1
results found in
152 ms
Page 1
of 1
[Front page of full-folio wrapper, very torn and damaged]
Packet IV.
1817.
Not Paul.
III. Doctrine.
Asceticism for Vol. III
to be published not till
afterwards.
[Before folio 215]
Not Paul Part III Doctrine 1 Asceticism
Ch. 1. Paul’s false Doctrines: viz. 1. Injunction of Ascetic practices - Asceticism -
its mischievousness - its want of sanction from the principles or practice of Jesus.
Positions to be proved.
[Around folios 215 to 224]
Not Paul III. Doctrine Asceticism
Ch. 1. Principle of Utility - its dictates in relation to pleasure
§. 1. Principle of Utility what - its relation to pleasure and pain
§. 2. Senses - their double function
§. 3. Principle of Utility - its dictates in relation to pleasure.
[Around folios 225 to 226]
Not Paul
III. Doctrine Asceticism
Ch. 2 Utility
§. 2. Senses - their double function.
[Around folios 227 to 233]
Not Paul III. Doctrine Asceticism
Ch. 2 Utility.
§ 3 Utility - its dictates in relation to pleasure
[Around folios 234 to 238]
Ch 2 Asceticism. what -
§. 1. Asceticism - what - asceticism restrictive and afflictive - its relation to
Happiness, Pleasure and Pain
[Before folio 239]
III Doctrine.
Ch. 3 Asceticism continued 2 o
War made by Asceticism against the eccentric pleasures of the bed - its groundlessness -
its causes - its inconsistencies
§. 1 its groundlessness considered in a general view
§. 2. its causes
§. 3. Groundless charges employed: 1. supposed injury to population
§. 4. — 2. Imaginary deterioration of the lot of the female sex.
§. 5 — 3. Imaginary injury to personal security - Blackstone examined
§. 6. Inconsistencies in the war thus made
§. 7. Causes of the peculiar asperity of the vituperation lavished upon this mode.
[Around folios 239 to 245]
III Doctrine
Ch. Asceticism
§. 2. Pursuit of pleasure - limits set to it by Virtue
Asceticism is Vice.
[Around folios 246 to 257]
Not Paul III. Doctrine Asceticism
Ch. 3. Asceticism - its mischievousness and absurdity false arguments in support of it.
§. 1. Asceticism what - restrictive and positive - its relation to Happiness, pleasure
and pain
§. 2. Pursuit of pleasure - Limits set to it by Virtue i.e. by Self-regarding Prudence,
and effective Benevolence - Asceticism is Vice
§. 3. Happiness and Virtue how injured by Asceticism in an indirect way.
Genuine and useful obligations elbowed out by spurious and mischievous ones
§. 4. Inconsistency inseparable from Asceticism
§. 5. Preaching in support of Asceticism mischievous
§. 6 Pretences employed by Asceticism for the interdiction of pleasure
[Around folios 246 to 247]
III. Doctrine.
Ch. 2 Asceticism
§ 3 Happiness and Virtue, how injured /diminished/ by Asceticism in an indirect way -
Genuine and useful obligations elbowed out by mischievous and spurious ones.
[Around folios 248 to 253]
Not Paul III. Doctrine - Asceticism
Ch
§. 4 Inconsistency inseparable from /essential to/ Asceticism.
[Around folios 254 to 257]
III Doctrine Asceticism
Ch. 2
§. 5.[?] Preaching in support of Asceticism - its mischievousness.
[Around folios 258 to 265b]
III. Doctrine
Ch 2 Asceticism.
§. 6. Pretences employed by Asceticism for the interdiction of pleasure
[Around folios 266 to 269]
III. Doctrine.
Ch. 2 Asceticism continued 1 o
§ War made by Asceticism against the pleasures of sense in general - its groundlessness.
[Around folios 270 to 272]
III. Doctrine
Ch Asceticism continued
War made by Asceticism upon the eccentric pleasures of the bed - its groundlessness -
its causes - its inconsistencies.
§. 1. - its groundlessness
[Before folio 273 (single sheet, unfolded)]
III. Doctrine
Ch. Asceticism continued 2 o
§. 1. War made by Asceticism against the eccentric pleasures of the bed - its causes -
[Around folios 314 to 322]
III. Doctrine.
Ch. 4. Asceticism continued 3 o
Evils produced by the pleasures of the bed in this ordinary mode
Remedies to them interdicted by Asceticism.
§. 1. Idem
[Around folios 323 to 335]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 5. Asceticism continued - Suicide, the all-comprehensive remedy against all evils -
Groundlessness of the interdiction put upon it by Asceticism.
