1
results found in
30 ms
Page 1
of 1
1818 Jan 14
Not Paul
III Doctrine
Ch Asceticism
1 Other Remedies
§ Divorce by consent
§ Divorce by consent.
This is the remedy for the evils of an ill-assorted marriage the complicated the too
infinitely diversified the boundless mass of evil liable to result from / be among
the fruits of / an ill-assorted marriage. A / a / source of evil so copious could not
be left unimproved or unprotected by the dæmon of asceticism.
That the union of one man to one woman and that for life, except in case of
dissolution by consent, is of this species of contract the most natural mode as the
phrase is that the nature / circumstance / state // of the case admitts of: that in
the most extensively prevalent state of things, it is the mode the most likely to be
beneficial to both parties taken together―the most likely to be thought to be so―and
thence the most likely to be adopted, has been shewn by Bentham: [Ref.] that to the putting the matter upon the most
beneficial footing that the nature of the case admitts of has also and on the same
occasion been rendered apparent by the same hand. [Ref.]
What / That which / on this occasion can not to a certain extent be compelled by
law, as far as the power / efficiency / of punishment, contending with the
strongest MS ‘most strongest’.
appetite to those on which the preservation / life / of the individual depends under
the greatest difficulty of enforcement extends is the Sentence breaks off.
to any extent be compelled by law is the performance / rendering / of the
characteristic services to the female by an unwelcome male: that which to a certain
extent though that happily an extremely / a considerably / limited one is the loss of
those same services to both parties, by the obstacles opposed to the obtainment of
its gratification from other sources: and this is the object to which the dæmon on
this occasion the dæmon of asceticism directs his […?]
Similar Items
-
Title: [1818 Jan 14 Not Paul III Doctrine]Description: 1818 Jan 14 Not Paul III Doctrine Ch Asceticism 2 Divorce by consent No tenable ground for his inhibition in this any more than in any of the preceding cases can he find in any of the / the / acts or discourses―in a word in the religion of Jesus. Dissolution of the marriage by the sole will of the male alone, no: on / to / every such act of tyranny and injustice he has in the clearest character imprinted the stamp of prohibition. The will of the male alone would have in this case for its source the interest of the male alone: the interest of the strongest to which the interest of the weakest of the parties would thus be sacrificed: such is / thus saith / the law of utility: thus saith the law of Jesus. JB footnote (in pencil) at this point: ‘Quote a passage’.
-
Title: [1818 Jany 11 Contents for Vol. III]Description: 1818 Jany 11 Contents for Vol. III. 12mo Vol. III. Doctrine Part I Part I Asceticism considered in itself repugnancy to Happiness and Virtue Ch. 1. Asceticism what — mimical to Happiness and Virtue. its Mischiefs Mischievous effects produced by it. §. 1. Asceticism what —its opposition to Utility— their relation to Happiness, pleasure and pain. §. 2. Pursuit of pleasure. Limits set to it by Virtue— Asceticism is Vice. §. 3. Pretence employed by Asceticism. Ch. 2 Asceticism continued. War made by Asceticism against the pleasures of sense — its groundlessness. Ch. 3. Asceticism continued. War made by Asceticism against the eccentric pleasures of the bed —its groundlessness causes and inconsistencies. §. 1. — its Groundlessness considered in a general view. §. 2. —its causes. §. 3. —Groundless charges employed. 1. Supposed injury to population. §. 4. — 2. Imaginary deterioration of the lot of the female sex. §. 5. —3. Imaginary injury to personal security. §. 6. Inconsistencies in the war thus made. §. 7. of Peculiar asperity of the vituperation lavished upon this mode these modes — its causes Ch. 4 Asceticism continued. Evils produced by the pleasures of the bed in the ordinary mode — Remedies to those interdicted by Asceticism. §. 1. 1. Intercourse without cohabitation 2 Cohabitation without marriage. 3. Marriage polygamous on both sides 4. Intercourse with precautions. 5. Voluntary Abortion. §. 2. Power of breeding up or not during early infancy.— §. 3. 