date

1817 Oct. 13 Not Paul Heading
1817 Oct. 13

Not Paul

Heading for

II History

§. 2 Matthias vice Judas

§ 2. Matthias chosen

§. 2 Choice of Matthias to be an associate of the Apostles

Acts I. 13 to 26

{a witness with us of his resurrection} As to /In regard to/ this transaction no reason presents itself for questioning either the existence of the transaction itself or the correctness of the account here /there/ given of it: in its nature, in all Christian eyes it could not but have been of the most notorious. No length of time was likely to obliterate or in any considerable /very material/ degree obscure or lead astray the recollection of it.

To a first glance, the term witness of his resurrection applied to the function of an associate of the apostles may be liable /apt/ to present the idea of impropriety /inappositeness/: on a closer view it will disappear /vanish/.

A witness is either a percipient witness a reporting witness or both in one: of course no person so fit for a reporting as a percipient witness. Of percipient witnesses to a past transaction the number is not an object of choice, of reporting witnesses, yes: since there is no limit to the encrease[?]. Every person by whom a transaction is spoken of to others who had not before heard of it, is thereby with relation to it in some sort a reporting witness: in this sense even at this time of day a Missionary who preaches the Gospel among the heathen is thereby a witness to it.

In the case /instance/ in question, attached to the function of preaching the Gospel to those without doors appears to have been that of bearing a part with administration managing the concerns political and financial of the spiritual company. According to Luke a ׀ ׀ as above to the ascension of Jesus the eleven apostles were not the only percipient witnesses: two others are spoken of of whom Cleophas by name: of the two persons here in question viz. Joseph Barrabas and Matthias had been /were/ partakers /sharers/ in the same inestimable privilege, they were unquestionably by so much the better qualified for the situation of an associate to the apostles, considered in respect of their function of reporting witnesses of that concluding and crowning portion of the acts and sayings of Jesus.

a
Similar Items
  • Title: [1822 Decr 13 Tripoli. Securities against]
    Description: 1822 Decr 13

    Tripoli. Securities against Misrule

    7o

    Preliminary Explanations

    ?.2. Remedy Publicity

    Publ. Opin. Tribunal

    ?3 Functions compared

    On the former day, intimation was /is/ moreover given, of certain other persons, as having been percipient witnesses of the act or this or that inculpative circumstance belonging to it, and as being thereby rendered capable, if so disposed, of becoming /rendering themselves/ in relation thereto reporting narrating or say deposing witnesses Here a commencement of the function of collecting evidence stands exemplified.

    Purchasers, in number more or less considerable, being in the habit of filing and preserving the numbers of the Newspaper in question as they come out, here the function of keeping in store in a word of storing the stock of evidence in question stands exemplified.

    4. With the evidence thus received, compelled, collected and kept in store, are commonly at the same time mixt up and thus received and kept in store, in some proportion or other, matter on both sides bearing the character of argument: argument having for object the bringing to view either the probability or improbability of the alledged act or of the alledged inculpative circumstances, or the impropriety or propriety of it, or both together: each party by or with the argument he delivers, directly or virtually calling for counter argument on the other side. Here then the function of receiving arguments at the hands of parties litigant or their advocates, or both, stands exemplified. The function of reading or hearing these /the/ arguments this mass of argument together with the correspondent mass of evidence is in this case left to the purchasers and other readers or hearers of the Newspaper, each one exercising it for himself, or his associates /this or that associate of his/.
  • Title: [8 June 1804 Procedure Evidence]
    Description: 8 June 1804

    Procedure Evidence

    Ch Investigat?

    §.6 Order - Rules.

    §6. Order of investigation, direct and retrograde, through a chain of hearsay evidence.

    Rule 1. In a chain of hearsay evidence, containing a number of intermediate links, consisting of the supposed statements of so many intermediate supposed reporting witnesses, interposed between the deposing and the supposed percipient or other immediate extra-judicial witness, on receiving indication, as above, of the supposed purport on the statement of the supposed percipient or immediate extra-judicial witness, the witness to be resorted to and convinced in the next instance is such supposed immediate witness.

    Reason - By the convention and examination of the several intermediate witnesses, so much collateral inconvenience vexation, expense and delay will of course be produced. All which will, in case the supposed percipient or immediate witness has any evidence to give on the subject, be unnecessary and useless.

    Rule 2. But if, on being examined, the supposed immediate witness denies all knowledge of the transaction, or gives /yields/ such testimony as is irreconciliable with the statement supposed to have been given in relation to his supposed extra-judicial statement, by the intermediate witness, by whom it is supposed to have been heard, in such case it may be proper and necessary to convene such intermediate witness of the first remove with the /such/ supposed immediate witness, whether for the purpose of contradicting and refuting the supposed immediate witness or assisting and correcting his recollections.

    Reason. In this case, this step in the investigation becomes as plainly necessary, as it was seen to be unnecessary in the former case.
  • Title: [1817 Nov Not Paul Ch Paul’s]
    Description: 1817 Nov

    Not Paul

    Ch Paul’s Character

    1. First as to the resurrection of Jesus. Select in the highest degree - select and much too select to be in comparison of what it suited Paul’s purpose to cause it to be believed to be numerous - was the company /number/ of the persons to whom if either the evangelical historian, or the Apostle Peter himself are to be believed Jesus after his resurrection and before his ascension, manifested himself in the flesh. Apostles, eleven in number after the defection of the traitor Judas - add perhaps Mary Magdalene with or without a very few other women, and a very few other disciples, of whom Cleophas was one, and perhaps Matthew the elected Co-adjutor of the Apostles another. Small indeed must have been the total number if the author of the Acts is to be believed on the occasion on which Peter himself speaking /addressing himself/ says to the Roman Centurion Cornelius and his houshold and a company of his own attendants Peter himself is made to say (v. 40) Him (Jesus) God raised up the third day (after his being v. 39 ‘hanged on a tree’) ‘and shewed him openly, v. 41 ‘Not to all the people, but unto witnesses, chosen before of God, {even} to us, who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead.’

    Luke XXIV. 9. the women told it (what they had seen and heard at the sepulchre) to the eleven and to all the rest πασι τοις λοιποις.

    Acts X. 39 to 42.

    The object being to gain credence is it /it is/ in the nature of the case that by any one concerned, the number of the percipient witnesses on whose veracity all other credence depended should in any account given of it [have] been made to fall short of the truth.

    Within any such narrow limits the audacity of Paul disdained to confine itself. Five hundred was a round number - a number much more surely probative than any between a dozen and a score. ‘Above five hundred’ is accordingly the number by which he takes upon him to assure the Corinthians, Jesus after his resurrection was seen: by all this vast number ‘at once’; and that on one of several occasions.

    I. Cor. XVI. 6 Actually I. Cor. XV. 6.