1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
[129b-468]
27 Jan 1817
Plan Cat
Introd
**6
In the case of the East India Directors salary has been added to salary. But that example does it prove that so much as a halfpenny of salary was in that situation necessary? not it indeed: no more than that /yes: if/ the £38,000, and the £23,000 a year sinecures were necessary – and that the noble[?] proprietors who never so much as pretended /professed/ to do any service either, of this for his salary, served all the better for it. When
What then does the East India example prove? It proves that as in the universal monarchy by the matter of corruptive influences the corrupter general engages and keeps[?] the agents of the people in the constant habit of betraying their trust and sacrificing the universal interest to his and their separate interest – or in one word /two words/ to betray and cheat their principals, so in that great subordinate aristocracy by the quantity of the matter of wealth existing in the shape of matter of patronage and employed or employing itself in the character of matter of corruption, a majority of the comparatively small proportion of their principals who in respect of labour think it worth their while, and in respect of appropriate intellectual aptitude can have regarded themselves as competent to give their attendances at the small number of meetings which in the course of the year are held, have by the possession or the hope of a more than equivalent profit to themselves alone been engaged in the constant habit of thus cheating themselves and their co-proprietors together, cheating that whole concern of /in/ which their own shares formed a part
Similar Items
-
Title: [1818 Sept. 14. Things as they are]Description: 1818 Sept. 14. Things as they are Introduction §. Concentrated interest beats dilute 2 In this situation, if any man at all can be found to bestow in defence of the dilute interest the whole or any considerable portion of his thought and time, it must be whose situation in possession or in expectancy is that of a leader. But in this case /situation/, how disheartening /severe/ /constant and severe/ his toil how various numerous and constantly[?] recurring are the difficulties he has to contend with: fighting up his irregular and never tolerably disciplined army /troops/ against those who by the power of the concentrated interest are kept /being[?]/ in a state of constant dependence are kept in a proportionably perfect state of discipline. Witness in Parliament witness the Whigs in their scattered /irregular/ and but for delusion very[?] hopeless warfare against the Tories embodied /constantly embodied paid and disciplined/ under the Monarch and his Ministry. In the East India House, witness the /among the proprietors[?]/ few, who now and then stand up and lift their voice against the torrent of waste and peculation so constantly profusely kept flowing by the conjunct and concentrated sinister interest of the Directors, and through the medium of the Board of Control or India Board as it called, the Ministers of the Crown, by whom as much of the plunder and of the power by which it is produced, is under and by virtue of the laws in that behalf made, taken at all times and to as great an extent, as the joint influence of ignorance and indolence, admits of their taking the trouble to exercise it.
-
Title: [[129b-448] 16 March 1817 Plan]Description: [129b-448] 16 March 1817 Plan Cat 2 o Intro §18. Defence Inserendum One supposition indeed there is on which it might be not altogether so easy for the Right Honourable arbiter to afford a compleat acquittal to /acquit/ the Noble Lord. This is that in and by the article what in the case in question is supposed to have been employed in the capacity of an instrument of corruption an addition was made to the quantity of that matter antecedently existing at the disposal of the Servants of the Crown and destined to be applied to the purpose of sinister influence /the sort of influence here in question/. Antecedently to the establishment of the Board of Controul, that any part of the patronage of British India was in the hands of the Crown. At the time in question by the example in question it appears that a part of that patronage viz. one writership was at the command of the Servant of the Crown viz. by means[?] of the Presidency of the Board of Controul. For, one of these Writerships was it seems at the command of those faithful servants ready to be employed in the purchase in question in the purchase of the next presentation to a seat. At that time what may have been, since that time what may be, the number of those articles transferred from the East India Directors and lodged in the hands of the Board of Controul and incidentally or customarily and regularly applied to this convenient and accommodating purpose? This is the article of information, the attainment of which if practicable might, if it were only in the way of gratification to the appetite of curiosity, have its use.
-
Title: [25 Jan y 1810 Parl y Reform]Description: 25 Jan y 1810 Parl y Reform Ch.12. '.4. Mischief to Bribe giver's mind 12 3 Under this same imperious and sincerely regretted necessity found themselves the East India Company, {then Old or then New no matter which -} in King William's time, Sincerely regretted? - Yes, most unquestionably. For would they have bestowed ,130,000 or some such matter in this way to gain /obtain/ /secure/ their monopoly, if they could have got it for nothing, or indeed /in short/ if they could have obtained it on any cheaper terms? In the eyes /sight/ of the well fattened Governors and fee-fed as well as salary-fed Judges and other children of that company the monopoly of the present empire the monopoly is not a bad thing, /is no bad thing,/ and in the eyes of these fathers of the imperial company how should the embryo of it have been any thing worse?
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1