date

[clx. 359] 1822 July 25 Constitut
[clx. 359]

1822 July 25

Constitut. Code Rationale

Securities

5 Moral Counterforce

Public Opinion Tribunal

Evidence etc

J.Bs cure to prevent secret suppression by Editors' veto

Defamation to the prejudice of ruling functionaries as such

Among the consequences of the restrictions imposed in the ordinary form on the press one is the efficiency thus given to false reports in their most mischievous shape: false and mischievous reports as such, whosoever may be the parties on whom the evil produced by them falls

In the first place let the situation be that of the ruling functionaries, and in particular those of the highest degree /rank/ in the scale of subordination. Defamation in the written shape it is possible to keep suppressed. Defamation to the same effect in an oral shape it is not possible to keep suppressed. You may keep a watch upon all presses: you can not keep a watch upon all tongues. When it is in a printed shape it is in a determinate shape: and whatever be the shape of it in other respects being in a determinate and that an enduring shape, any one who is /feels/ disposed to make answer to it, knows what it is he answers, and where to find it. In whatever shape it first makes its appearance, in that shape it remains it can not by the author or by the adopter be altered from shape to shape in a manner repugnant /contrary/ to truth and justice, just as occasion calls. It may be met and it may opposed in whatsoever manner is best adapted to the nature of it: is it in any way false? it may be opposed by simple denial: it may be opposed by the statement of the opposite truth: is it not only false but improbable? the arguments demonstrative of the improbability may be opposed to it: is it injurious is it mischievous? the mischievousness of it may be exposed /laid open to view/, and shame /reproach/ proportioned to the evil be poured down upon the head of the author and his accomplices, or prepared and kept in readiness to be poured down upon them in proportion as they are discovered. /presented to view./
Similar Items
  • Title: [[clx. 347] 1822 July 12 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 347]

    1822 July 12

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities Counterforce

    4. Legal

    5. Moral

    Evidence etc necessity of

    Defamation necessity of

    To save himself from being restrained in the commission of one evil act he renders himself an accomplice in /accessary to/ all others

    Of every such indication - and of every such comment - the effect or tendency is defamation: defamation with reference to the party to whom the alleged pernicious act whatsoever it be is thereby imputed. To oppose defamation as such to oppose without exception or discrimination every act to which the term defamation can with propriety be applied is to act as an accomplice to all crimes as an instrument of all mischief of all misery, as above

    Every such act is therefore a virtual confession of such complicity: of such hostility to the happiness of the greatest number

    In the sinister interest by which they are engaged /led/ in the endeavour to effect such suppression, functionaries engaged in giving execution and effect to the acts of a bad government and functionaries engaged in misdeeds for their own benefit in disobedience to the good acts of a good government are naturally joined by individuals concerned or meaning to be concerned in such pernicious acts to the repression of which the power of the legal sanction is not applicable.

    Proportioned every where to the hostility of the form of government and of the practice under it to the greatest happiness of the greatest number will of course be the exertions made by the Governors to deprive the governed of this security to keep the governed for ever deprived of this their only security: the only security which the nature of the case admitts of.

    To profess to be a supporter either of good government or of good morals and at the same time to profess to be desirous of seeing defamation suppressed or even restricted in the /a/ case in which the imputation conveyed by it is true, is little less than a contradiction in terms: put the two branches of it together the desire is a desire to see the same thing be and not be at the same place and the same time - a desire that the same thing shall and shall not have place at the same time.
  • Title: [[clx. 366] 1822 July 9 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 366]

    1822 July 9

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Defamation no

    ground for suppressing

    it or depriving it of Evidence

    Add Suppression of true instruction by the suppression of every thing obtainable in the character /[...?]/ of former times

    ? Diffusion of unjust defamation no sufficient reason for diminishing the censorial power of the Public Opinion Tribunal by restrictions on the press.

    In the case of private defamation the mischief stares every one in the face. But along with it is mixt much good and to this good it is not customary for [...?] /men/ to appear sensible /men do not in general seem sensible/

    To take the strongest case - the case in which if in any the evil would appear /be/ pure - the case where the misconduct imputed is by the imputer known not to have had place: the imputation in a word known to be /have been/ knowingly and wilfully false Here the effects of the first order, the uneasiness experienced by the individual to whom the conduct /misconduct/ is imputed, are evil: the effects of the 2d order, the apprehension excited in other persons at large - the apprehension of being made sufferers by similar [...?] from the same or other sources, are also evil But by the contemplation of the evil suffered in these two ways by groundless imputation, the attention of men is directed to and the more firmly fixed upon the like suffering as being more or less likely to be produced by true imputations: and, in this way accordingly addition is made to these fears - fears of punishment at the hands of the Public Opinion Tribunal - by which misconduct in general misconduct in most of its shapes is repressed: for that which is too obvious and too certain and too obvious to pass unnoticed is that by being guilty of misconduct in any shape a man is in a greater degree exposed to disrepute in respect of it than he would be if innocent. A man if he knew of an article of misconduct of which his intended victim had been really guilty proofs of his guilt more or less satisfactory being in existence would never think of preferring a false /ungrounded/ accusation in any shape to that same well grounded.

    Not that currency knowingly allowed to false and unjust imputation are in any degree as such conducive and necessary to the repression of the misconduct that would have had place had the imputation been well grounded

    Not that the antipathy against inventor and common circulator of such false imputation is not well grounded: not that they ought not to be subjected to legal punishment in so far as sufficient proof can be obtained.

    All that is meant is - that all imputations grounded and ungrounded together ought to be suppressed without distinction, for the more effectual suppression of ungrounded ones. The Public-Opinion Tribunal with its useful effects ought not to be suppressed for the single benefit of more effectually preventing the pernicious ones.
  • Title: [[clx. 360] 1822 July 25 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 360]

    1822 July 25

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities

    5 Moral Counterforce

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Evidence etc

    Such is /are/ the facilities which the nature of the case affords for the encountering of it when the shape in which it presents itself is thus determinate.

    Now suppose it in the merely oral shape. Being refutation proof being proof against exposure, the great probability is that even in its first shape it is false. It is either a compleat fabrication in the whole texture of it, if there be a groundwork of truth belonging to it an embroidery of falshood is added - of falshood such as suits the sinister purpose whatever it be. But how so ever mischievous and injurious this first is naturally its least mischievous and most /least/ injurious shape: and even in this shape it is not capable of being encountered. From the first mouth it passes on to another and in the second mouth further mischievousness further injuriousness with or without consciousnces and intentionality are naturally added. Thus it travels on from mouth to mouth it travels /rolls/ on adding to its mischievousness and injuriousness at every stage; to the number of the stages there is no limit: and at no one of them can it ever be encountered