1
results found in
17 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821 April 15:
First Lines
Means
Distributive
4 Equality
\PS\.4. Equality
Fourth on the list of the benefits which the Civil Branch of the Law is occupied in
distributing - /is/ equality.
Of the four several possessions, for which according to their several natures,
security for individuals is required individually considered, property is the only
one, with relation to which, equality requires, or with propriety admits of, any
considerable diversification. With the exception of such cases Except in so far as
security cannot be given /afforded/ to one man, but by defalcation made from the
security given /afforded/ to another -, where is the man to whom appropriate security
ought not to be afforded for his person for his reputation or for his condition in
life? Where is the man to whom for any one of those three possessions, greater or
better security ought to be afforded than to any other?
Remains property as the only one of the four possessions, remains property as the
only one in relation to which, the application of the benefit of equality requires
any considerable discrimination or reserve.
Subsistence, security, - to the value of both these benefits, the value of that
which is presented by the word equality, is plainly subordinate. In regard to
subsistence the case is - that considered as apart from, and unaccompanied by,
abundance, equality is essentially involved and included in the very conception of
it: for as consistently with the supposition no man can in this case have more of the
means of subsistence than another, so consistently with his existence no man can have
less.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1821 April 15 First Lines Means]Description: 1821 April 15 First Lines Means Ch 1. Distributive 3. Security \PS\.3. Security - Third on the list of the benefits which the Civil branch of the Law is occupied in distributing is security. Security considered as applied to individuals has for its objects, four distinguishable possessions: person, reputation, property, and condition in life. Security has for its adversaries, against whose enterprises it is to be afforded, three classes of persons differently situated and denominated viz. foreign adversaries considered as such, - foreigners considered in s far as they are, or are liable to become adversaries; fellow citizens or fellow-subjects, considered in that same light; rulers viz. of the country in question considered in that same light. Of /As to/ the acts against which, security is to be afforded and by which in so far as they are committed /performed/, security is broken in upon and lessened, /they are/ in themselves and their immediate effects are the same, by which soever of the three species of adversaries they are exercised. Taken however in the aggregate, they are wont to be designated by a different denomination according to the situation of the class, to which the person or persons by whom they are exercised, is considered as belonging: if to that of foreign adversaries, they are denominated acts of hostility: if, to that of domestic adversaries, considered in the character of subjects, acts of delinquency; if to that of domestic adversaries, considered in the character of rulers, acts of oppression, or if the oppression be considered as to a certain degree flagrant, acts of tyranny: if The mode /operation/ in which
-
Title: [1821 April 15 S.3. Security]Description: 1821 April 15 S.3. Security Third on the list of the benefits which the Civil branch of the Law is occupied in distributing security. Security considered as applied to individuals has for its objects, four distinguishable possessions: person, reputation, property, and condition in life. Security has for its adversaries, against whose enterprises is to be afforded, three classes of persons differently situated and denominated viz. foreign adversaries considered as such, — foreigners considered in so far as they are, or are liable to become adversaries; fellow citizens or fellow subjects, considered in that same light; rulers viz. of the country in question considered in that same light. As to Acts against which, security is to be afforded & by which in so far as they are performed , security or broken in upon & lessened, they are in themselves & their immediate effects the same, by which soever of the three species of adversaries they are exercised. Taken however in the aggregate, they are wont to be designated by a different denomination according to the situation of the class, to which the person or persons by whom they are exercised, is considered as belonging: if to that of foreign adversaries, they are denominated acts of hostility: if, to that of domestic adversaries, considered in the character of subjects, acts of delinquency; if to that of domestic adversaries, considered in the character of rulers, acts of oppression, or if the oppression be considered as to a certain degree flagrant, acts of tyrannt: if operation
-
Title: [1821. April 8th Explanations]Description: 1821. April 8th Explanations Equality 1. [...?] ) (.2. [...?] By equality is here meant - not the utmost conceivable equality, but only practicable equality. The utmost conceivable equality has place only in the field of physics: it applies only to weight, measure, time, and thence to motion. Subsistence, abundance, security - for these three may there is place in the case of a simple individual: equality in reference to any one of those instruments of felicity, supposes the existence of individuals more than one: in the case of any number, it is conceivable will equal these. The utmost conceivable equality - say absolute equality admits not of degrees: practicable equality does admit of degrees. Equality is not itself, as those other three are, an immediate instrument of felicity: it operates only through the medium of those three: especially through abundance and security. Of all three taken together, the use, fruit and object, is felicity, - the maximum of felicity: the greatest happiness of the greatest number: of this maximum the magnitude is in proportion to equality: to /depends upon/ the degree of equality that has place in the distribution of /proportions in which/ those three are distributed. Apply it first to subsistence: strictly taken means or instruments of subsistence. Subsistence taken in the strict sense, there is not in this case in a place for degrees in the scale of equality: for by the supposition no inequality has place in this case. As contradistinguished from the instruments of abundance, by the means of subsistence is meant that least quantity of those instruments, which is such that with any lesser quantity, existence could not have place: no subsistence, no existence.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1