date

[129b-448] 16 March 1817 Plan
[129b-448]

16 March 1817

Plan Cat

2 o

Intro

§18. Defence

Inserendum

One supposition indeed there is on which it might be not altogether so easy for the Right Honourable arbiter to afford a compleat acquittal to /acquit/ the Noble Lord. This is that in and by the article what in the case in question is supposed to have been employed in the capacity of an instrument of corruption an addition was made to the quantity of that matter antecedently existing at the disposal of the Servants of the Crown and destined to be applied to the purpose of sinister influence /the sort of influence here in question/. Antecedently to the establishment of the Board of Controul, that any part of the patronage of British India was in the hands of the Crown. At the time in question by the example in question it appears that a part of that patronage viz. one writership was at the command of the Servant of the Crown viz. by means[?] of the Presidency of the Board of Controul. For, one of these Writerships was it seems at the command of those faithful servants ready to be employed in the purchase in question in the purchase of the next presentation to a seat. At that time what may have been, since that time what may be, the number of those articles transferred from the East India Directors and lodged in the hands of the Board of Controul and incidentally or customarily and regularly applied to this convenient and accommodating purpose? This is the article of information, the attainment of which if practicable might, if it were only in the way of gratification to the appetite of curiosity, have its use.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[129a–372] 1 Dec r 1816 Preface]
    Description: [129a–372]

    1 Dec r 1816

    Preface to Parl Ref. Cat or Plan

    Introd

    §.3 Mischief Cause

    adverse interests

    12

    The subject mains[?] either not considered at all not considered in any other character than that of objects of sacrifice

    Omitted

    Influence of will over will influence of House of Commons over the King /[…?]/ and his political servants, {yes} /good/: but influence of the King and his servants over the House of Commons is this good likewise? No: in so far as any such influence has place In other influence, proportioned to which is the sole use of the House of Commons and that fortune[?] in which the sole virtue[?] of that part of the government is concentrated, is counteracted and the effect /power/ of it destroyed. In all those other instances influence may be useful and rightly exercised: in this and those[?] where it is corrupt and can not ever be exercised but with a corruptive and pernicious effect.

    So in regard to patronage, the instrument by which influence is exercised. Even at so late a period as that of M r Foxs East India Bill, where I remember asking is the harm of it. Patronage power of appointing to office in the case of every office it must exist somewhere. At present it is in the Directive of the East India Company: and you see how bad a […?] they have made of it. In general it is in the King out of Parliament: when[?] King as he is is not so great nor so […?] a person as the King /himself/ in Parliament, here the patronage is not to be in /as[?]/ the servants of the Crown who are higher, and we must presume better than the Directors of the East India Company, but even in Parliament itself that highest of all political bodies by which the servants of the Crown in name are the King himself – effect are judged. Yes, answered the friend to whom these observations were addressed a man bred up in the very hotbed of influence Yes: {the} quantity not much greater, very likely: but where it is the influence is divided among 24 hands, and can not by any application made of it have any immediate effect on the course taken by Parliament: but now let it be placed in the hands of the Minister by whom the House of Commons is led, to govern /influence or to speak out/ by means of it the House of Commons, and through the House of Commons the King and the House of Lords. What therefore I saw immediately was that there was much more in the matter of influence than even I had been aware of. But that by the direction that would in that case have been given to the stream of influence any greater mischief would have been produced than that which as it is has taken place, that was matter question and {in} which nothing has ever seemed to call upon me for any inquiry I left to those to whom and to whose competency it belonged.
  • Title: [1818 Sept. 10 Appendix Boroughmongers]
    Description: 1818 Sept. 10

    Appendix

    Boroughmongers

    §.3

    2

    12

    2

    Under these circumstances behold in one notorious instance the advantage derived from the whole crew of corruptionists – Office-holders, Borough-holders and County-holders together of the delusion thus harboured. Under /In/ the name of the East India Company, by the hands and for the profit of those corruptionists in Hindostan and the neighbourhood a number of millions amounting by this time perhaps to a hundred and every day upon the encrease, are held in a state in a state of undisguised slavery. The plunder is collected in various ways by men under various names, one of them /those/ that of Writers. A man /nobleman/ not in office being in possession of /having at his command/ a seat in the House, and for the benefit of some adherent /dependent/ being desirous of exchanging it for a /one of those/ Writership one of the Cabinet Ministers agrees with him and makes the purchase. By one of those accidents which how rare so ever will sometimes happen, the negotiation /arrangement/ transpires. Mention is made of it in the House. As to the existence of the traffic neither to the body House nor to the gallery of the House nor to the nation at large is there any thing new. But in the divulgation of any /a/ particular instance of any instance capable of being imprest and fixt in the minds of men by its individual circumstances, there is /was/ really something new: a scene not altogether unattended with disgrace to the actors has been exhibited; something must be done or at least appear to be done to the design or at least under the appearance of a design to prevent the repetition of it.
  • Title: [1823 Feb. 10 Greek Constitution Observations]
    Description: 1823 Feb. 10

    Greek Constitution Observations

    Introduction

    ?.4. Sinister sacrifice its modes

    5. Establishing in excessive number official situations in cases where the utility of the functions thence of the offices is unquestionable © Establishing needless Offices

    Examples. Keeping up a Stipendiary Land Military force in magnitude that is to say in respect of number of men greater than what is needful. So a do Naval force.

    6. Appointing /Employing/ a number of functionaries in the execution /exercise/ of a function which would be exercised with equal or superior aptitude by a single individual. An arrangement of this sort may be termed ”fractionizing• an office This arrangement has place wherever a function that might as well be exercised by an individual is committed to what in English is called a Board: in French, un Bureau or un conseil. To the power of any single individual by whom a function of the same nature is exercised without the adjunction of any other the power exercised by a member of such a board is as the fraction having for its denominator the number of the individuals of which the board is composed is to an integer. Nine Taylors according to a vulgar English proverb more remarkable for addition than for truth make a man: on this a Taylor is the ninth part of a man. With much more reason might they be predicated of the Members of those Boards by which /some of/ the most functions belonging to the Executive department are exercised: of this number are the Treasury Board, The Admiralty Board the Inaid Board called the Board of Controul for the affairs of British India The Board of Trade. The vulgar proverb had its origin in vulgar error: it supposed men of that occupation inferior in courage to men of other occupations. In the case of the political boards the notion of deficiency in manhood has no small portion of truth in it: namely in so far as the elements appropriate aptitude moral and intellectual and active are considered as so many elements of manhood. When the Presiding Member is laid out of the question, in the case of the Member of the Treasury Board not much injustice is done to him if he is set down as the 1/8th part of a man, of the Admiralty Board as 1/6th of the India Board as 1/7th of the Board of Trade as 1/10th of the Ordnance Board as 1/5.