[Around folios 339 to 340]
Sex.
Ch. 12.
Aspect of Jesus towards the irregularities of the sexual appetite.
[Around folios 341 to 347]
Ch. 7. or 1. II Doctrine
In Jesus no Asceticism
§. 1. Negative proof. No ascetic doctrine ascribed in any one of the Gospels to Jesus -
Paul the only authority referred to for any such doctrines. Witness Bishop Gastrel in
his Institutes
[Around folios 348 to 352]
III. Doctrine Part II
Ch 8 or 2
Asceticism
Proof positive from discourse continued.
§.§. 1 Fasts scorned. Occasion hence taken to declare the utter abolition of the Mosaic
Law.
[Around folios 362 to 367]
III Doctrine
Ch.
Asceticism
Proof positive from discourse
§§ 2 1. Asceticism in regard to the pleasure of the table condemned - Occasion hence
taken to declare the utter abolition of the Mosaic Law
[Around folios 368 to 370]
Ch. 8. or 2
II. Doctrine
In Jesus no Asceticism.
Positive proof from discourse
§. 3. Sabbath scorned.
[Before folio 371]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 8. or 2. Part II In Jesus no Asceticism
§. 1. The Mosaic law including all its asceticism, abrogated on the occasion of the
condemnation passed in Pharisean[?] fasts
§. 2. Condemnation passed on the Mosaic asceticism in regard to Meats the pleasures of
the Table.
§. 3. Condemnation passed on Mosaic Asceticism in regard to the Sabbath
§. 4. Perfume accepted
§. 5. Condemnation passed on Mosaic asceticism in regard to pleasures of the bed 1. by
Liberation of the adulteress
§. 6. — 2. Samaritan women cohabiting without marriage are improved
§. 7. — 3. Harlots declared to go to heaven before Pharisees.
[Around folio 371]
Ch. 8 or 2
III Doctrine
In Jesus no Asceticism
Positive proof from discourse
§. 4 Pretious perfume accepted and approved.
[Around folios 372a to 380]
Ch 8. or 2.
II Doctrine
In Jesus no Asceticism.
§. 5. Positive proof from discourse continued
3 Liberation of the adulteress
[Around folios 381 to 383]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 8. or 2.
Asceticism
Proof positive from discourse
§. 7. 3. Harlots declared to go to heaven before Pharisees
[Around folios 384 to 390]
Ch. 9. or 3
III Doctrine
Ch. In Jesus no Asceticism
Presumptive proof from his practice
§. 1. 1. Introduction
[Around folios 391 to 394]
Ch. 9 or 3 II. Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
III Presumptive proof from practice
§. 2. Intercourse with Mary Magdalene and other females.
[Around folios 395 to 410]
III Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
Ch. 9. or 3
Presumptive proof from his practice
§. 1. Introduction
§. 2 Intercourse with Mary Magdalene and other females
Paul’s notice of it
§. 3 Mary Magdalene - No warrant for supposing her a Prostitute.
§. 4 Origin of the supposition of her being a prostitute
[Around folios 395 to 410]
Ch.
II. Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
*5 III. Presumptive proof from practice
§ 3 Mary Magdalene no prostitute
Post off to Appendix or Omitt?
[Before folio 411]
III Doctrine Part II
Ch. 10 or 4
In Jesus no Asceticism
Eccentric pleasures of the bed - the condemnation passed on those forms not any part of
the religion of Jesus
§. 1. In the allusion made by Jesus to the destruction of the ill-famed cities no
condemnation of the eccentric pleasures of the bed are contained
§. 2. The propensity to the eccentric pleasures of the bed, when reaped by consent, was
not the reported cause of the destruction of the ill-famed cities.
§. 3. With the exception of Paul in no Epistles of the Apostles is this or any other
ascetic condemnation contained.
[Around folios 431 to 433]
Ch. 10 or 4
III. Doctrine
Asceticism
§. 2 The propensity to the eccentric pleasures of the bed when reaped by consent, not
the reported cause of the consumption of the ill-famed cities
[Around folios 434 to 443]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 10 or 4
In Jesus no Asceticism.
§. 3. In the Epistles of the other Apostles no ascetic condemnation or precepts are
contained.
[Around folios 444 to 453]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 10. or 4
In Jesus no Asceticism
§. 1 By /In/ the allusions made by Jesus to the destruction of the consumed cities no
condemnation of the eccentric pleasures of the bed is contained
[Around folios 444 to 453]
Ch. 11 or 5 III. Doctrine
Ch
Asceticism
Condemnation passed in the Mosaic law on the eccentric pleasures of the bed - it had its
source in an illusion of the fancy.
