date

[clx. 361] 1822 July 25 Constitut
[clx. 361]

1822 July 25

Constitut. Code Rationale

Securities

5 Moral Counterforce

Public Opinion Tribunal

Evidence etc

A circumstance which has a natural tendency to provoke falshood and through falshood, injury evil to the prejudice of the government by which the restraint /restriction/ is imposed, is the resentment which the restriction itself imposes: a resentment than which nothing can in any case be better grounded or more just. Where oppression is exercised and there is no other remedy, no other defence against it is afforded by the nature of the case, falshood if not justifiable is at any rate comparatively excusable. Of every such restriction the effect and object is to secure efficiency and impunity to oppression and depredation: to oppression in every shape, the worst shapes imaginable not excepted. From no course that can be taken by the endeavour to put an end to such an instrument of oppression can any evil be produced comparable /equal/ to the evil included /produced/ by the application of this instrument of oppression, if the application be effective.

To the encountering of such endeavours by appropriate falshood the grand objection is /are in general/ that it will be unnecessary /needless/: for seldom are they emplyed but for the purpose of concealing enormities, the correct statement of which would suffice for the infamizing of the rulers /oppressors/ without the addition of any thing that is not true: and that, in proportion as the falshood comes to be discovered, the discovery casts reproach upon the heads of those concerned in the propagation of it, and discredit upon such reproachful imputations as are true.

2. Another objection is that by one falshood /false report/ detected and brought home to the author or any person concerned in the dissemination of it, while conscious of the falshood his own reputation is /may be/ so damaged, that from his mouth or pen what is true will not be taken for such.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[clx. 360] 1822 July 25 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 360]

    1822 July 25

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities

    5 Moral Counterforce

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Evidence etc

    Such is /are/ the facilities which the nature of the case affords for the encountering of it when the shape in which it presents itself is thus determinate.

    Now suppose it in the merely oral shape. Being refutation proof being proof against exposure, the great probability is that even in its first shape it is false. It is either a compleat fabrication in the whole texture of it, if there be a groundwork of truth belonging to it an embroidery of falshood is added - of falshood such as suits the sinister purpose whatever it be. But how so ever mischievous and injurious this first is naturally its least mischievous and most /least/ injurious shape: and even in this shape it is not capable of being encountered. From the first mouth it passes on to another and in the second mouth further mischievousness further injuriousness with or without consciousnces and intentionality are naturally added. Thus it travels on from mouth to mouth it travels /rolls/ on adding to its mischievousness and injuriousness at every stage; to the number of the stages there is no limit: and at no one of them can it ever be encountered
  • Title: [[clx. 403] 1823 Jany. 22 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 403]

    1823 Jany. 22

    Constitut. Code

    II. Constitutive

    Ch.5. Constitutive

    Universal dislocative -why

    Corruption analysed

    15. Pub. Opin. Trib. insufficient

    Of the Public Opinion Tribunal the two great and between them all-comprehensive Sections - the democratical and the aristocratical - have already been brought to view: members of the democratical the subject many; members of the aristocratical, the ruling and otherwise /by other means/ most influential few. To the aggregate interest of the subject many, misrule, with the depredation oppression and dissipation involved in it is prejudicial: corruption therefore as being the immediate efficient cause, and prime and universally applying /operating/ instrument of misrule. But to the aggregate interest /the particular and sinister interest/ of the ruling few, misrule, and therefore corruption is beneficial, at any rate in their sure and constant view of the matter by which every thing they say or do is determined: so far then from opposing the progress of corruption in its progress /operations/, they will of course do every thing to promote it. It is in a word their instrument, kept in operation by them for their own purposes.

    True it is that of this aristocratical Section a Sub section there commonly /always/ is by whom in appearance opposition to the work of corruption will naturally be maintained. These are This section is composed of such of those corruptionists as /who/ being such in desire and expectation only, and not being in connection with those in possession, will in this way as in all others be /keep at all times/ making war with them, which they can no otherwise do than by accusing them at the bar of the Public Opinion Tribunal, and using their endeavours to draw down upon them the discontent and resentment of the people. But in no such apparent endeavour ever have they or in the nature of the case ever can they be sincere: were the desires on this occasion crowned with success the object and foundation of their own hopes would, the greatest part of it be destroyed. From any exertions they can make, no such catastrophe however have they to fear. For as hath above been demonstrated, for the extirpation /exclusion/ and even for the diminution of the evil, prohibition and punishment are compleatly and necessarily unavailing: so that they may in this way /by this [...?], make sham attacks without [...?] and always /[...?]/ without any the least ground for apprehension of success
  • Title: [[clx. 367] 1822 July 9 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 367]

    1822 July 9

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Defamation no ground

    for suppression etc

    That which a man in whose instance an /the/ imputation is false, is as nothing /little/ in comparison of what the man suffers in whose instance the same imputation is true.

    Accordingly the marks of vexation exhibited will naturally be in the same proportion: the intensity of the desire manifested for suppression and vengeance

    To see imputed to him a misdeed by which in proportion as his having committed it is believed, the esteem and respect that would otherwise be entertained /felt/ for him will be diminished, is doubtless an uneasy sight: a sight productive of uneasiness proportioned to the degree in which the diminution of respect will be produced if the imputation be believed to be true, and the extent to which such belief has place.

    There will be in any case the trouble of calling upon the defamer for his proofs: and if it be a case in which the circumstances admitt of the defamers giving an air of probability to the charge, viz. by means of circumstantial evidence, the trouble of encountering the probative force of such circumstantial evidence by arguments, and counter evidence or both. Note however at bottom[?] of all this trouble will remain for consolation the consciousness of innocence

    Look now to the case of him in whose instance the imputation is true.