1
results found in
22 ms
Page 1
of 1
21 Sep 1809
K[?] 17 Sep. 1809
Parl y Ref m B. 1. Necessity.
Ch. 20 Elogiums mischievous
3
30 Sep. 1809. Ordo propositus.
§.1. Interest how much dexter, how much sinister as to reputation
§.2. Mischief of the effectual pursuit of his sinister interest in this article.
§.3/4/. Modes by which his sinister inter t in this is pursuable
§.4/3/. Modes by which his dexetr interest in this is pursuable
§.5. Mischief of effectual pursuit of his sinister interest how avoible[?] – not by
punishm t, but by parl y reform.
False tokens of fitness, as[?]
1. Youth and old age
2 Nativity
3. Large family – Wife’s avarice
4. Conjugal fidelity. To know[?] so forbidding?
5 Solanne[?] & Cobbet convicted as for a libel for imputing […?] character to
Hardwick in token of public unfitness.
6. Gossipping & Gratification to preach
7 Blindness[?]
Tokens of unfitness.
1. Misrule – so many instances – nothing done since King’s commission Proof Catholic
business
2. Slave Trade abolition – his opposition
3. Sacrificing Britain & Hanover to himself
4. Propensity to unjust war against Russia thro’ Sweden.
5 Liberty of the people Wilkes &c
6. Freedom of H. of Commons Middlesex election.
7. Fondness for arbitrary power. British America: Spanish America.
8. Hardness of character Keeping people standing &c.
9. Imbecillity – What? what? what?
10. Hatred of Talents. Paley – A. Smith – Archb p. Moore.
11. Exempting himself from War Taxes.
12
Inspectors make […?] in[?] dupes. It is to these alone[?] I address myself with any
prospect of success –
Henceforward any size[?] of […?] should bespeak a man an Ephraim[?] Justius[?].
In regard to each pretence of private goodness, ask is this a reason why he should
govern?
Similar Items
-
Title: [7 Oct. 1809 Parl y. Reform. P t. 1]Description: 7 Oct. 1809 Parl y. Reform. P t. 1. Necessity – Chapters and Sections Ch. 1. Plan of this work §.1. Objects of this work §.2. Radical grievance Dependence of the House of Commons on the King. Nov. 1816 This is not the evil itself but its cause. §.3. Pleas in belief of the Dependence stated. Ch. 2. Kings separate interest – general view of it. §.1. K. gs separate interest why held up to view §.2. K. gs separate interest – shapes in which it acts. Ch.3. King’s interest as to to Power – what power he ought to have. §.1. Power as to 1 measures – 2. – men. §.2. What power the King ought to have as to each. Ch. 4. King’s interest as to power continued – What power he ought not to have. (See Ch 13.) §.1. Powers not properly exercisable by the King §.2. Pitt y r[?] – his notions accorded with the above. Here or further on? §.3. No medium between the Kings absolute power and the above limitations. Note on continuing[?] Kings here or elsewhere? Ch.4. continued. §.4. King’s inviolability and indismissibility depend upon his impotence. Ch. 5. Kings interest as to power continued – his sinister interest. as to d o. §. 1 King’s sinister interest as to 1. Measures §. 2. King’s sinister interest as to 2. patronage Marginals have only §.6 Ch. 6. King’s interest as to power continued. his sinister interest as to sources of power. §.1. King’s sinister interest as to war. §.2. – as to Colonies and dependencies in general §.3. – as to Penal Colonies §.4. – as to ill-governed home-possessions. §.5. Limits to Kings power of patronage Ch. 7. King’s interest as to 2. Money §.1. Money how far the object of his public, how far of his sinister interest. §.2. Admiralty Droits. §.3. Greenwax. §.4. Exemption from War-Taxes. Ch. 8. King’s interest as to 3. Ease. §.1. Ease, how far the object of his public, how far of his sinister, interest. §.2. Ch. 9. King’s interest as to 4. Reputation. §.1. King’s reputation, what publicly useful, what sinister. §.2. Mischief of undue reputation in the Kings case §.3. Kings interest in the means of reputation Ch. 10. Kings interest as to 5. Vengeance. §.1 Sinister how much, i.e What fit, what unfit. §.2. Ch. 11. Kings sinister interests – their mutual subservience. Ch. 12. Sinister interest of the King’s subordinates. §.1. Shapes in which the sinister interests of the Kings subordinates act. §.2. Natural confederacy among the several subordinate possessors of sinister interest. §.3. Sinister interests as to war exemplified. {{ Topics of the Chapters Stated. I. Radical grievance dependence of Commons on King N.B. This dependence /The mischief/ depends on the existence of a separate interest on King’s part. Insert here from Plan – Explanations – Mischief of Commons dependence Ch. 1. II. Kings sep. interest, its different branches – Ch. