1
results found in
18 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821 April 16.
First Lines
Means
Distributive
4 Equality
Remains to be considered how far and in what way advance is capable of being made
towards absolute equality - equality is capable of being promoted - advance made
towards absolute equality - and addition thus made to the greatest happiness of the
greatest number - without prejudice to security.
For this purpose, it will be necessary to observe in what way it is that by
defalcations made from security, happiness is diminished.
1. When and inproportion as by any cause defalcation to any amount is made from the
mass of a man's property whether in possession or in contingency, a correspondent
defalcation, - there is always sufficient reason for believing - is thereby made from
the sum of his happiness.
The defalcation thus made for /from/ happiness, may have place, without his being
apprised of the defalcation made from his property.
Such is the case for example where a man having in his possession a mass of property
the exact amount of which is not known to him, a defalcation not known or suspected
by him is made from it whether by design or accident.
So again in case of contingency. A gift or legacy being without his knowledge
intended for him, a third person intervenes and without his knowledge or suspicion
prevents the intention from being executed.
In this case happiness is diminished viz. by diminution of pleasure. But in this
case no positive pain is produced.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1821. April 16. First Lines.]Description: 1821. April 16. First Lines. Means Distributive 4 Equality In the instance /case/ of each individual, a particular period /point of time/ there is at which, without defalcation made from security in his instance, or in the instance of any other individual, a distribution may be made his properly may be subjected to a distribution or other disposition, whereby, according to the amount of it, equality will be promoted, advance towards absolute equality may be made. This time is the time of a man's death. In his instnce, no such evil is produced, for he is no more. In the instance of no other individual if, in this instance, sufficient and effective care has been taken to exclude expectation, no evil will /evil/ be produced: for the only evil incident to the case is disappointment, and, by the exclusion of expectation has been excluded. Whatsoever be the amount of a man's property, if, within a certain distance from him in the line of natural relationship, relation of his, knowing themselves to be such, and known by him to be such, are in existence, the /an/ expectation of possessing, at the time of his death, the whole, or a portion more or less considerable, of that property, (with the exception of such part, if any, as it is known will terminate at his death,) will, in proportion to their several degrees of propinquity and correspondent amity, be /entertained: that is/ in the instance of such of them as, in respect of age and other circumstances, are capable of entertaining expectations of this nature, be entertained
-
Title: [1821 April 16 First Lines Means]Description: 1821 April 16 First Lines Means Distributive 4 Equality 2. Where /If/ a defalcation to /with/ his knowledge and without his free consent, a defalcation is made from the mass of his property, if it be without his knowledge and free consent, - in this case over and above the sort of negative defalcation made as above, a defalcation of a positive aspect is made: viz. by means of and in proportion to, a particular pain which in some quantity or other he cannot fail to experience. A pain of privation or a pain of loss, are the names by which this species of pain has been distinguished. 3. If from the operation of a cause, the same with, or similar to, that one from the operation of which, a loss as above has been sustained by a man, he is made to entertain the apprehension of further /ulterior/ loss produced by ulterior operations of the same cause, another pain of a different description takes place in addition to the above, this pain has been denominated a pain of apprehension grounded on loss. 4 If had it not been for the loss thus incurred or the loss thus apprehended the man would have continued or engaged in some profit-seeking and profitable course of labour, he is by the apprehension of the like eventual loss prevented from continuing or engaging in such course, a loss to a futher amount is thus produced, and by means of it, it will generally happen an additional and correspondent pain. The loss has been denominated loss by depression of industry: the pain, pain from repressed /repression of/ industry.
-
Title: [1821 April 15: First Lines]Description: 1821 April 15: First Lines Means Distributive 4 Equality \PS\.4. Equality Fourth on the list of the benefits which the Civil Branch of the Law is occupied in distributing - /is/ equality. Of the four several possessions, for which according to their several natures, security for individuals is required individually considered, property is the only one, with relation to which, equality requires, or with propriety admits of, any considerable diversification. With the exception of such cases Except in so far as security cannot be given /afforded/ to one man, but by defalcation made from the security given /afforded/ to another -, where is the man to whom appropriate security ought not to be afforded for his person for his reputation or for his condition in life? Where is the man to whom for any one of those three possessions, greater or better security ought to be afforded than to any other? Remains property as the only one of the four possessions, remains property as the only one in relation to which, the application of the benefit of equality requires any considerable discrimination or reserve. Subsistence, security, - to the value of both these benefits, the value of that which is presented by the word equality, is plainly subordinate. In regard to subsistence the case is - that considered as apart from, and unaccompanied by, abundance, equality is essentially involved and included in the very conception of it: for as consistently with the supposition no man can in this case have more of the means of subsistence than another, so consistently with his existence no man can have less.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1