[Before folio 454]
III. Doctrine
Part II
Ch. 12 or 6.
In Jesus no Asceticism
Irr.
Ch 12 or 6. Disregard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions against the eccentric pleasures
of the bed.
§. 1. Story of the Young Levite and his Concubine, Judges XIX.
§. 2. Story of Jonathan and David.
§. 3. Houses of resort for this purpose protected under the Kings.
§. 4? In the discourses of the Prophets no condemnation of these pleasures is contained.
To be inserted here or by itself?
[Around folios 454 to 456]
III. Doctrine Part II
Ch. 12 or 6
In Jesus no Asceticism Irr.
Ch. 7. Disregard shewn to Mosaic prohibitions against the eccentric pleasures of the bed
demonstrated /continued/
§ L[?] 1. Story of the Young Levite and his Concubine
[verso]
III Doctrine
Ch.
Asceticism
Proof positive continued -
Moses repealed
[Around folios 457 to 461]
Ch. 12 or 6
III. Doctrine Part II
Irr.
In Jesus no Asceticism
§. Disregard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions against the eccentric pleasures of the
bed.
§.§. 2 2. Story of Jonathan and David.
[Around folios 462 to 463]
Ch. 12 or 6
III. Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
§. Disregard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions against the eccentric pleasures of the bed
continued.
§.§. 3. 3. Houses of resort for this purpose protected under the Kings.
[Around folios 464 to 482]
III. Doctrine Part II
Ch. 12 or 6.
In Jesus no Asceticism
§. Disregard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions against the eccentric pleasures of the bed
continued
§ 4 In the discourses of the Prophets no condemnation of the propensity in question is
contained.
Insert in the body or post off to the Appendix
[Around folios 475 to 482]
Ch. 13 or 7
III Doctrine
In Jesus no Asceticism
The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus?
§. 1. 1. Introduction
[Before folio 485]
Ch. 13 or 7.
III Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus.
2. Intercourse with the Apostle John.
[Around folios 487 to 499]
Ch 14 or 8
III. Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus.
§. 3. Intercourse with the stripling in the loose attire
[Before folio 500]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 14 or 8.
In Jesus no Asceticism
Irreg.
§. 4. Jesus and Socrates compared in this respect
[Around folios 503 to 507]
III. Doctrine
Ch. 14 or 8.
Asceticism
§ 1. How asceticism not being part of the religion of Jesus came to be received as such.
This after the Chapter on Paul’s motives for introducing
Asceticism.
§. 2 ( To be written Jan. y 24. 1818. Non-Ascetic Sects extinguished
by the Ascetic.
[Before folio 502]
Ch. 13 or 7.
III. Doctrine Part II
In Jesus no Asceticism
The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus.
§. 1. Introduction
§. 2. Intercourse of Jesus with the Apostle John ‘whom Jesus loved’.
§. 3. Intercourse of Jesus with the stripling in the loose attire.
§. 4. Jesus and Socrates compared in this respect.
[verso]
Jug. True.
1. Pr.
Ch.
[verso again]
Ch. 7.
v. Paul’s Miracles.
[Around folios 508 to 519]
Not Paul. III Doctrine.
Ch. 15. Relation of Paul’s Doctrines, Practice, and Motives to Asceticism
§. 1. Paul’s Motives for the application of asceticism to the pleasures of the bed.
[After folio 523]
Not Paul
III. Doctrine
Asceticism
Ch. 15 Relation of Paul’s Doctrines, Practice, and Motives, to Asceticism
§. 2. Paul’s Motives for not including the pleasures of the table in his condemnation of
the pleasures of the bed
§ 3 Paul’s condemnation of the eccentric pleasures of the bed
§ 4 Paul’s practice in relation to the pleasures of the bed.
[After folio 523]
Ch
III Doctrine
Ch. Relation of Paul &c to Asceticism
§. 1 Paul’s Motives for not including the pleasures of the table in his condemnation of
the pleasures of the bed.
[Back page of full-folio wrapper]
1817.