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 10. 11. thence unfitness as to probity III. D o of this subordinate. Ch.12. IV. King’s unfitness as to intelligence. Ch. 13. V. Necessity of an adequate check to King’s power, governed by his separate interest. Only such check, his dependence on the people, thro’ their representatives. Ch. 14. VI. Burke’s opinion assuring Kings unfitness, and thence the necessity of his constant dependence on the people. Ch. 15 VII. Unless the king be thus constantly dependent, his power will encrease to despotism and his sinister interest govern without controul. Ch. 16 VIII. Inadequacy of other checks upon the King’s absolute power. Ch. 17. } IX. Particular necessity of King’s constant dependence to the prevention of unnecessary wars. Ch. 19. { King can not be dependent on people but in so far as their representatives are Ch. Taking representatives out of dependence on King and rendering them in part[?] dependent as formerly on their property in part independent of every body the main object of Parliam. Reform. }} { X. King would naturally[?] be in a state of adequate dependence on people, of representatives, instead of being either independent or dependent on people, were not dependent on King. XI. Necessity of taking them out of the improper dependence and placing them under the proper one. XII. For this purpose intelligendum how /by what means[?]/ the dependence is established. } { XIII. Corruption and bribery by and to whomsoever applied are no otherwise productive of considerable mischief, than in as far as they are contributory to this anticonstitutional dependence. } XIV. By the means necessary to do away the greatly mischievous corruption, the other modes will be done away. XV. The arrangements necessary to place the dependence of Members on the proper footing as above may be so ordered as to be productive of divers collateral and subordinate and collateral good effects.
-
Title: [16 Sep 1809 K[?] 5 Sep. 1809]Description: 16 Sep 1809 K[?] 5 Sep. 1809 Parl y Ref m Necessity. Ch. Kings dependence necessary 3 20 § 3 Kings dependence […?] Hanover & Hampshire 1. To gratify the King, Hanover and Hampshire under two successive Reigns put upon a par. p5. 2. Had the interests of the people formed an ingredient in their calculations, no such rapprochement would have been made. p.5. 3. The declaration thus made by Fox and Grenville furnishes them by Ord[…?], as little capable of being effected, as the conquering Spanish America for the Junta p.6. 4. Had the King turned over Hanover to one of his sons, the King w d have been none the Poorer, and his son would have been placed in the same condition as the king of Wirtemberg. p.6 3 (a) Note from Dodington. p.6 4 (a) Blessed condition of the people! Under a party the two heads of which have not scrupled to avow that they cared no more for their country than for Hanover! – and that even the party should be a resource!
-
Title: [16[?] Sep 1809 K[?] Sep 1809]Description: 16[?] Sep 1809 K[?] Sep 1809 Parl y Ref m Necessity Kings dependence necessary §.3. Hanover & Hampshire §.4. Burke accordant §.5. Future prospects 2 19 Addenda to Future prospects *2 Prince deemed unfit by King – his most competent Judge. Either he is so, or the King has all along been unfit for judging him. §.3 Hanover & Hampshire §.4. Burke accordant §.5. Future prospects
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1