be thus constantly dependent, his power will encrease to despotism and his sinister interest govern without controul. Ch. 16 VIII. Inadequacy of other checks upon the King’s absolute power. Ch. 17. } IX. Particular necessity of King’s constant dependence to the prevention of unnecessary wars. Ch. 19. { King can not be dependent on people but in so far as their representatives are Ch. Taking representatives out of dependence on King and rendering them in part[?] dependent as formerly on their property in part independent of every body the main object of Parliam. Reform. }} { X. King would naturally[?] be in a state of adequate dependence on people, of representatives, instead of being either independent or dependent on people, were not dependent on King. XI. Necessity of taking them out of the improper dependence and placing them under the proper one. XII. For this purpose intelligendum how /by what means[?]/ the dependence is established. } { XIII. Corruption and bribery by and to whomsoever applied are no otherwise productive of considerable mischief, than in as far as they are contributory to this anticonstitutional dependence. } XIV. By the means necessary to do away the greatly mischievous corruption, the other modes will be done away. XV. The arrangements necessary to place the dependence of Members on the proper footing as above may be so ordered as to be productive of divers collateral and subordinate and collateral good effects.
-
Title: [8 Oct 1809 Parl. Reform Necessity]Description: 8 Oct 1809 Parl. Reform Necessity Burke on present Discontents – References to Passages in. 1 General proscription of official men by Bute. p.21. 2. Discussion carefully fomented. p.32 3 King virtually absolute. + p32 4 Grant of D. of Portland’s Estate. + p33. 5. Sandwich persuaded to peach Wilkes. p34 6 Repts.[?] Midx. George’s Fields. Opening of the Parl t p35. 7 Confidence exclusively given to subordinates. 8 Subordinates draw majorities from their superiors in Parl t. p.36. 9. Subordinates maintain office in spite of their superiors – Superiors sacrificed to them. p37 {10 K.1 King’s men or friends – Double Cabinet. p.37} 11 Written A o 1768 p38 {12 K2 Blame laid not on Brute but on the system – i.e. the King. p39} 13 K3 Favoritism the Grand Mischief. p40 Mischiefs 14. K.4 Choice of Ministers in the King: a grievance. p41 { Mischiefs 15. K.5. King sh d have no choice of men or measures. p41} 16 Mischief of all sorts & degrees may be done by ministers without exposing them to punishment. p.42 { Popular[?] waste[?] 17 K.6 King’s personal power sho d be = 0. p.43} {18 P. People should have a virtual negative to nomination to offices as King has to laws. p.44} {19 K7 Insulated[?] men should not be suffered in office because dependent on the King. p46.} { Mischief 20 K8 Mischievous that the King sh d appoint the Ministers p.47.} { Dependence 21 P2 Interposition of substantial Yeomanry called for. p.50} 22 Anxious incapacity of King’s friends make them afraid of just war. p52. { 23 P3 Good men hope better things from temporary confusion than from established servitude. p.57} 24 G.3. All the circumstances of the reign melancholy proofs of bad governm t. p.62 25. G.3.2 King takes an interest in giving uneasiness to his people. p.63 26 G.3.3 Subordinates dear to King as they are odious to the people. p.64 { Dependence 27 P.4 Per Burke. H. of Commons letter democratical than dependent. p67 } { 28 P.5. H. of Commons sh d h a controul, not upon but for, the people. p.68} { Dependence 29 P.6 | 2 Worst corruption in the H. of Commons independence as ag t the people. p69} 30 P Ro 1. Per Burke: principle of Parl t totally corrupted, Lets end defeated. p69 31 R Ro 2 Septennial Parliaments necessitated by Election disorders. p.70 See 40. p.95 32 Lords Impeachm t in danger of being lost. p.71. 33 Executive functions being participated in by H. of C. its use as a check is lost. p71 Dependence 34. P.7 | 1 H. of Commons no controul, useless in so far as controuled by their Representatives. p80. 