Bit Oayk,
IIII. Doctrine.
Asceticism.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1818 Jany 11 Contents for Vol. III]Description: 1818 Jany 11 Contents for Vol. III. 12mo Vol. III. Doctrine Part I Part I Asceticism considered in itself repugnancy to Happiness and Virtue Ch. 1. Asceticism what — mimical to Happiness and Virtue. its Mischiefs Mischievous effects produced by it. §. 1. Asceticism what —its opposition to Utility— their relation to Happiness, pleasure and pain. §. 2. Pursuit of pleasure. Limits set to it by Virtue— Asceticism is Vice. §. 3. Pretence employed by Asceticism. Ch. 2 Asceticism continued. War made by Asceticism against the pleasures of sense — its groundlessness. Ch. 3. Asceticism continued. War made by Asceticism against the eccentric pleasures of the bed —its groundlessness causes and inconsistencies. §. 1. — its Groundlessness considered in a general view. §. 2. —its causes. §. 3. —Groundless charges employed. 1. Supposed injury to population. §. 4. — 2. Imaginary deterioration of the lot of the female sex. §. 5. —3. Imaginary injury to personal security. §. 6. Inconsistencies in the war thus made. §. 7. of Peculiar asperity of the vituperation lavished upon this mode these modes — its causes Ch. 4 Asceticism continued. Evils produced by the pleasures of the bed in the ordinary mode — Remedies to those interdicted by Asceticism. §. 1. 1. Intercourse without cohabitation 2 Cohabitation without marriage. 3. Marriage polygamous on both sides 4. Intercourse with precautions. 5. Voluntary Abortion. §. 2. Power of breeding up or not during early infancy.— §. 3. 6 Divorce by consent. Ch. 5 Asceticism continued. Suicide, the all comprehensive remedy against all evils — Groundlessness of the interdiction put upon it by Asceticism. Ch. 6 Asceticism continued. Happiness and Virtue, how diminished by Asceticism in an indirect way — Useful and genuine obligations elbowed out by spurious ones. Ch. 14 or 8. How asceticism, not being part of the religion of Jesus came to be received as such non-Ascetic sects extinguished by the Ascetic. §. 1. How Asceticism —&c. §. 2. Non-Ascetic &c. Part II. Asceticism is formsno part of the religion of Jesus. Ch. 7 or 1 Asceticism as above uniformly discountenanced nowhere countenanced by Jesus. §. 1. Negative proof — For the condemnation passed on Asceticism no warrant can be found in the Gospels. Proof Bishop Gastrell’s Institute. Ch. 8 or 2 §. 1. Positive proof from the discourses of Jesus 1. Eating and drinking with sinners justified. Things entering the body defile not Mosaic law 2. Fasts scorned then Mosaic law abolished. 3. Sabbath scorned. 4. Perfume accepted. 5 Samaritan woman cohabiting without marriage unreproved. 6. Adultery tolerated. 7 Harlots declared to go to heaven before Pharisees. Ch. 9 or 3 3. Presumptive proof from his practice, the practice of Jesus. §. 1. Introduction. §. 2. Intercourse with Mary Magdalene and other females. Paul’s notion respecting it. explanation of it §. 3. Mary Magdalene — no warrant for sup posing her a prostitute. §. 4. Origin of the supposition of her being a prostitute. Asceticism is formsno part of the religion of Jesus. Ch. 10 or 4. The condemnation passed upon these forms not any part of the religion of Jesus. §. 1. In the allusion made by Jesus to the destruction of the ill-famed cities no condemnation of the eccentric pleasures of the bed is contained. §. 2. The propensity to the eccentric pleasure of the bed, when reaped by consent is not the reported cause of the destruction of the ill famed cities. Ch. 11 or 5. Condemnation passed on the eccentric pleasures of the bed in the Mosaic law — it had its source in an illusion of the fancy. Ch. 12. or 6 Disregard Little regard shewn to the Mosaic prohibitions of the eccentric pleasures of the bed. §. 1. Story of the Young Levite and his Concubine Judges XIX §. 2 Story of Jonathan and David §. 3. Houses of resort for this purpose protected under the Kings §. 4. In the discourses of the Prophets no condemnation of theses pleasures is contained. Ch. 13 or 7. The eccentric pleasures of the bed whether partaken of by Jesus? §. 1. Introduction. §. 2. Intercourse of Jesus with the Apostle John §. 3. Intercourse of Jesus with the stripling in the loose attire. §. 4. Jesus and Socrates compared in this respect.