6 Divorce by consent. Ch. 5 Asceticism continued. Suicide, the all comprehensive remedy against all evils — Groundlessness of the interdiction put upon it by Asceticism. Ch. 6 Asceticism continued. Happiness and Virtue, how diminished by Asceticism in an indirect way — Useful and genuine obligations elbowed out by spurious ones. Ch. 14 or 8. How asceticism, not being part of the religion of Jesus came to be received as such non-Ascetic sects extinguished by the Ascetic. §. 1. How Asceticism —&c. §. 2. Non-Ascetic &c. Part II. Asceticism is formsno part of the religion of Jesus. Ch. 7 or 1 Asceticism as above uniformly discountenanced nowhere countenanced by Jesus. §. 1. Negative proof — For the condemnation passed on Asceticism no warrant can be found in the Gospels. Proof Bishop Gastrell’s Institute. Ch. 8 or 2 §. 1. Positive proof from the discourses of Jesus 1. Eating and drinking with sinners justified. Things entering the body defile not Mosaic law 2. Fasts scorned then Mosaic law abolished. 3. Sabbath scorned. 4. Perfume accepted. 5 Samaritan woman cohabiting without marriage unreproved. 6. Adultery tolerated. 7 Harlots declared to go to heaven before Pharisees. Ch. 9 or 3 3. Presumptive proof from his practice, the practice of Jesus. §. 1. Introduction. §. 2. Intercourse with Mary Magdalene and other females. Paul’s notion respecting it. explanation of it §. 3. Mary Magdalene — no warrant for sup posing her a prostitute. §. 4. Origin of the supposition of her being a prostitute. Asceticism is formsno part of the religion of Jesus. Ch. 10 or 4. The condemnation passed upon these forms not any part of the religion of Jesus. §. 1. In the allusion made by Jesus to the destruction of the ill-famed cities no condemnation of the eccentric pleasures of the bed is contained. §. 2. The propensity to the eccentric pleasure of the bed, when reaped by consent is not the reported cause of the destruction of the ill famed cities. Ch. 11 or 5. Condemnation passed on the eccentric pleasures of the bed in the Mosaic law — it had its source in an illusion of the fancy. Ch. 12. or 6 Disregard Little regard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions of the eccentric pleasures of the bed. §. 1. Story of the Young Levite and his Concubine Judges XIX §. 2 Story of Jonathan and David §. 3. Houses of resort for this purpose protected under the Kings §. 4. In the discourses of the Prophets no condemnation of theses pleasures is contained. Ch. 13 or 7. The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus? §. 1. Introduction. §. 2. Intercourse of Jesus with the Apostle John §. 3. Intercourse of Jesus with the stripling in the loose attire. §. 4. Jesus and Socrates compared in this respect.
-
Title: [1817 Dec r 30 Not Paul III]Description: 1817 Dec r 30 Not Paul III. Doctrine. Ch. Asceticism §.1. Asceticism Utility happiness pleasure pain The Manicheans have made to themselves one mischievous God—an evil principle; Man is to himself an evil principle. The dæmon of asceticism is the evil principle of a Manichean Part III. Doctrine. I. Asceticism. Ch. Paul’s false doctrines. I. Asceticism, injunction of Ascetic practices. Asceticism mischievous—not by the principles or practice of Jesus. Positions to be proved. Ch. 1. Of Asceticism—Asceticism inimical to happiness and virtue—mischievous effects produced by it §.1. Asceticism what—its opposition to utility—their relation happiness, pleasure and pain. Of the doctrines above noticed as having been taught by Paul though they had not bee taught by Jesus and as belonging therefore to a religion of Paul’s own invention say /call it/ for example Paulism, we; come now to that which stands last-mentioned, and for the discussion of which the word Asceticism has been /is here/ adopted. Of /Concerning/ the doctrine of Asceticism three positions have presented themselves as demonstrable viz. 1. That asceticism is to the whole extent of it a doctrine purely and incontestably mischievous. 2. That neither in any of the acts of sayings or acts of Jesus is any countenance whatsoever lent to it: but on the contrary, much and uniform discountenance. 3. That to a great extent and on many occasions it has been taught by Paul and that great zeal /anxiety/ has been manifested by him for the enforcement of it. 4. That to Paul and Paul alone this doctrine is indebted for the influence which down to this time has been exercised by it.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1