date

1818 Sept. 29 Parl. Reform Bill
1818 Sept. 29

Parl. Reform Bill

3 o

Reasons

§.2. Electors Who

3

{§.14. Untimeliness of the supposition of such a deficiency of comparative

intellectual aptitude on the part of virtually universal suffrage men is to render

vesting of the choice in the hands of a Monarch or an aristocracy less mischievous,

notwithstanding {their} any deficiency in the articles of probity.}

{VI. Probity, its deficiency in all but actually universal suffrage men.

VII. Consequence of this deficiency constant […?] purposely &[?]

sympathetic[?] to self-regarding interest}

VIII. Sympathy no sufficient counterpoise to self regarding interest Insert or rather

discard?

{ IX. II Intellectual aptitude }
Similar Items
  • Title: [1818 Sept. 29. Parl. Reform Bill]
    Description: 1818 Sept. 29.

    Parl. Reform Bill

    VII or VIII

    Reasons 3 o

    '.2. Electors Who

    Universality

    1. Probity

    17

    But, under /on/ the here proposed system /plan/ of virtually universal suffrage no elector has any possible means of giving effect to this same propensity: he has no possible means of promoting in any case his self-regarding interest separately considered, and to the sacrifice or prejudice of the interest of any other individual or of that of the whole community: he has not any possible means of preventing self regarding interest in any shape other than that of his own share in the aggregate the universal interest.

    37. This then, with a degree of effect or at least of promise proportioned to that of his appropriate intellectual aptitude, is the interest and the only interest which in the exercise of the right in question it will be to his study and endeavour to promote.

    37. Thus then /under/ Monarchy and Aristocracy this predominance of personal /self-regarding/ over universal interest, and the consequently constant sacrifice of the universal to the particular interest, is altogether certain and impreventible: under Representative Democracy, in the situation of Representative, preventible; in the situation of Elector, impossible: that is to say the sacrifice of the universal interest notwithstanding the predominance of the self-regarding /personal/ interest.
  • Title: [1818 Sept. 27 Parl. Reform Bill]
    Description: 1818 Sept. 27

    Parl. Reform Bill

    3 o

    Reasons

    §.2. Electors Who

    2

    I. Probity.

    §.9/ 8/ First element of appropriate aptitude in Electors, probity – what is meant by it its superior importance not

    moral probity – 25, 26

    opposite i.e political unprobity, what. 24

    §.10./ 9/ Political improbity – its effect sacrifice of universal

    to particular interest: this sacrifice under Monarchy and Aristocracy certain: under

    Repreentative Democracy according to the proposed system in the representative body

    preventible in the body of Electors impossible. 29. 30. 31 32. 33.

    34. 35. 36. 37

    By no sympathy can this propensity be stopped.

    {§.10. Effect of this sacrifice on the distribution of money, power and factitious

    dignity – ie. the matter of good in all its shape in the clear forms of government.

    20 21. 22 23.}

    38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46

    II. Intellectuality.

    §.12. Second and last element of appropriate aptitude in the case of Electors,

    intellectual aptitude – sufficiency of the virtually universal suffrage men in

    respect of it. 47. 48 49. 50. 51. See 2

    o

    §.13 – their comparative sufficiency when compared with their above mentioned rivals.

    52.
  • Title: [1818 Sept 29 Parl. Reform Bill]
    Description: 1818 Sept 29

    Parl. Reform Bill

    + IX

    Reasons 3 o

    '.2. Electors Who

    Universality

    II. Intellectuality

    1

    21

    47 Forasmuch as /Seeing then that/ in the scale of appropriate probity representative democracy on the proposed plan of virtually universal suffrage stands alone, neither monarchy nor aristocracy having properly speaking any pretensions to the possession of appropriate aptitude /this endeavour[?]/ in any degree, what remains to be considered is whether in respect of appropriate intellectual aptitude, always with reference /respect/ to the exercise of the power in question, democracy in this shape is in any such degree inferior {in the scale} to these two forms respectively as to render it more for the advantage of the universal interest to lodge in these two authorities respectively, or in both of them together, the faculty of appointing the person who in the assembly in question shall sit and act in the character of the Representative of the people.