[129b-630]

19 March 1817

Plan Cat

3 o

Introd

§.10. Bribery & Terrorism

10

Text

As to the universal Seductionist, his demand – the number of points, to be compassed ere it can be satisfied – is as comprehensive as this his name. It is a maximum. Boundless not only in kind and place but time, services in every imaginable shape are comprized in it: and be it ever so ample, the supply afforded by his popinjay are but too adequate to it. As to the private seductionist where ease is here in question, in every particular but the number of the hands at which it may happen to the service to be required, his demand is a minimum: at each hand one service above required – a vote: services but one, and that a momentary one.

{In regard to hazard, however, the same exemption is possessed in both situations. Whatsoever may be the quantum of seductive force possessed and efficiently exercised by the particular seductionist in the exercise thus given to terrific seduction, no sort of hazard is he in his seduction exposed to any more than the universal seductionist in the exercise given to his seductive power in its alluring shape. (a)}

Note (a)

(a) Cocagne is the name of a sort of object which in France was, on gala occasions wont to be held out by authority to the concupiscence of the multitude. It was composed of a various mass of eatables piled up in the form of a pyramid. At a signal given, the multitude were let in to scramble for its contents. In one particular the cocagne institution differs from the C – r General’s popinjay: in the one case, nothing is done for what is got: in the other case every thing: many a thing long before any thing is got, and by many a man by whom nothing is ever got by it.

End of the Note.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[129b-416] 22 Mar. 1817 Plan]
    Description: [129b-416]

    22 Mar. 1817

    Plan Cat

    2 o

    Introd

    §.11. Seat Traffic

    II. Absorption certain

    3

    To the reader {of Old Mortality’s[?] the popinjay} to him whose acquaintance with French customs has brought it under his view, the cocapus, best of the how[?] the cocapus may serve to pourtray the situation to which in this country the C – r General is indebted for so large a portion of his power. What the {popinjay was or is to the sharp shooters what the} cocapus was or is or was to the scramblers, the pile /pyramid/ round which the assemblage of bribes royal is kept suspended above /over/ and in view of all heads is to the band /squad/ of corruptionists corruption hunters and corruption hunters To engage men in the pursuit no particular invitation applied individually to individuals can ever be necessary: permission – general and even universal permission is quite sufficient Permission if in the most general head /terms/ nor even that expressed by words. There stands the pile with the popinjay at /hanging from the/ top of it, shoot at it who will /list[?]/: there stands /rears its head/ the pyramid with the assortment of bribes royal all around it, scramble for it who will. Of the scramble for ribbons a view has been given by the historian of /biographer of Captain/ Gullian[?]: but a ribbon is but one out of the vast number of objects of concupiscence with which the cocapi of the Corrupter General is bedecked.
  • Title: [[129b-401] 16 March 1817 +]
    Description: [129b-401]

    16 March 1817 +

    Plan Cat

    2 o

    Introd

    §.10. Bribery & Forgery

    3

    18

    {There it is; they see it is: and to what sort of exertions the hope of securing any part in it is confined, they know but too well: they know as well as he or any body could tell them: Causes such how is it with effects? On the situation of the dependent throng, universal obsequiousness: a compilation of obsequiousness As to the master of the maypole – the potentate – in his situation. Not so much as the semble of issuing commands need he have: conjecture anticipates them; /keeps itself on the look-out, and anticipates them: and, in the anticipation, stretches beyond the utmost extension which in the everlastingly parallel lines of waste, war, taxation and oppression he himself would have given to them: and while, in the course of the scramble, the idolatrous throng are covering themselves with the mud of corruption, aloft sits the object of their idolatry, presenting to all eyes the image of unsullied purity.}

    {Insensibly, from the case of the private, the pen has slid into the case of the public and universal seductionist. But the digression may be altogether not without its use. Of the seductive influence in this lastmentioned case the /scarcely as yet do the/ circumstances appear to have ever been sufficiently brought to view, nor consequently any adequate conception commonly entertained of the immensity, the hope-extinguishing irresistibility of its force }
  • Title: [1818 Aug. 6 + § 10 Parl Ref Bill]
    Description: 1818 Aug. 6 + § 10

    Parl Ref Bill

    Reasons

    §.10 Election how

    Voting secret why

    New York

    1

    Morn g Chron. 6. Aug. 1818 Letter signed a British subject dated New York June 27 1817.

    An account of the Election process as conducted in the State of New York has lately been made public in the Morning Chronicle of the 6 th of August 1818.

    In principle it is the same with /agrees with/ that here proposed but in the means employed for the pursuance /attainment/ of the end there are some not very material differences may be observed /are observable/

    For the security of freedom as well against seductive intimidation as against bribery and other alluring seduction secrecy is endeavoured to be given to the several suffrages, and ballot is the name employed.

    Evils thus admitted 1. Miselection by subjection to undue influence

    1. But the particular mode employed is – {not the dropping in of a counter which whoever may be the proposed Member meant to be favoured is exactly the same implement} but by | the dropping in of a ticket containing the name of the candidate meant to be favoured, / :/ and which / but the ticket/ may be in print, or in manuscript and in this case in the handwriting of the voter or of any other person, as the voter pleases. Suppose this influence to have place: by the person exercising it, the person on whom it is exercised may be required to give in in his own handwriting the name of the person voted for.

    2. The persons on whose vigilance the security against fraud is reposed are – not the agents of the proposed Members – parties to the great cause, but a trio of official persons, named by other official persons.

    On one of these three it depends what tickets shall be received and dropt into the box: if then he /they/ be to such a degree partial to this or that proposed Member, voters in any number may cause to be dropt into the box two tickets or perhaps more each of them having the effect of a vote. For those tickets which for secresy are to be delivered in ready folded, no precise form can therefore be prescribed, such as may be and is prescribed in the here-proposed mode.