[clx. 392]

1822 Oct. 23

Constitut. Code

III. Rationale or II. Exposition

Ch.3. Constitutive

Publ. Opin. Tribunal

?. Public Opinion Tribunal - course to be taken for applying its controuling power.

\ZA\ This belongs likewise to Despotism dangerous to itself - Means of self-preservation in the proper hand

Course proper to be taken by the Public Opinion Tribunal, considered as a controuling power /authority/ to misrule and thence by every individual considered in his capacity of a member of it

Whatsoever moral considerations - notions of moral obligation - should lead /urge/ /engage/ /induce/ a man to abstain from acts injurious to individuals, or to the community in the aggregate, and to oppose himself to acts of the like nature /tendency/ on the part of other individuals, or of foreigners, considered in the character of enemies, should urge him to the like conduct as against the correspondent acts of misrule on the part of the government, and as against the form and system of government which gives birth to them: So much with regard to direction:- [...?] as to force and energy. In the case of the public wrong it ought to be to what it is in the case of the private wrong as the mischief done by the public wrong is to do by the private wrong. Apply this to honesty, generosity, courage etc
Similar Items
  • Title: [[clx. 383] 1822 Oct. 17 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 383]

    1822 Oct. 17

    Constitut. Code

    Securities

    Public Opin Trib

    Sections Aristoc and Democrat

    1. Interests

    Sanctioning power.

    In speaking of the Public Opinion Tribunal or say the Tribunal of the social sanction that is to say /composed in its power and influence of/ the power and the influence of the members of it in the character of a Security against Mis-rule, one observation /considerable/ presents an irresistible claim to attention in the first instance. This is that in the bosom of it are individuals in no small multitude, against whom rather than for whom the need of whatever security it is in the power of such a tribunal to afford, has place that is to say the Members /individuals/ of whom the Aristocracy of the country whatsoever be that country, the Aristocracy, in all its shapes and divisions /sub-sections/. Of those sections, or at least the principal of them it is necessary that a clear conception be obtained and kept constantly in view. In most countries, and for example in England in particular They may be thus enumerated. \ZA\ Here insert them
  • Title: [[clx. 368] 1822 July 16 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 368]

    1822 July 16

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities Counterforce

    5. Moral responsibility

    Public Opinion Tribunal

    Remuneratory power

    ?. Applications proposed of the remuneratory portion of the power of the Public Opinion Tribunal.

    As the Public Opinion Tribunal by the counterforce it applies to /with which by its punitive force /power/ it antagonizes with/ the powers of the government it /the Public Opinion Tribunal/ contributes to keep it in check and keep its course within the path marked out /indicated/ by the greatest happiness principle thereby operating as a security for appropriate moral aptitude on the conduct of rulers as such, so may it in no inconsiderable degree by its remuneratory power.

    Accordingly on several occasions, the use here proposed to be made of this instrument of benficial /good government/ will present themselves to view
  • Title: [[clx. 351] 1822 July 14 Constitut]
    Description: [clx. 351]

    1822 July 14

    Constitut. Code Rationale

    Securities Counterforces

    4 Legal Responsibility

    5. Moral Responsibility

    Evidence etc its necessity

    Against such misdeeds, whether by the state of the law put or not put upon the footing of crime, against such misdeeds in the government /governors/ their instruments, favorites and dependents their misdoers /authors/ or protectors, the legal sanction with the corresponding legal tribunals /judicatories/ afford /refuse/ of course no /all/ redress: against all such misdeeds whatsoever redress if any is afforded, it is by the popular or moral sanction with its Public-Opinion Tribunal that it must be afforded.

    To /An/ endeavour whatsoever be the means to destroy or to diminish the force of the Public Opinion Tribunal /weaken this counterforce/ is therefore an endeavour to give encrease to misrule with the misery of which it is productive to give encrease to injury in all shapes at the hands of individuals with the misery in all shapes of which it is productive - an endeavour to diminish the quantity of happiness in the community to encrease the quantity of suffering in the community. But, except what regards the quantity of the happiness or misery /suffering/ in question this is the worst that can be said of any the foulest crime imaginable whatsoever it be that experience observation or imagination can hold up to view