1 April 1817

Plan Cat

2 o

Introd

§ Exclusion of Placemen

{ In the country of Cacotopia, ultimate and assigning

/indicating/ principle, minimization of the aggregate of happiness Principal – means

indicating principle Duty and interest dissevering principle

Principal specific application made of this fundamental the Judico teipsum

principle.

Britannia[?] }
Similar Items
  • Title: [1 April 1817 Plan Cat 2 o]
    Description: 1 April 1817

    Plan Cat

    2 o

    Introd

    § Exclusion of Placemen

    3

    Opposite to the duty-and-interest identifying principle – behold in the character of

    the principal means indicating principle /chief subservient

    principle/ the duty and interest dissevering[?] principle.

    Principal special application of the duty and interest dissevering[?] principle the

    Judico-teipsum principle.

    According as it is to Utopia not the Utopia of Sir Thomas More but the new Utopia

    just indicated according as it is to this new Utopia or to Cacotopia that the

    situation of the country in question approximates the maximization or the

    minimization of the aggregate of happiness will be the ultimate end or object to

    which the practice and subordinate principles of the rulers tend. the duty and

    interest identifying or the duty and interest dissevering[?] principle the chief

    instrumental or subservient principle.

    For the test of goodness in a political constitution as between one country and

    another, in the comparative use made of the two opposite and antagonizing principles

    may be seen a test the propriety of which will not easily be disputed.

    In the extent to which application is made of the duty and interest-dissevering[?]

    principle, and in particular in the extent to which application is made of the

    judico-teipsum principle may be seen the principal efficient causes of the misrule

    under which the country labours and the misery in all shapes which is of the number

    of its effects
  • Title: [1 April 1817 Plan Cat Introd]
    Description: 1 April 1817

    Plan Cat

    Introd

    § Exclusion of Placemen

    or

    §. Conclusions

    Duty and Interest { 1. Identifying

    { 2. Opposing

    Judico teipsum[?]

    1

    See[?] comparison[?] of inducing[?] words[?] by men[?]

    Omit in praesente?

    Reader to whom /in whose eyes/ the exercise of the faculty of thought is a pretence,

    and the means of happiness of your fellow creatures upon a large /the largest/ scale

    the worthiest field it can have, think of these things

    1 Maximization of the aggregate of human happiness within the geographical field in

    question the end. Call this the ultimate end assigning /moderating[?]/ principle

    2. In respect /reference/ of men of all classes without exception, but in a more

    particular manner, the class of the ruling few, identification of interest with duty,

    the general description of the means. Call this the duty-and-interest-identifying

    principle.

    To effect this identification is the object and in so far as the endeavour is

    successful the effect of whatsoever is done rightly in the application of the motives

    of good and evil in the character of matter of reward and punishment.

    Of all abusive principles and practices by which the duty and interest-identifying

    principle is violated the most flagrant is that by which a man is made judge in his

    own cause The principle in conformity to which abuse in this shape is established and

    acted upon, call it the Judico-teipsum principle. (a)

    In consequence of these words of which the ordinary matter of dis[…?], lay indeed in

    these words. But in each /which/ of them is not the substance of a victim[?] to be

    found?

    Note (a)

    Judico-teipsum. Be your own Judge a commission given by a

    judicatory of Cardinals to a delinquent[?] Pope The story is in Blackstone
  • Title: [1 April 1817 Plan Cat 2 o Note]
    Description: 1 April 1817

    Plan Cat

    2 o Note?

    Introd

    § Exclusion of Placemen

    1

    Omitt in præsente?

    Note (a)

    In a measure of t’other day, reader behold an exemplification and use of the

    Judico-teipsum principle

    In the section on secrecy of suffrage you have been seeing

    how a sham ballot was prevented, and the practice cast into the gulph of everlasting

    infamy by the well applied foot of M r Brougham. That form of

    imposture being thus spoilt for use, comes instead of it a Committee filled by a

    choice avowedly ministerial – a Committee of finance for the declared purpose of

    making defalcation from the mass waste as practiced in the field /temple/ of official

    emolument, and in particular in that polished corner of it which is occupied by

    Sinecures.

    Of the Committee thus appointed will any and what retrenchment be the fruit? Who can

    tell? as yet, probably not even the contriver of it: on each ensuing day it will

    depend upon the existing circumstances. For the amusement of the public of hopes and

    that even in a specific shape have already been held out: a mark for abolition has

    been set upon this and that and that other office in the character of a sinecure.