[Some marginal summary paras. on this folio. This transcript is the material which is not marginal summary paras.]

1817 Sept. 14

Not Paul

§. 1. For aptitude /judgment/ of style in antient writings the existing state of things is no improper object of reference. What would be unapt now was unapt then. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9

§. 2 Forms of inaptitude in style and intellectual weakness in discourse /argumentation/

1. Obscurity in its highest degree nonsensicalness

2. Irrelevant argumentation

3. Irrelevant reference. Demonstration ex auctoritate ill-conducted.

4. Desultoriness

 then[?] consult[?] J.B. […?] qualities desirable in Style and Language.

10. 11. 12. 13.

§. 3. By obscurity, inspiration may be disproved: and in Paul’s case […?] 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50.

§. 4 Nonsense - its abundance in Paul’s discourses. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.

§. Paul’s demonstrations ex auctoritate - their irrelevancy. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[Around folios 1 to 19] Defence of]
    Description: [Around folios 1 to 19]

    Defence of Economy - II. ag t I. Burke

    Ch. 4

    Concerning party men and their principles.

    [Around folios 1 to 13]

    Sextus for B.

    [Around folios 20 to 41]

    Ch. 9. Paul’s Style. I. Argument.

    §. 1. For judging of aptitude of style in antient discourses the existing state of

    things is no improper object of reference. What would be unapt now was unapt then.

    §. 2. Forms of inaptitude in style - Forms of intellectual weakness in argumentation: 1.

    Obscurity; - in its highest degree, Nonsensicalness: 2 Irrelevancy in argumentation; 3.

    Irrelevancy in reference - demonstration ex auctoritate ill conducted; 4. Desultoriness

    §. 3. By obscurity, inspiration may be disproved: and in Paul’s case, is.

    §. 4. Nonsense - its abundance in Paul’s discourses.

    §. 5. Paul’s demonstrations ex auctoritate - their irrelevancy.

    [verso]

    Ch. 8 2 o

    Paul’s Style.

    [Around folios 42 to 57]

    Ch. 6 I. Argument

    Paul’s Style

    §. Different forms of Nonsense observable in the discourses of S t

    Paul

    [Around folios 58 to 68]

    I. Argument

    2 1

    Style and Character

    [Around folios 69 to 85]

    I. Argument

    Ch

    Paul’s Character

    §. 1. All things to all men.

    §. 2. Falsified predictions.

    [Around folios 86 to 128]

    I. Argument

    Ch. 6

    Of Quasi-Miracles, Visions, Quasi-Visions and Trances.

    [Around folios 133 to 140]

    I. Argument.

    Ch. 7

    Natural causes of Paul’s Success.

    §. 1. Energy - how operating as a pledge of security it produces persuasion in favour of

    any discourse /doctrine/ howsoever absurd.

    §. 2. Nonsense - its advantage - it is refutation proof.

    §. 3. The success of a religion is no proof of its verity.

    §. 4. The more absurd a religion, the stronger the attachment to it.

    [Full folio wrapper around folios 141 to 214]

    [front cover]

    III Style.

    Character.

    III. Doctrine

    (exclusive of Asceticism.

    [spine]

    1818.

    Not Paul.

    Style

    Character

    and

    Doctrine

    not

    concerning

    Asceticism.

    [Around folios 141 to 162]

    III. Doctrine

    Ch

    Paul’s Doctrines

    §. 1. Plan of this Chapter

    §. 2. Paul’s doctrine avowedly independent of that delivered to us as Jesus’s

    §. 2. Real object and design of Paul’s doctrines - his temporal advancement.

    §. 3. Doctrines more immediately subservient to that end 1. Magnification of faith: viz

    in the sense inculcated by him.

    §. 4. — 2. Depreciation of works: viz. in that Mosaic sense in which they were rivals to

    faith as above in the struggle for salvation

    §. 5. Doctrines less immediately and forcibly subservient: 1. Mysticism. 2. Asceticism

    [Around folios 163 to 172]

    Not Paul

    III. Doctrine

    § Mysticism on the commemoration of the death of Jesus.

    [verso]

    Not Paul

    Ch.

    Conclusion.

    [Around folios 173 to 186]

    III. Doctrine.

    Ch. III. Faith - its alledged necessity to salvation - alledged duty of possessing it.

    [Around folios 187 to 199]

    Ch. 9.

    Paul’s Doctrine Ch. or §. Causes of Paul’s asceticism

    §. 1. Cause I. In all other pursuits he beheld rivals to that he

    preached: the greater the pleasure, the more formidable the rivalry

    §. 2. II Cause II. Notion he found prevalent - heaven not to be purchased but by

    sacrifices: the greater the sacrifice, the surer the purchase.

    §. 3. Paul’s arguments in support of asceticism - their absurdity.

    §. 4. By his anxiety to obtain female married converts, Paul is led into repugnancy to

    Jesus

    [Around folio 208]

    III. Doctrine.

    excepting Asceticism.

    [Around folios 209 to 211]

    Not Paul III Doctrine

    §. 1. Faith - Paul’s meaning by it. Faith in him, or to his use

    [Around folios 212 to 214]

    III. Doctrine.

    Ch. 10

    Ch. 10 Mischievous Doctrines, deduced from Paul but unwarrantably
  • Title: [[Some marginal summary paras. on this folio]
    Description: [Some marginal summary paras. on this folio. This transcript is the material which is not marginal summary paras.]

    1817 Sept. 16

    Not Paul

    §. 1. I. In All other pursuits he beheld rivals to that he was preaching: the greater the pleasure, the more formidable the rivality. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8

    §. 2 II. Notion he found prevalent - heaven not to be purchased but by sacrifice: the more valuable the sacrifice, the surer the purchase. 9. 10. 11. 12.

    §. 3. Paul’s arguments in support of asceticism - their absurdity. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24

    §. 4. Paul is led into repugnancy to Jesus by his anxiety to obtain married female converts. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.
  • Title: [[Some marginal summary paras. on this folio]
    Description: [Some marginal summary paras. on this folio. This transcript is the material which is not marginal summary paras.]

    1817 Oct. 25

    §. 1. A Quasi-Miracle or rather a Quasi-miraculous account, what. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 6.

    §. 2. The Acts quasi-miracles were of his own making. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

    §. 3. Instrument for the fabrication of a quasi-miracle - spiritual double entendre hence a verbal miracle 16. 31.

    §. 4. Visions - their essential unfitness to serve as a support of a religion. 17. 18

    §. 5. Of Paul’s edition of Jesus’s religion, visions the sole support: his own he could not have ventured upon such a support, without hanging it on upon Jesus’s. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23

    §. 6. A Vision and Quasi-Vision. 26. 38. 39. 40

    §. 7. A Trance, what: it affords opportunity for a Vision. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53

     Look over the Acts miracles and class them into

    1 Quasi-miracles made by a double entendre and

    2. Natural occurrences left to be made into supernatural by inference

    §. 8. Cluster of Miracles unparticularized: 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33.

    §. 9. Quasi-Miracles, Visions, Quasi-Visions, and Cluster of unparticularized Miracles their advantages: 24. 25. 26. 28. 29. 60. 61.

    §. 10 Modern Quasi-Miracles, their abundance. 34 35. 36. 37. 51.

    §. 11. Difference in respect of probative force between a miracle perceived and d o read of. 55, 56. 57. 58. 59