date

[clx. 350] 1822 July 14 Constitut
[clx. 350]

1822 July 14

Constitut. Code Rationale

Securities Counterforce

4 Legal responsibility

5 Moral responsibility

Evidence etc its necessity?

The power /efficiency/ of the popular or moral sanction with its Public-Opinion Tribunal can not be strengthened, but the efficiency of the law in so far as its force is employed in augmentation of the happiness of the people is also strengthened. In so far as misdeed, which by reason of its detrimental effect on happiness is vicious, and thereby exposes the agent to punishment at the hands of the Public-Opinion Tribunal is moreover criminal - an act of delinquency against the law exposing the agent to punishment at the hands of the law, every channel through which defamation as above may be divulgated is a channel through which in so far as the defamation takes this turn, strength and efficiency is given to the law. Through these channels men who in themselves are, and would otherwise remain, helpless, receive help, and abatement of their sufferings: injuries and sufferings which would otherwise swell to an indefinite bulk, /a boundless magnitude, and rendered altogether remediless/ are met by complaint, and kept within bounds: through this channel men who by their own indigence and the rapacity of lawyers are rendered destitute /deprived/ of all help at the hands of the legal sanction with its tribunals /judicatories/ find a limit and thence a mitigation to their sufferings For suppose the act in question to be of the number of those to which punishment is /stands/ attached as well by /at/ the hands /power/ of the legal sanction as at the hands of the popular or moral sanction, as well at the hands of the legal judicatories as at the hands of the Public-Opinion: this being the case, to give intimation of it to the members of the community at large in their capacity of members of the Public-Opinion Tribunal is to give indication by the help /light/ of which not only witnesses, but prosecutors at the bar of the competent legal tribunal, may be brought into action, and the further investigation of whatsoever relevant facts would otherwise remain in darkness promoted /produced/: that which to the uncorrupted free and ever open Public Opinion Tribunal is evidence to the purpose of conviction in an immediate way, being to the legal tribunal, evidence to the purpose of investigation for the obtainment of ulterior evidence, such as suffices in the first place for a ground to accusation, and in the next place for the obtainment of such evidence as shall suffice for conviction and punishment.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[xxxviii. 25] 1822. July 15]
    Description: [xxxviii. 25]

    1822. July 15

    Constitut. Code Rationale.

    Securities

    5 Moral Counterforce

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Evidence and Comments

    33. 2. So, on the field of taste: viz.

    1. Of the sexual appetite, eccentricities by which no power is produced. By indication of them, power may be produced enough to fill a whole life with bitterness. Enemy to greatest happiness, not the agent but the indicator. Greater the evil produced by the indication where the │   │ has than where it has not been done. By groundlessness of the indication is afforded comfort in the opposite case wanting.

    34. 2. Breach of marriage contract, particularly on female side. Act unknown, pleasure none, pain none. For punishing an act, sole good reason, the danger it produces of disclosure: disclosure generally but too probable.

    35. Advantages of this moral over legal punishment.

    1. Application more extensive, even all-comprehensive: viz. to every thing by which happiness is lessened: to vices as well as crimes.

    2. More gentle: incapable of running into such great excess.

    3. More extensive: not exposed to be evaded by want of evidence and by quibbles.

    Better reason therefore for crying out against legal punishment than against defamation.

    36. So far as law contributes to greatest happiness, Public opinion Tribunal strengthens it. Against all acts vitious enough to be punished as criminal, it furnishes it with a fund of Evidence in the shape of defamation, in so far as useful and true.

    37 Through this channel, depredation and oppression inflicted for want of law or by law, are met by complaint, and their course stopt or retarded. Sufferers, otherwise helpless, receive mitigation.

    38 Act (suppose) not only vitious but punishable. Give intimation of it through the appropriate channel to Public opinion Tribunal, the information thus furnished, though it can not be acted upon by Judges to the purpose of conviction may be by individuals to the purpose of prosecution and investigation of legally receivable Evidence.

    39. Against evil produced or protected by Rulers, i.e. by the law, this applies the only remedy.

    40. Every endeavour to destroy or diminish this counterforce is do. to apply strength to misrule, decrease to human happiness, encrease to human misery.

    Of the foulest individual crime nothing worse, nothing so bad, can with truth be said.
  • Title: [[clx. 349] 1822 July 12 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 349]

    1822 July 12

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securitites Counterforce

    4 Legal

    5 Moral

    Evidence necessity of?

    Defamation necessity of

    They may be considered as crying out - I am a scoundrel! etc.

    Those who cry out against what they call the licentiousness of the press, as if it were so much uncompensated evil, for /against/ which compleat suppression would be an appropriate and innoxious remedy /cure/ might with much more reason cry out against the pure and simple abolition of all punishment without distinction and in particular against all punishment at the hands of the legal sanction and the tribunals by which the force of that sanction is applied: for in no other form, at once so gentle and so efficient and in particular in no form of legal punishment could punishment be employed in the repression of any thing that has ever been characterized by the names of crime or vice by the name of vice.

    Punishment as applied by the legal tribunals - punishment applied under the name of punishment attaches to such mischievous /evil/ acts alone the mischief of which has place as well in a shape sufficiently detrimental, and /as/ in a quantity sufficiently great to warrant the application of evil in the shape and in the quality in which it is so denominated /the denomination of punishment is in common use/. Punishment as applied by the Public Opinion, applied as it is in effect without the name, attaches itself to mischief in all shapes in which the hand of man can without special and sufficient justification be instrumental to the production of it.

    Applied by the legal tribunal, punishment is not only thus narrow in its application /applicability/ and thence in its use: but exposed continually exposed to the danger of running into excess: excess from /such/ the danger of which the punishment which the Public-Opinion Tribunal makes application of is altogether exempt and free.
  • Title: [[xxxviii. 23] 1822 July 15]
    Description: [xxxviii. 23]

    1822 July 15

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities

    5 Moral Counterforce

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    A few articles

    Exposition and Rationale

    15. II. Representative Democracy. Here, without difficulty legal responsibility, universal, may have place. During office, no: not the whole nor a majority: to say yes would be self contradictory. But during office the minority: after office all may be punishable: just as every one else is: for misdeeds there as elsewhere. See accordingly articles,│   │

    16. Moral responsibility. This is to the purpose of eventual exposure to punishment by the │   │ of the popular or moral sanction at the hands of Public opinion Tribunal: (viz. the democratical section of it. Quere this here) like the │   │ invisible, but not the less operative.

    17. To punishment such as is inflictible by this Tribunal, not only in a Representative Democracy, but even in an absolute Monarchy, may the possessors of the supreme operative stand excluded/posed/.

    18. In this sense and shape even in an absolute Monarchy, even the Monarch feels himself responsible: though to the purpose of mitigation, of Monarch's oppression and depredation subject's sufferings, the effect is hardly perceptible.

    19. Counterforce beneficial the less the legal, the greater the need of moral. In Monarchy, legal none, thence of the moral, need a maximum: actual quantity a minimum. Cause, the security afforded by the moral against the sinister sacrifice.

    (Insert note on the toleration in Tuscany and Russia.)

    20. Contrast. In Representative Democracy, legal counterforce compleatly effective: need of the moral, for this purpose, a minimum: actual quantity a maximum.

    21 Ao. 1803. In a season of insufficient experience, partly on account of the annoyance to individuals, supreme operatives deprived the community of this security. But greatest happiness etc. being the end, and by all seen to be so, it was restored by lapse of time, and is now fixt for as long as the democracy lasts.