-
Title: [[Around folios 1 to 19] Defence of]Description: [Around folios 1 to 19] Defence of Economy - II. ag t I. Burke Ch. 4 Concerning party men and their principles. [Around folios 1 to 13] Sextus for B. [Around folios 20 to 41] Ch. 9. Paul’s Style. I. Argument. §. 1. For judging of aptitude of style in antient discourses the existing state of things is no improper object of reference. What would be unapt now was unapt then. §. 2. Forms of inaptitude in style - Forms of intellectual weakness in argumentation: 1. Obscurity; - in its highest degree, Nonsensicalness: 2 Irrelevancy in argumentation; 3. Irrelevancy in reference - demonstration ex auctoritate ill conducted; 4. Desultoriness §. 3. By obscurity, inspiration may be disproved: and in Paul’s case, is. §. 4. Nonsense - its abundance in Paul’s discourses. §. 5. Paul’s demonstrations ex auctoritate - their irrelevancy. [verso] Ch. 8 2 o Paul’s Style. [Around folios 42 to 57] Ch. 6 I. Argument Paul’s Style §. Different forms of Nonsense observable in the discourses of S t Paul [Around folios 58 to 68] I. Argument 2 1 Style and Character [Around folios 69 to 85] I. Argument Ch Paul’s Character §. 1. All things to all men. §. 2. Falsified predictions. [Around folios 86 to 128] I. Argument Ch. 6 Of Quasi-Miracles, Visions, Quasi-Visions and Trances. [Around folios 133 to 140] I. Argument. Ch. 7 Natural causes of Paul’s Success. §. 1. Energy - how operating as a pledge of security it produces persuasion in favour of any discourse /doctrine/ howsoever absurd. §. 2. Nonsense - its advantage - it is refutation proof. §. 3. The success of a religion is no proof of its verity. §. 4. The more absurd a religion, the stronger the attachment to it. [Full folio wrapper around folios 141 to 214] [front cover] III Style. Character. III. Doctrine (exclusive of Asceticism. [spine] 1818. Not Paul. Style Character and Doctrine not concerning Asceticism. [Around folios 141 to 162] III. Doctrine Ch Paul’s Doctrines §. 1. Plan of this Chapter §. 2. Paul’s doctrine avowedly independent of that delivered to us as Jesus’s §. 2. Real object and design of Paul’s doctrines - his temporal advancement. §. 3. Doctrines more immediately subservient to that end 1. Magnification of faith: viz in the sense inculcated by him. §. 4. — 2. Depreciation of works: viz. in that Mosaic sense in which they were rivals to faith as above in the struggle for salvation §. 5. Doctrines less immediately and forcibly subservient: 1. Mysticism. 2. Asceticism [Around folios 163 to 172] Not Paul III. Doctrine § Mysticism on the commemoration of the death of Jesus. [verso] Not Paul Ch. Conclusion. [Around folios 173 to 186] III. Doctrine. Ch. III. Faith - its alledged necessity to salvation - alledged duty of possessing it. [Around folios 187 to 199] Ch. 9. Paul’s Doctrine Ch. or §. Causes of Paul’s asceticism §. 1. Cause I. In all other pursuits he beheld rivals to that he preached: the greater the pleasure, the more formidable the rivalry §. 2. II Cause II. Notion he found prevalent - heaven not to be purchased but by sacrifices: the greater the sacrifice, the surer the purchase. §. 3. Paul’s arguments in support of asceticism - their absurdity. §. 4. By his anxiety to obtain female married converts, Paul is led into repugnancy to Jesus [Around folio 208] III. Doctrine. excepting Asceticism. [Around folios 209 to 211] Not Paul III Doctrine §. 1. Faith - Paul’s meaning by it. Faith in him, or to his use [Around folios 212 to 214] III. Doctrine. Ch. 10 Ch. 10 Mischievous Doctrines, deduced from Paul but unwarrantably
-
Title: [1818 Feb. 2 Not Paul III. Doctrine]Description: 1818 Feb. 2 Not Paul III. Doctrine Ch. Motives to Doctrine Asceticism II. Bed Eccentric II. Pleasures of the bed in the eccentric shapes. Under this head, /for/ very little matter of observation will be necessary. /there be any demand./ Under the former heads the motives by which the principle /dæmon/ of asceticism was put in motion have been indicated and proved. To very few of either sex—and to those of the male still fewer than those of the female are the pleasures of /sensations that belong to/ this sense matters of entire indifference. But some there in whose instance the desire excited by these pleasures in some eccentric shape is stronger even than the desire excited by those same pleasures in the ordinary and thence more natural shape. In these instances, the ‘distraction’ to the rival power of which this saint was so busily employed in opposing the power of mysterious terrors would in a correspondent degree be more efficient. Under this head nothing more remains than to produce the passages in and by which the condemnation passed by /war waged by/ Paul against the pleasures of the bed in these shapes is contained. Proofs of the war waged by Paul against the pleasures of the bed in their eccentric shapes.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1