1818 Jan 5

Not Paul

III. Doctrine

Ch. Asceticism

§. 2. Females slighted

How mean must be the opinion, entertained of the attractions peculiar to her sex, by

a /the/ female in whose eyes punishment is necessary to secure their prevalence?

 Here Quote Dum. for the uses of a wife.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1818 Jan 3 Not Paul III. Doctrine]
    Description: 1818 Jan 3

    Not Paul

    III. Doctrine

    Ch. Asceticism

    §. 2. Females slighted

    Upon a closer inspection it will be seen that from the eccentric propensity the

    influence of the female sex has more to gain than to lose.

    Rival compared with rival much more formidable to the wedded female is a person of

    her own sex than any person of the opposite sex can ever be. The space in the field

    of life to which the eccentric propensity commonly applies itself is extremely

    limited /narrow/. In the days of imperial Rome, when all matters of this sort were

    settled by established custom, and where a seraglio /harem/ of the male sex formed an

    ordinary part of the establishment of a man of rank and opulence, no sooner had a

    member of such a fraternity /an establishment/ passed his twentieth year that he

    passed into a particular class distinguished by a special appellative exoletus superannuated he was put upon the superannuated list.

    Thus ephemeral were the attractions of the male in the eyes of the male: whereas in

    these same eyes the duration of those of the female has as every one knows no bounds.

    It is in the place of the venal female only and not in the place of her of whose

    charms possession is not to be obtained on any other terms than those of a union made

    permanent by law that those of the male venal or not venal were ever seen to

    occupy.
  • Title: [1818 Jan 3 Not Paul III. Doctrine]
    Description: 1818 Jan 3

    Not Paul

    III. Doctrine

    Ch. Asceticism

    §. 2. Females slighted

    4. Female more powerful rival than [...?] to Female.

    5. [...?] of Rome. Population near overflowing—Females sufficiently served.

    2. In Italy though proscribed by the laws the eccentric propensity prevails to such

    a degree as to be gratified not only without danger but without shame. Yet in that

    same Italy the female sex governs with a degree of importance /ascendancy/ beyond any

    thing /what/ exemplified in Britain where the propensity is so rare or even in

    Ireland where it is scarce known. (a)

    In France the eccentric propensity is much less rare than in Great Britain, and

    where it has place is a subject not of horror but of joke /jest/. Yet in France the

    ascendancy of the female sex is more conspicuous than in Britain or Ireland: the

    worship much more zealous as well as conspicuous. Few political intrigues in which

    females do not bear a part:

    (a)

    In the course of a conversation I had once with the late Abbé Fontana, he informed

    me /I was informed by him/ that in all the hospitals he was acquainted with a part of

    the population was commonly composed of male children in whose instance, by want of

    proportions, laceration had been produced. This man /The Abbé, known by the public at

    large by his experimental works in Chemistry and Pathology/ had been an eminent

    Physician and was at that time Director General of the Museum at Florence.
  • Title: [1818 Jan y 3 Not Paul III.]
    Description: 1818 Jan y 3

    Not Paul

    III. Doctrine

    Ch. Asceticism

    §. 2. Females slighted

    II. Second of the abovementioned supposed or alledged mischiefs Deterioration of the

    lot of the female part of the species.

    Of any objection /charge/ capable of receiving expression from any such form of

    words as the above, it should be remarked in the first place that it is but a charge

    hanging in the air: to be landed on terra firma it will

    require to be particularized by a designation of the pleasure in this or that

    particular shape excluded, or pain in this or that particular shape introduced.

    Be it what it may in other respects what it may, in respect of its ground

    /foundation/ it stands upon the same hollow /extravagant/ and untenable ground as the

    former supposition /charge/: viz. the general predominance of the desire /appetite/

    in its eccentric shape over the same appetite in its ordinary shape: and not only the

    existence of that predominance, but its existence /prevalence/ to an extent analogous

    in its extravagance to that spoken of in the abovementioned /former/ instances.