35. Subject of incapacities in an arbitrary state. p81 36 Judge-made law reprobated. p81 { Dependence 37 R C H H. of Commons must quite[?] be always dependent either on Court or people. p.85} 38 King’s debt – civil list debt – no debt of the Nation paid by Parliament as[?] p91. 39 Civil list expenditure arbitrary standard substituted to legal. p.92 40 C. P.R. Parl t declared to be the best support of arbitrary power that ever was invented – if things happened – than which more important have now actually happened. p.94 41 P.R. Short Parliaments reprobated – See 31. p.70 p95 42 P.R. Removal of placemen d o. p.95 43 P.R. Influence Influence by place defended. p.39. { Cas. Interp 44 P.8 Casual interposition of y e people recommended. p100} 45 C Distempers of Monarchy, the mischief in the last century – in this the distemper of Parl. t p.100 46 P 9 Schemes for everything the controul of Electors upon Representatives. p.100 Mischief dependence 47 Impotent administration […?] to Kings interest – not fit for y e governm t. p.101 48 C Dependence of Commons abject. p.101 49 C P.9 Dependence on the people, tho’ awful honourable. p.102 { Mischief 50 K.10 King pretending to have any power incompatible with public peace & good gov t. p.103} { 51 P.10 Exhortation to Electors to contribute by their Votes to the extirpation of King’s men. p.104} 52 Open declaration of Bute ag t political connection. p.105 In 55. p.112 53 Fallacy – never may barbarism plus sages guiles[?] sages. p108 54 Party eulogistic definition of. p110 55 Not measures but men supported – The contrary reprobated. See 52. p.105. p112. Mischief dependence 56 P.11 Exhortation to resist the will of the King p117 Dependence 57 P.R. Exhortation to restore the constitution to original principles, & to the people to keep the House dependent on themselves. p117 Dependence 58 K.11 Choice of the people ought to determine King’s choice of Ministers. 118. 59 K 12 P.12 No alternative between Kings dependence on the people and despotism. p118.
-
Title: [31 Aug 1809 Parl y Ref m Ch. Necessity]Description: 31 Aug 1809 Parl y Ref m Ch. Necessity Original Beginning. 1 §.5. K gs sep. interest. 1. Money 23. 24. 25. §.8. King’s separate interest 3. ease. §.9. King’s separate interest 4. vengeance §.10. Kings separate interest. 5. reputation. {Part 1 Ch. 1 Objects of this work […?] and Means of Reform Necessity & mode of reform[?] replacing the House of Commons in a state of dependence on the people Ch.2. The King’s separate interest – shapes in which it acts Ch.3. The Necessary prevalence[?] of which the conduct of the K.[?] is dependent on his will Ch.4. Sole remedy replacing the House in its dependence on the people } B.I. Necessity. Sect. s continued { 6 §.19. Elogiums on the Kings mischievous.} B.III. Influence 1 2 §.20. Tests, an instrument of corrupt dependence. III. Influence 2 1 §.21. Ireland – its abuses of use to despotism. Ch. 5 { B.I. Necessity Sections 12 Sept 1809 § 1 Objects of this work 1 (2. 3. 4. notes:) 5. 6 §.2. General grievance. Dependence of the H. of Commons. 7. 8. 9: 10. 11. 12. §.3 Pleasure[?] forms[?] of the dependence. 13. 14. 15. Duplicative[?] 15. Influence ambiguous, Reference inwards. II §.4. Kings sinister /separate/ interest – its 5 shapes 16. 17 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. {23 24. 25.} (dup. 8. 9.) §.6. Kings sinister /separate/ interest 2. Power. as to 1. Measure §.7.* King’s separate interest 2. power. as to 2. patronage III §.7./10/ Mutual subservience of King’s separate interests. §.8./11 Ministers’ separate interests. IV 1 §.9./12/ King’s and Ministers separate interests prevalent – unless controuled. 2 §.10. People’s controul Britannice[?] – its peculiar excellence. 3 §.11. Sole effectual controul, People’s power thro’ Representatives. 4 §.12. People’s controul mollified by House’s dependence. 5 §.13. House, in dependence compleat. 6 §.14. Sole remedy. House’s dependence 15 V § 15. King’s dependence necessary 17 §.16. Future prospects. 18 §.17. Despotism chained & loosed – Historical Sketch 19 §.18. King’s dependence necessary – Objection – Ballance destroyed.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1